|Scientific Name:||Dasyatis dipterura|
|Species Authority:||(Jordan & Gilbert, 1880)|
Dasyatis brevis (Garman, 1880)
Dasyatis hawaiiensis Jenkins, 1903
Dasybatis dipterurus Jordan & Gilbert, 1880
|Taxonomic Notes:||Nomenclature of this species is often confused, occasionally resulting in the listing of D. brevis and D. dipterura as separate species. Both Jordan and Gilbert and Garman published descriptions of this species in the same year, 1880. However, Jordan and Gilbert published their account of specimens from San Diego in May of 1880, while Garman published his description in October of that year. Garman (1913) subsequently overlooked these facts and inappropriately synonymized D. dipterura with D. brevis. However, Jordan and Gilbert's description has precedence and is recognized as the original by the American Fisheries Society and Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes. The species originally described as D. hawaiiensis Jenkins, 1903 from Hawaii was later synonymized as D. dipterura (Nishida and Nakaya 1990). Additional taxonomic work on the Hawaiian dasyatids is necessary to further clarify the relationships of these stingrays to the eastern Pacific fauna.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Data Deficient ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Smith, W.D., Bizzarro, J.J. & Lamilla, J.|
|Reviewer(s):||Kyne, P.M. & Fowler, S.L. (Shark Red List Authority)|
Dasyatis dipterura is a broadly distributed but poorly known stingray from the eastern Pacific. Biological and fishery information is primarily available from México where D. dipterura is commonly landed among artisanal elasmobranch fisheries and frequently taken as bycatch in trawl fisheries (especially by shrimp trawlers). Populations from the Mexican Pacific display seasonal movement patterns related to reproductive events, but no information is available on trends in abundance. Recent studies indicate that this stingray is relatively long lived (to at least 28 years), has a low fecundity (1 to 4), and a low intrinsic rate of increase. Female growth rates are estimated to be among the lowest reported for any batoid. These combined factors indicate that D. dipterura populations are of low productivity and demonstrate limited resilience to fishing pressure. Due to its vulnerability and importance within the unregulated artisanal elasmobranch fishery, this stingray is considered Near Threatened in México. Based on the lack of information pertaining to the biology, distribution, and fisheries for this species throughout the majority of its range, D. dipterura is classified as Data Deficient in the USA as well as Central and South America. Where is it taken in fisheries in those regions it may prove to be at risk when more information is available.
|Range Description:||Reports of this stingray from British Columbia, Canada (Hart 1973) are questionable and have not been verified. If accurate, they represent anomalies, as D. dipterura is typically a subtropical to tropical species. The confirmed range is from southern California, USA to Chile (where it is occasional only); including the Galápagos and Hawaiian Islands (Eschmeyer et al. 1983, Nishida and Nakaya 1990, Lamilla et al. 1995).|
Native:Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Ecuador (Galápagos); El Salvador; Guatemala; Honduras; Mexico (Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Sinaloa); Nicaragua; Panama; Peru; United States (California, Hawaiian Is.)
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:|
Present - origin uncertain:
Pacific – eastern central; Pacific – northwest; Pacific – southeast
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Rough estimates of D. dipterura abundance were calculated by Mathews and Druck-Gonzalez (1975) from the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex, Baja California Sur, México based on trawl surveys. These authors noted a distinct seasonal trend in abundance within the lagoon complex and estimated 112,000 individuals present in February, increasing to 378,000 in August. Species identifications were problematic and these estimates may include D. longa or urotrygonid rays. In the Gulf of California, exploratory trawl surveys indicated that D. dipterura comprised 26% of the total demersal catch weight (Flores et al. 1995). No details on the abundance of this species outside of México are available. |
In Chile, the southern extent of the species' distribution, and southern California, the northern extent of its distribution, this species is rare. In Chile, it is known only from three specimens taken in the north (Antofagasta). Its occurrence in these extremities of its range appears to be linked to suitable climatic conditions due to El Niño (Lamilla, et al. 1995, Ebert, 2003).
No information on subpopulations or fragmentation is available.
|Current Population Trend:||Unknown|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Dasyatis dipterura is a demersal stingray known primarily from relatively shallow, inshore waters over sand and mud bottoms or near rocky outcrops and kelp beds (Feder et al. 1974, Eschmeyer et al. 1983). Off southern California, the species has been reported to occupy shallow waters (intertidal to 7 m) in the summer and moves to depths of 13 to 17.7 m during the late fall and winter months (Feder et al. 1974). In Chile the species has been reported at depths of 3 to 30 m. However, Chave and Mundy (1994) reported D. dipterura from depths of 52 to 150 m over sand bottoms in the Hawaiian archipelago. The Hawaiian records may represent a misidentification or indicate that a much broader depth range may be potentially utilized by this species. |
The limited biological information available for D. dipterura is derived primarily from the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex, Baja California Sur, México. These parameters may differ markedly throughout the species' range. In the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex, courtship and insemination is thought to occur in the late summer during July and August (Mariano-Melendez 1997). Sperm storage or diapause may contribute to delayed development of embryos and gestation is suggested to occur over 2 to 2.5 months with pupping taking place the following summer (July-September) in shallow estuaries (Mariano-Melendez 1997). Reproduction appears to be annual and litter sizes range from one to four pups (Mariano-Melendez 1997, Smith 2004). Reproductive mode is aplacental viviparity in which embryos are nourished by a combination of a small yolk-sac and histotrophe secreted from the uterus (as with all myliobatoid rays). Only a single ovary is functional. Maximum size is ~100 cm disc width (DW) (McEachran and Notarbartolo-di-Sciara 1995) and size at birth ranges 18 to 23 cm DW (Mariano-Melendez 1997, Smith 2004). The median size at maturity is estimated to be 58.5 cm DW (males) and 43.4 cm DW (females). Growth estimates based on vertebral ageing indicate that these sizes correspond to ages of 10 years in females and seven years in males (see life history parameters below for other maturity estimates). Age analysis indicates slow growth rates and maximum observed ages up to 28 years. Von Bertalanffy models estimate growth coefficients of 0.55 y-1 for females and 0.10 y-1 for males (Smith 2004). Females attain greater sizes and ages than males. Catch records suggest that the species may segregate by size and sex (Mathews and Druck-Gonzalez 1975, Smith 2004).
Diet is comprised primarily of infaunal organisms and large feeding pits are excavated by jetting water and through movements of the pectoral fins. Some epibenthic species are also taken. In the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex, pea crabs (Pinnotheridae), razor clams (Solyema valvulus) and polychaetes are the primary prey items, in order of decreasing importance (Bizzarro 2005).
Life history parameters
Age at maturity: 10 years (50% maturity) (Smith 2004) (female); 7 years (50% maturity) (Smith 2004) (male).
Size at maturity (disc width): 50% Maturity: 58.5 cm DW (Smith 2004), 65.5 cm DW (Mariano-Melendez 1997), 1st Maturity: 57 cm DW (Smith 2004) (female); 50% Maturity: 43.3 cm DW (Smith 2004), 45.5 cm DW (Mariano-Melendez 1997), 1st Maturity: 47 cm DW (Smith 2004) (male).
Longevity: at least 28 years (maximum observed) (Smith 2004).
Maximum size (disc width): ~100 cm DW (McEachran and Notarbartolo-di-Sciara 1995).
Size at birth: 18 to 23 cm DW (Mariano-Melendez 1997, Smith 2004).
Average reproductive age: 14.6 years (Smith 2004).
Gestation time: ~2.5 to 3 months (Mariano-Melendez 1997).
Reproductive periodicity: Annual (Mariano-Melendez 1997).
Average annual fecundity or litter size: Maximum observed: 4 (Mariano-Melendez 1997); Mean litter size: 2.7 (Smith 2004).
Annual rate of population increase: Mean λ = 1.06 per year (Smith 2004).
Natural mortality: General indirect estimates: 0.07 to 0.15 per year (range; multiple methods of estimation) (Smith 2004); Age-specific indirect estimates: 0.03-0.35 per year (range; Peterson and Wroblewski and Chen and Watanabe approaches) (Smith 2004).
Directed artisanal fisheries and incidental catch among trawl fisheries and other artisanal fisheries using gillnets, longlines, or traps.
Dasyatis dipterura represents a primary component of artisanal elasmobranch fishery catches of the Pacific coast of México and the Gulf of California (Bizzarro et al. 2000, R. Hueter et al. unpublished data, Smith 2004, Bizzarro 2005). Its contribution to the fishery is likely underestimated due to the lack of species-specific landing information and potential misidentification. Although present in artisanal landings throughout the year, catches of this stingray are highest during the summer and fall (Notarbartolo di Sciara 1987; Bizzarro et al. 2000). Dasyatis dipterura is the second most abundant batoid landed in coastal waters of Sonora, México, comprising ~19% of all batoid landings in seasonal surveys conducted in 1998 and 1999 (R. Hueter et al., unpublished data, Márquez-Farías 2002). This species is targeted during primarily summer months in Bahía Almejas, located in the southern portion of the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex, Baja California Sur, México. In this embayment, it is most abundant batoid species landed in August (~43%) and the fourth most abundant batoid in June landings (~8%) (Bizzarro 2005). Individuals are primarily captured in demersal gillnets in which their tail spines are entangled. This method of entanglement allows a wide range of mesh sizes to be effective for capturing juveniles as well as adults. Juveniles comprised the majority of individuals landed in the Bahía Magdalena lagoon complex artisanal elasmobranch fishery during 1998-2000 (Smith 2004, Bizzarro 2005, Bizzarro and Smith in preparation).
Based on records from exploratory fishing surveys, it is likely that this species represents a significant component of trawl bycatch fisheries (especially shrimp trawl bycatch) in the Mexican Pacific (Mathews and Druck-Gonzalez 1975, Flores et al. 1995). No information is available on the species' actual contribution to bycatch in other artisanal or trawl fisheries in México, or through its Central and South American range.
Many coastal embayments and mangrove lagoons in north Pacific México, which serve as habitat for D. dipterura, are being altered for the purpose of shrimp farming. Although these activities are presently limited, their expected increase could detrimentally alter suitable habitat for this species (Bizzarro pers. obs.).
Dasyatis dipterura fisheries and bycatch are unmanaged throughout the species range. In México, a moratorium on the issue of elasmobranch fishing permits was enacted in 1993, but no formal management plan has been implemented. However, legislation is currently being developed in México to establish national elasmobranch fishery management. Elasmobranch fisheries are unmanaged throughout Central and South America. Attempts to monitor and regulate fisheries in the eastern tropical Pacific would greatly improve conservation of D. dipterura and other chondrichthyans.
Elasmobranch landings reported from México and Central America typically lack species-specific details. Large sharks are generally grouped as "tiburónes" and small sharks as "cazonés" while batoids are often simply termed "manta raya" collectively. Mexican federal fisheries agencies recently began providing slightly more taxonomic resolution of ray landings by listing several new categories. Landings of D. dipterura, however, may still be unknown as they are grouped in the modified category of "manta raya" that may include dasyatid as well as urotrygonid and mobulid species. Additional monitoring of artisanal elasmobranch fisheries and commercial trawl bycatch on a species-specific basis is critical for detecting trends in effort, abundance, and catch of elasmobranchs. Concise guides to species identification for both fishermen and fisheries biologists would be a valuable aid for improving the monitoring of these landings. Fishery-independent surveys of this and other demersal elasmobranchs are necessary to provide estimates of abundance and biomass.
In addition to species-specific catch details, life history information including age, growth, longevity, movement patterns, habitat use, diet, and further reproductive studies from other portions of the species range are necessary to develop effective conservation actions for D. dipterura. Direct estimates of fishing and natural mortality are critical for assessing the impact of fisheries on a species and would greatly improve population models of this vulnerable species.
The development and implementation of management plans (national and/or regional e.g., under the FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks: IPOA-Sharks) are required to facilitate the conservation and sustainable management of all chondrichthyan species in the region. See Anon. (2004) for an update of progress made by nations in the range of D. dipterura.
Anonymous. 2004. Report on the implementation of the UN FAO International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA–Sharks). AC20 Inf. 5. Twentieth meeting of the CITES Animals Committee, Johannesburg (South Africa), 29 March–2 April 2004.
Bizzarro, J.J. 2005. Diet and ecomorphology of the dominant species in the Bahía Almejas ray fishery. M.S. Thesis. Moss Landing Marine Labs.
Bizzarro, J.J., Smith, W.D., Jones, E.J. and Cailliet, G.M. 2000. The artisanal elasmobranch fishery of Baja California Norte (Gulf of California, Mexico). Abstract. 80th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists & 16th Annual Meeting of the American Elasmobranch Society, 14-20 June, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur; La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Breder, C.M., Jr. 1928. Elasmobranchii from Panama to Lower California. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanography Collection of Yale University 2(1): 1–13.
Chave, E.H. and Mundy, B.C. 1994. Deep-sea benthic fish of the Hawaiian Archipelago, Cross Seamount, and Johnston Atoll. Pacific Science 48: 367-409.
Ebert, D.A. 2003. Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Eschmeyer, W.N., Herald, E.S. and Hammann, H. 1983. A field guide to Pacific coast fishes of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, USA.
Feder, H.M., Turner, C.H. and Limbaugh, C. 1974. Observations on fishes associated with kelp beds in southern California. California Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 160: 44.
Flores, J.O., Rodriguez, M., Shimizu, M. and Machii, T. 1995. Evaluation of demersal fishery resources of the Gulf of California using Mexican shrimp trawlers. Journal of the National Fisheries University (Japan) 44(1):9–19.
Hart, J.L. 1973. Pacific fishes of Canada. Bulletin Fisheries Research Board Canada 180: 740.
IUCN. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group. Specialist Group website. Available at: http://www.iucnssg.org/.
Lamilla, J., Pequeño, G. and Kong, I. 1995. Dasyatis brevis (Garman, 1880) segunda especie de Dasyatidae registrada para Chile (Chondrichthyes, Myliobatiformes). Estudios Oceanológicos 14:23–27.
Mariano-Melendéz, E. 1997. Biología reproductiva de la raya lodera Dasyatis brevis (Garman, 1880), en Bahía Almejas, B.C.S., México. Tesis, Universidad Autóma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, B.C.S., México
Márquez-Farías, J.F. 2002. The artisanal ray fishery in the Gulf of California: development, fisheries research, and management issues. Shark News 14: 12-13.
Mathews, C.P. and Druck-Gonzalez, J. 1975. Potencial pesquero y estudios de Bahia Magdalena III. Las existencias de rayas con especial interes a las ya aprovechadas. Ciencias Marinas 2(1):67–72.
McEachran, J.D. and Notarbartolo-di-Sciara, G. 1995. Peces Batoideos. In: W. Fischer, F. Krupp, W. Schneider, C. Sommer, K.E. Carpenter and V.H. Niem (eds). Guia FAO para la Identificacion de Especies para los Fines de la Pesca Centro Oriental: Parte 1 – Vertebrados. pp: 745–792. FAO, Rome.
Nishida, K. and Nakaya, K. 1990. Taxonomy of the Genus Dasyatis (Elasmobranchii, Dasyatididae) from the North Pacific. In: H.L. Pratt, S.H. Gruber & T. Taniuchi (eds). Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries. NOAA Technical Report 90:327-345.
Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. 1987. Myliobatiform rays fished in the southern Gulf of California (Baja California Sur, México) (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes). Memorias del V Simposium sobre Biología Marina. Universidad Autόnoma de Baja California Sur: 109–115.
Smith, W.D. 2004. Life history aspects and population dynamics of a commercially exploited stingray, Dasyatis dipterura. M.Sc. Thesis, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, California, USA.
Villavicencio-Garayzar, C.J. 1995. Distribución temporal y condición reproductive de las rayas (Pisces: Batoidei), capturadas commercialmente en Bahía Almejas, B.C.S., México. Revista de Investigación Científica 6(1–2):1–12.
|Citation:||Smith, W.D., Bizzarro, J.J. & Lamilla, J. 2006. Dasyatis dipterura. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T60152A12314148.Downloaded on 27 October 2016.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|