|Scientific Name:||Aetomylaeus maculatus|
|Species Authority:||(Gray, 1834)|
Aetomylaeus milvus (Valenciennes, 1841)
Myliobatus maculatus Gray, 1834
|Taxonomic Notes:||Aetomylaeus milvus (Valenciennes in Müller & Henle, 1841) is most likely a synonym of this species. Further investigation is required.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Endangered A2d+3d+4d ver 3.1|
|Reviewer/s:||Kyne, P.M., Fowler, S.L. & Compagno, L.J.V. (Shark Red List Authority)|
Aetomylaeus maculates is a medium-sized (to 78 cm disc width), inshore Indo-West Pacific eagle ray which is highly susceptible to a variety of fishing methods in regions where the level of exploitation of marine resources is extremely high (e.g., India, Thailand, Taiwan and Indonesia). It is caught regularly by demersal gillnet and trawl net fisheries that operate throughout its range. It is suspected to have limiting life history parameters similar to other myliobatid rays (including low fecundity). This species is assessed as Endangered under the criteria of A2bd+3d+4d due to the very high (and increasing) level of fishing pressure in inshore regions where it occurs, which is of great concern for any inshore species with limiting life history characteristics that is highly susceptible to fishing activities, and evidence of extirpation from some areas (this species no longer occurs in the Gulf of Thailand where eagle rays were historically common).
|Range Description:||Sporadic distribution in the Eastern Indian, Western Central Pacific and Northwest Pacific.|
Native:China; India; Indonesia (Jawa, Kalimantan); Malaysia; Singapore; Sri Lanka; Taiwan, Province of China; Thailand
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:||
Indian Ocean – eastern; Pacific – northwest; Pacific – western central
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Appears to be naturally uncommon, observed in low numbers in fish markets in SE Asia.|
|Habitat and Ecology:||
A little known species. Occurs on the inner continental shelf to depths of about 60 m over soft sandy substrate (Compagno and Last 1999). Reproductive biology, age and growth and dietary compositions are unknown for this species. Suspected low fecundity as with other myliobatids, for example Aetobatus narinari and Aetomylaeus nichofii, which bear litters of up to four offspring (Last and Stevens 1994, Compagno and Last 1999).
Life history parameters
Age at maturity (years): Unknown.
Size at maturity (disc width): Unknown (female); 55 cm DW not yet mature (mature by 71 cm DW) (W. White, unpubl. data) (male).
Longevity (years): Unknown.
Maximum size (disc width): 78 cm DW (Compagno and Last 1999).
Size at birth (cm): Unknown.
Average reproductive age (years): Unknown.
Gestation time (months): Unknown.
Reproductive periodicity: Unknown.
Average annual fecundity or litter size: Up to 4 (based in similar species).
Annual rate of population increase: Unknown.
Natural mortality: Unknown.
|Major Threat(s):||Highly susceptible to a variety of inshore demersal fisheries, including trawls, gillnets and trammel nets which operate intensively throughout its range (e.g., India, Thailand, Taiwan and Indonesia). All caught are retained in most areas. Local eagle ray species are marketed in considerable numbers in Thailand and Malaysia (Compagno and Last 1999) and A. maculates is regularly landed in low numbers in the fish markets of Jakarta (Indonesia) by trawlers (W. White, unpublished data). Even though once common, eagle rays are now rare in the Gulf of Thailand (Compagno and Last 1999), where A. maculates has been locally extirpated (L.J.V. Compagno pers. comm.). Intensive demersal fisheries occur in India, in the species? known distribution (Hanfee 1999). There is very high level of exploitation on the habitat that this species occurs in throughout its entire range.|
None in place. Market surveys are currently being conducted for elasmobranchs in Indonesia.
The development and implementation of management plans (national and/or regional e.g., under the FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks: IPOA?Sharks) are required to facilitate the conservation and sustainable management of all chondrichthyan species in the region. See Anon. (2004) for an update of progress made by nations in the range of A. maculates.
Anonymous. 2004. Report on the implementation of the UN FAO International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA?Sharks). AC20 Inf. 5. Twentieth meeting of the CITES Animals Committee, Johannesburg (South Africa), 29 March?2 April 2004.
Compagno, L.J.V. and Last, P.R. 1999. Myliobatidae. Eagle rays. In: K.E. Carpenter and V.H. Niem (eds) FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 3. Batoid Fishes, Chimaeras and Bony Fishes Part 1 (Elopidae to Linophrynidae). pp. 1511-1519. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Hanfee, F. 1999. Management of shark fisheries in two Indian coastal states: Tamil Nadu and Kerala. In: R. Shotton (ed.) Case studies of the management of elasmobranch fisheries. FAO technical paper 378/1, FAO Rome.
IUCN. 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 04 May 2006.
IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group. Specialist Group website. Available at: http://www.iucnssg.org/.
Last, P.R. and Stevens, J.D. 1994. Sharks and Rays of Australia. CSIRO, Australia.
|Citation:||White, W.T. 2006. Aetomylaeus maculatus. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 April 2014.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided|