|Scientific Name:||Carcharhinus tilstoni (Whitley, 1950)|
Carcharhinus limbatus (non Müller & Henle, 1839)
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Pillans, R. & Stevens, J. (SSG Australia & Oceania Regional Workshop, March 2003)|
|Reviewer(s):||Fowler, S. & Cavanagh, R.D. (Shark Red List Authority)|
A northern Australian continental shelf endemic occurring from close inshore to about 150 m. CPUE data for sharks in the Taiwanese gill net fishery (now closed) of which Carcharhinus tilstoni comprised about 40%, together with this species' fast growth rates, early maturity and relatively high fecundity suggests that it is more resilient to exploitation than many other shark species, and will already have recovered from depletion by this fishery in the 1980s. Currently, annual landings of sharks in Northern Australia (mainly C. tilstoni and C. sorrah) are significantly smaller than historical catches. Although there is a need to monitor catches in these fisheries, current catch rates are highly unlikely to threaten the population.
|Range Description:||Together with C. sorrah, this species is an important component of the Northern Australian commercial shark fishery. Data from Taiwanese gill netting between 1975 and 1978 showed highest catches in North Queensland, Torres Staight, Gulf of Papua, Gulf of Carpentaria and Inshore Arafura Sea. Average size of C. tilstoni captured in the Timor Sea were much smaller than the areas above, suggesting that C. tilstoni utilizes the inshore areas of the Timor sea as a nursery area. Often occurs in large aggregations. Size showed a sharp increase with increasing depth (Lyle 1987).|
Native:Australia (Northern Territory, Queensland, Western Australia)
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:|
Indian Ocean – eastern; Pacific – western central
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Genetic evidence suggested that this species forms one population in Australian waters (Lavery and Shacklee 1989. Tagging studies off Northern Australia have shown that 60% of sharks were recaptured within 50 km of the tagging site, however one shark was captured 1,113 km away (Stevens et al. 2000). These authors also showed that most animals moved along the coast line. Data from this study suggested that although there was sufficient movement to prevent stock differentiation, the degree of movement was not great enough to prevent a reduction in local population as a result of heavy fishing pressure. This conclusion contradicted those of Lavery and Shacklee (1989) who concluded that local populations would be well buffered by immigration of sharks from other areas and that under high fishing pressure, total population size rather than local population size was likely to be the limiting factor affecting production.|
|Current Population Trend:||Stable|
|Habitat and Ecology:||A viviparous species with a gestation period of 10 months. C. tilstoni reproduces annually, producing an average litter size of three (1-6). Size at birth is 60 cm total length (TL). Age at maturity is 3 to 4 years: males reach maturity at 110 cm TL, females at 115 cm TL. Maximum size is 200 m TL. Growth rates, Juveniles: 17 cm.y-¹ for the first year, declining to 8 to 10 cm per year when the sharks are about five years old (Davenport and Stevens 1988, Last and Stevens 1994, Stevens and Wiley 1986).|
Historically, C. tilstoni contributed to the Taiwanese gill net fishery that operated in Australian waters between 1979-1986 (Stevens and Davenport 1991). This fisheries annual catch was about 7,000 tonnes processed weight of shark, tuna and mackerel. Sharks comprised about 80% of the total catch with C. sorrah and C. tilstoni accounting for about 60% (20% and 40% respectively). CPUE of sharks declined from 11 kg/km in 1979 to 3 kg/km in 1984 then increased to about 6 kg/km in 1986 (the year this fishery ceased), (Stevens and Davenport 1991) suggesting a roughly 50% population depletion. There was an apparent decrease in the number of mature male and female C. tilstoni from 1981 to 1986 (Stevens and Davenport 1991). Data from this fishery between 1975-1978 showed the highest catches were in North Queensland, Torres Straight, Gulf of Papua, Gulf of Carpentaria and Inshore Arafura Sea.
Together with C. sorrah, this species is an important component of the Northern Australian commercial shark fishery. C. tilstoni is captured as both a target species and as bycatch in Northern Australian shark, finfish and prawn trawl fisheries. Annual landings of sharks in Northern Australia (mainly C. tilstoni and C. sorrah) are estimated at between 100 and 900 tonnes live weight and these catch rates are highly unlikely to threaten the population.
Davenport, S. and Stevens, J.D. 1988. Age and growth of two commercially important sharks (Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) from Northern Australia. Australian Journal Marine Freshwater Research 39: 417–433.
IUCN. 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 18 November 2003.
IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group. Specialist Group website. Available at: http://www.iucnssg.org/.
Last, P.R. and Stevens, J.D. 2009. Sharks and Rays of Australia. Second Edition. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
Lavery, S. and Shacklee, J.B. 1989. Population genetics of two tropical sharks, Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah, in Northern Australia. Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40, 541 - 547
Stevens, J.D., West, G.J. and Mcloughlin, K.J. 2000. Movement, recapture patterns, and factors affecting the return rate of carcharhinid and other sharks tagged off Northern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 51: 127–141
|Citation:||Pillans, R. & Stevens, J. (SSG Australia & Oceania Regional Workshop, March 2003). 2003. Carcharhinus tilstoni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2003: e.T41739A10551498.Downloaded on 20 March 2018.|