|Scientific Name:||Widdringtonia cedarbergensis J.A.Marsh|
|Taxonomic Source(s):||Farjon, A. 2010. A Handbook of the World's Conifers. Koninklijke Brill, Leiden.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Critically Endangered A2acd ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Farjon, A., February, E., Higgins, S., Fox, S. & Raimondo, D.|
|Reviewer(s):||Thomas, P. & von Staden, L.|
Intensive exploitation in the past, accompanied by changes in intensity and frequency of fires, has resulted in an estimated and observed decline in area of occupancy and quality of habitat of more than 80%. The causes of this decline, while understood, are not reversible and have not ceased. Consequently, Widdringtonia cedarbergensis is assessed as Critically Endangered under the criteria for A2.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
|Range Description:||Endemic to South Africa: Western Cape Province, Clanwilliam District, Cedarberg Mountains. Higgins et al. (2002) produced a fine scale model of suitable habitat for this species. The modelled range was then ground-truthed through field surveys, and based on these surveys the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the Clanwilliam Cedar was calculated to be 660 km2. The survey also revealed that only 6% of suitable habitat is occupied by the species with an actual area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be 39.6 km2. While there are several localities, the number of locations (sensu IUCN) is difficult to determine as the severity and extent of fires (the main threat) can vary depending on their origin or cause.|
Native:South Africa (Western Cape)
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
Historical reports indicate that the species was formerly abundant within the Cedarberg Mountains, and that the first and most severe population decline occurred after European colonizers settled in the area in the late 18th century. The vegetation of the Cedarberg is very poor in tree species, and the Clanwilliam Cedar was heavily exploited for timber. In 1879 alone more than 7,000 trees were cut down for use as telephone poles (Andrag 1977). This overexploitation caused a significant population reduction, which is corroborated by the pollen record (Meadows and Sugden 1991). By 1883 no accessible trees of commercial value remained (Mustart 2008). Although it is not possible to quantify exactly the population reduction as a result of timber harvesting, it is suspected that harvesting caused an 80-90% reduction in the population.
Although timber harvesting has ceased, the population has never recovered: it would be impossible to find even a hundred telephone pole-sized trees in the Cedarberg today (Mustart 2008). Attempts to increase the population through seeding and introduction of ex situ grown plants have been largely unsuccessful.A synthesis of long-term monitoring data of trees in four permanent plots records a 94% population decline between 1977 and 2003 (Fox 2003). This decline has been attributed to too frequent and intense fires.
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Remnant populations of this species are restricted to rocky ridges and cliffs ('krantzes' or 'kranse') of Table Mountain Sandstone, avoiding other formations below and above it. The altitudinal range is (915-)1,000-1,500(-1,650) m a.s.l. The trees are often protected by large boulders from frequent brush fires in the surrounding (secondary) fynbos vegetation. The annual rainfall is between 500-1,000 mm and occurs mostly in the cold winter months, while summers are dry and hot.|
|Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:||Yes|
|Generation Length (years):||100|
|Use and Trade:||Clanwilliam Cedar has been extensively logged for its dense, easily workable and durable timber by European settlers. It was used for fence posts, construction of farm houses and sheds and later for carpentry, furniture, and cabinet making, until the resource dwindled and the last stands were almost destroyed by fires. In the nearby town of Clanwilliam beautifully worked examples can be seen in the Anglican church (doors, pews, carved altar) and Courthouse.|
|Major Threat(s):||Historical exploitation for its valuable timber during the 19th centry led to a reduction of up to 95%. One consequence of this was the expansion of fynbos, a highly flammable vegetation formation. More frequent and more intense fires prevent regeneration; surviving trees are restricted to rocky ridges, ledges, and outcrops mostly beyond reach of the flames. Natural regeneration is also hampered as a result of granivory and herbivory by native rodents.|
|Conservation Actions:||Today the few remaining trees are protected from cutting for any purposes. Cultivation is now undertaken primarily with a view of population restoration and the species is consequently grown in local nurseries as well as in several botanic gardens. Attempts at replanting are continually being made with low rates of success (Mustart et al. 1995) and extensive ex situ conservation efforts are under-way in South Africa, backed by smaller scale plantings elsewhere.|
Andrag, R.H. 1977. Studies in die Sederberge oor (i) die status van die Clanwilliam seder (Widdringtonia cedarbergensis Marsh) (ii) buiteligontspanning. University of Stellenbosch.
Farjon, A. 2010. A Handbook of the World's Conifers. Koninklijke Brill, Leiden.
February, E.C. and Stock, W.D. 1988. The relationship between ring width measures and precipitation for Widdringtonia cedarbergensis. South African Journal of Botany 64: 213-216.
Fox, S. 2003. An assessment of the population status and demographic models of Widdringtonia cedarbergensis. Unpublished BSc Hons . University of Cape Town.
Higgins, S., February, E.C. and Skowno, A. 2002. Distribution and population viability of Clanwilliam cedar (Widdringtonia cedarbergensis, Cupressaceae). Final report to WWF-SA Table Mountain Fund. WWF-SA Table Mountain Fund.
Hilton-Taylor, C. (ed.). 1996. Red Data List of Southern African Plants. Strelitzia 4. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
IUCN. 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2013.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 12 June 2013).
Luckoff, H.A. 1971. The Clanwilliam Cedar (Widdringtonia cedarbergensis Marsh); its past history and present status. Journal of Botanical Society of South Africa 57: 17-24.
Manders, P.T. 1986. An assessment of the current status of the Clanwilliam cedar (Widdringtonia cedarbergensis) and the reasons for its decline . South African Forest Journal 139: 48-53.
Meadows, M. and Sugden, J. 1991. A vegetation history of the last 14 000 years on the Cederberg, south western Cape Province . South African Journal of Science 87: 34-43.
Mustart, P.J. 2008. A synthesis of information on Widdringtonia cedarbergensis (the Clanwilliam Cedar). Unpublished report to the Botanical Society of South Africa.
Mustart, P., Juritz, J., Makua, C., Van der Merwe, S.W. and Wessels, N. 1995. Restoration of the clanwilliam cedar Widdringtonia cedarbergensis: the importance of monitoring seedlings planted in the Cederberg, South Africa. Biological Conservation 72:73-76.
Schellevis, N. and Schouten, J. 1999. Clanwilliam cedar (Widdringtonia cedarbergensis J. A. Marsh). In: A. Farjon and C.N. Page (eds), Conifers. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. , pp. 90-91. IUCN/SSC Conifer Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
|Citation:||Farjon, A., February, E., Higgins, S., Fox, S. & Raimondo, D. 2013. Widdringtonia cedarbergensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T30365A2793077.Downloaded on 22 February 2018.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|