Map_thumbnail_large_font

Acrocephalus sechellensis 

Scope: Global
Language: English
Status_ne_offStatus_dd_offStatus_lc_offStatus_nt_onStatus_vu_offStatus_en_offStatus_cr_offStatus_ew_offStatus_ex_off

Translate page into:

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Passeriformes Acrocephalidae

Scientific Name: Acrocephalus sechellensis (Oustalet, 1877)
Common Name(s):
English Seychelles Warbler, Seychelles Brush Warbler, Seychelles Brush-Warbler
French Fauvette des Seychelles
Synonym(s):
Bebrornis sechellensis ssp. sechellensis (Oustalet, 1877) [in Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)]
Ellisia sechellensis Oustalet, 1877
Taxonomic Source(s): del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Identification information: 14 cm. Medium-sized warbler. Dull olive-and-brown, with pale, buffish-yellow underparts and obscure, buff eyebrow-stripe. Long, horn-coloured bill with flesh-coloured base. Blue-grey legs. Voice Melodious song and brisk chatter. Hints Easily seen on Cousin and Aride.

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Near Threatened ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: 2016-10-01
Assessor(s): BirdLife International
Reviewer(s): Butchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor(s): Lucking, R., McCulloch, N., Parr, S., Rocamora, G., Shah, N., Skerrett, A., Richardson, D., Brouwer, L. & Van der Woulde, J.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Ekstrom, J., Pilgrim, J., Shutes, S., Symes, A., Taylor, J., Warren, B., Ashpole, J, Westrip, J.
Justification:
This species is listed as Near Threatened. It is found on five islands and its population size is increasing owing to translocations and habitat management; there are not thought to be any threats that could drive the species to Critically Endangered or Extinct in a very short time (it almost meets the requirements for listing as threatened under criterion D2).

Previously published Red List assessments:

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:This species was present on several islands in the Seychelles until human disturbance in the 20th century reduced the species to one population on the tiny (0.3 km2) island of Cousin between 1920 and 1988 (Komdeur 2003). Prior to human colonisation it is thought that the species's range covered the inner granitic islands, with a population of approximately 20,000 individuals (Spurgin et al. 2014, D. S. Richardson in litt. 2015). It occurred historically on Marianne and Cousine (A. Skerrett in litt. 1999), and there are unconfirmed reports from Felicité (Komdeur 1996b, Dijkstra 1997). The population on Cousin was thought to have reached an all time low of less than 30 individuals in 1968 (but see Spurgin et al. 2014), but it has recovered following favourable management and conservation policies (Richardson et al. 2006), and the species has since been translocated to the islands of Aride, Cousine and Denis (Bristol 2005, Richardson et al. 2006) and most recently Frégate in 2011 (Wright et al. 2014b). 

In 1997, its population on Cousin was 323 birds and stable, and on Cousine and Aride 137 and 1,600 birds respectively, and increasing (Komdeur et al. 1997). In September 2005, the population on Cousin stood at 371 individuals, including 322 independent birds, and in August 2005 the population on Denis was 75 birds and increasing (Richardson et al. 2006). In 2007, the total population probably numbered over 2,500 birds (G. Rocamora in litt. 2007). In 2016 the population was estimated at c. 3,000 adults (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2016). Most recent population estimates for the five islands are: 320 on Cousin (Brouwer et al. 2006); 210 on Cousine (Van de Crommenacker and Richardson 2007); 1,850 on Aride (Orchard 2004); c.500 on Denis (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2016) and c.150 on Frégate (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2016). It is predicted that the populations on Denis and Frégate may eventually exceed 2,000 and 2,500 individuals respectively (Hammers and Richardson 2011, D. S. Richardson in litt. 2015), increasing the overall population to c. >6,500 individuals (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2015).

Countries occurrence:
Native:
Seychelles
Additional data:
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO):Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO):NoEstimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2:31
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO):UnknownExtreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO):No
Number of Locations:5Continuing decline in number of locations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations:No
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:In 2007, the population probably numbered over 2,500 birds (G. Rocamora in litt. 2007), roughly equivalent to a minimum of 1,700 mature individuals. Since 2007 the population has increased strongly with c. 2,800 adults in 2014 (N. Shah in litt. 2014) and c. 3,000 adults in August 2016 (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2016).

Trend Justification:  A population of 58 birds translocated to Denis in May and June 2004 had increased to 75 by August 2005 (Richardson et al. 2006), whilst the number of birds on Cousin increased from 323 in 1997 (Komdeur et al. 1997) to 371 in September 2005 (Richardson et al. 2006). The species is increasing as a result of habitat management and translocations, with the population recently estimated to be c. 3,000 adults (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2015).
Current Population Trend:Increasing
Additional data:
Number of mature individuals:3000Continuing decline of mature individuals:No
Extreme fluctuations:NoPopulation severely fragmented:No
No. of subpopulations:5Continuing decline in subpopulations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations:NoAll individuals in one subpopulation:No

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:It appears to prefer dense scrub vegetation or woodland dominated by large trees like Pisonia grandis and Ficus reflexa (G. Rocamora in litt. 2007, D. Richardson in litt. 2016). It is insectivorous, gleaning 98% of its insect food from leaves (1991). Males and females form long-term breeding pairs and are highly territorial year-round (Komdeur 1991), with a complex system of cooperative breeding and the ability to bias the sex ratio of offspring (Komdeur 1996a, Lloyd 1998). Although it can breed independently in its first year, some birds, mostly females, remain in their natal territory as subordinates and help to feed the young (Komdeur 2003), although some females may gain direct parentage by laying an egg in the nest of the dominant birds (Richardson et al. 2002). This system of cooperative breeding is thought to be a product of habitat saturation (Komdeur 1992). It usually has a one-egg clutch and high adult survival (Komdeur 1996b, Komdeur et al. 1997) (84% adult, and 61% juvenile survival [Brouwer et al. 2006]; average life expectancy at fledging 5.5 years [Komdeur and Daan 2005]). Pairs may reside in a territory for up to nine years (Komdeur 2003). The gender of the egg appears to be modified in reaction to territory quality and the need for new helpers (Komdeur 2003). The breeding success of pairs is highly dependent on the quality of territory (Komdeur 1992) as breeding sometimes continues year-round if insects are abundant (Komdeur 1996c, Dijkstra 1997). Breeding success also depends on population density with the number of fledglings produced decreasing with an increasing density, most likely acting through increased competition among individuals for food (Brouwer et al. 2009).

Most birds on Cousin breed during the south-east monsoon season (April-September), when the quality (foliage cover and insect availability) of most territories peaks, whilst most birds in territories in the south-east of the island breed every six months, both during the South-east monsoon season, when their territories are very poor quality and the north-west monsoon season (October-March) when the quality of their territories increases slightly (Komdeur and Daan 2005). This results in a main breeding season in June-August and a minor breeding season in December-February (Richardson et al. 2006). These patterns suggest that food availability and weather conditions primarily influence the timing of breeding on Cousin, with periodicity being a secondary factor (Komdeur and Daan 2005). Inter-island dispersal by the species is extremely rare, with only two out of 1,924 ringed birds (0.1%) known to have flown between islands, despite the species's physical adaptations for such flights, the saturation of Cousin, and the potential for higher reproductive success elsewhere (Komdeur 2003, Komdeur et al. 2004). This is perhaps because all islands previously occupied by the species were once saturated and such dispersal behaviour was not favoured (Komdeur 2003, Komdeur et al. 2004).

Systems:Terrestrial
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:Unknown
Generation Length (years):7.6
Movement patterns:Not a Migrant

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Habitat destruction and predation by introduced predators are thought to be the main reasons for its very limited range and extremely small population in the past. Seychelles Fody Foudia sechellarum and skinks take warbler eggs but it is unlikely that this is having a major impact on population levels (Komdeur et al. 1997, R. Lucking in litt. 1999). One threat identified on Denis island is that of nest predation by Common Myna Acridotheres tristis (D. Richardson in litt. 2016). When the nest is threatened by Mynas the female Seychelles warbler sits tight to protect her eggs. The Mynas then attack the female in order to get her off the nest, causing serious wound and thus increased female mortality. This has resulted in retarded population growth on Denis overall (J. Van der Woulde in litt. to D. Richardson 2015).

Genetic erosion through inbreeding is a possible future threat (Komdeur et al. 1997). The lack of inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice (Richardson et al. 2004) or dispersal patterns (Eikenaar et al. 2008) implies that inbreeding occurs in the Cousin population (Eikenaar et al. 2008), which can have negative effects on individual and offspring fitness (Richardson et al. 2004, Bebbington et al. 2016). Fewer breeding attempts occurred on Cousin in 2004 compared to 2003, probably owing, at least in part, to the scarcity of rain and the resulting decrease in foliage and insect abundance (Richardson et al. 2006), indicating that the species is vulnerable to relative drought. Avian malaria may affect survival (van Oers et al. 2010), but this pathogen has been (or is in the process of being) lost, probably due to a lack of the correct vectors, from all populations bar Cousin and Cousine (Fairfield et al. 2016). Given the limited genetic variation, and therefore, adaptive potential, in the Seychelles warbler (Spurgin et al. 2014) the main threat is new challenges to which the Seychelles warbler is naive. For example, the introduction of new pathogens to which is may not have any genetic resistance. Fortunately genetic variation (including immunological variation) has been retained though the successful translocations to maximise the adaptive potential on all islands (Wright et al. 2014a).

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Conservation and Research Actions Underway
The species's action plan aimed to increase its range to five islands and its population to over 3,000 individuals by 2006 (Richardson 2001, Bristol 2005). The spectacular recovery of this species has followed management of Cousin as a nature reserve, including the regeneration of Pisonia woodland, and cessation of intensive management of coconut Cocos nucifera plantations (Richardson et al. 2006). This resulted in territories reaching a saturation level of c. 115 in 1981 and the population reaching a carrying capacity of c.320 birds by 1982 (Komdeur 2003). A new management plan for Cousin has been drawn up, which continues to place a high priority on habitat management (Shah et al. 1999). Aride is also managed as a nature reserve. In 1988 and 1990 respectively, new populations were established by moving 29 birds to both Aride (9 km from Cousin) and Cousine (1.6 km from Cousin) (Komdeur 2003). By 2006, the populations on Aride and Cousine were close to their carrying capacities (Richardson et al. 2006, Brouwer et al. 2009). In May and June 2004, one month before the main breeding season, 58 subordinate individuals (27 females and 31 males) were moved from Cousin to Denis to establish a breeding population, following successful predator eradication and habitat management (Bristol 2005, Richardson et al. 2006). They were observed nest-building within three days of release (Richardson et al. 2006), and they have since bred successfully (Bristol 2005, Richardson et al. 2006). By August 2005, the population had increased to 75 birds (Richardson et al. 2006). The translocation left 35 vacant territories on Cousin, and all but three of these were occupied in an average of 5.4 days (range 1-20 days) by subordinate birds (Eikenaar et al. 2007). The most recent translocation took place in 2011 when 59 adult birds were moved from Cousin to Frégate (Wright et al. 2014b). The translocated population was monitored closely and by 2013 had increased to 80 individuals, of which 38 were the original translocated birds and 42 were hatched on Frégate, and in June 2016 the population was estimated at 150 individuals across 64 territories (D. Richardson 2016 in litt.). The source population on Cousin recovered to carrying capacity within one breeding season. The translocation to Frégate was funded by a Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund grant to Nature Seychelles through the RSPB, Seychelles Warbler Research Group (a collaboration between the University of East Anglia, University of Sheffield and the University of Groningen) and Frégate Island Private (Anon. 2012).

All populations are currently monitored by the Seychelles Warbler Project (Komdeur et al. 1997, Bristol 2005, Richardson et al. 2006), and research is being carried out on a range of evolutionary, ecological and conservation related topics. Key conservation related topics include the loss of genetic variation due to historical bottlenecks or translocations (Spurgin et al. 2014, Wright et al. 2014a) ageing (Barrett et al. 2013, Hammers et al. 2015) and the impact of pathogen infections (Hammers . 2016).

The population on Cousin has been intensively studied since 1985, whilst those on Aride, Cousine (Komdeur 2003), Denis (Richardson et al. 2006) and Frégate (Wright et al. 2014b) have been studied from establishment. Breeding ecology and behaviour is monitored annually for nearly all breeding attempts on Cousin (Komdeur 2003). Censuses on Denis and Frégate are planned for 2015 and 2016 respectively (D. S. Richardson in litt. 2015).

Conservation 
and Research Actions Proposed
Continue population monitoring, especially of the condition of individuals so that emerging threats can be rapidly detected (Komdeur et al. 1997, D. Richardson in litt. 2016). Continue to carry out research (Komdeur et al. 1997), including further investigations into the species's cooperative breeding behaviour (Komdeur 2003). Continue appropriate management and habitat conservation (Komdeur et al. 1997). Consider additional translocation to other islands, free from introduced predators (Komdeur et al. 1997). Ensure the introduced Common Myna is eradicated (D. Richardson in litt. 2016).

Classifications [top]

3. Shrubland -> 3.6. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:Yes
2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management
2. Land/water management -> 2.2. Invasive/problematic species control
3. Species management -> 3.2. Species recovery
3. Species management -> 3.3. Species re-introduction -> 3.3.2. Benign introduction

In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning
  Action Recovery plan:Yes
  Systematic monitoring scheme:Yes
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
  Conservation sites identified:Yes, over entire range
  Occur in at least one PA:Yes
  Invasive species control or prevention:No
In-Place Species Management
  Successfully reintroduced or introduced beningly:Yes
  Subject to ex-situ conservation:No
In-Place Education
  Subject to recent education and awareness programmes:No
  Included in international legislation:No
  Subject to any international management/trade controls:No
11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.1. Habitat shifting & alteration
♦ timing:Future ♦ scope:Whole (>90%) ♦ severity:Unknown ⇒ Impact score:Unknown 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.3. Indirect ecosystem effects

11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.2. Droughts
♦ timing:Past, Likely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.1. Annual & perennial non-timber crops -> 2.1.3. Agro-industry farming
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Plasmodium relictum ]
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Whole (>90%) ♦ severity:Unknown ⇒ Impact score:Unknown 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Felis catus ]
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Capra hircus ]
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Felis catus ]
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Canis familiaris ]
♦ timing:Past, Unlikely to Return ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Past Impact 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species [ Plasmodium relictum ]
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Unknown ♦ severity:Unknown ⇒ Impact score:Unknown 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.2. Problematic native species/diseases -> 8.2.1. Unspecified species
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.2. Problematic native species/diseases -> 8.2.2. Named species [ Foudia sechellarum ]
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.2. Problematic native species/diseases -> 8.2.2. Named species
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:No decline ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.2. Problematic native species/diseases -> 8.2.2. Named species [ Foudia sechellarum ]
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

1. Research -> 1.3. Life history & ecology
3. Monitoring -> 3.1. Population trends

Bibliography [top]

Anon. 2012. Seychelles warbler back from the brink. Wildlife Extra. Available at: http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/seychelles-warbler.html#cr. (Accessed: 21/09/2015).

Barrett, E. L. B.; Burke, T. A.; Hammers, M.; Komdeur, J.; Richardson, D. S. 2013. Telomere dynamics predict mortality in a life-long longitudinal wild study. Mol. Ecol. 22: 249-259.

Bebbington, K.; Spurgin, L. G.; Fairfield, E. A.; Dugdale, H. L.; Komdeur, J.; Burke, T.; Richardson, D. S. 2016. Telomere length reveals cumulative individual and transgenerational inbreeding effects in a passerine bird. Mol. Ecol.: DOI: 10.1111/mec.13670.

Bristol, R. 2005. Conservation introductions of Seychelles Fody and Warbler to Denis Island, Seychelles. Re-introduction News 24: 35-36.

Brouwer L., Richardson D.S., Eikenaar C. and Komdeur J. 2006. The role of group size and environmental factors on survival in a cooperatively breeding tropical passerine. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1321-1329.

Brouwer, L.; Tinbergen, J. M.; Both, C.; Bristol, R.; Richardson, D. S.; Komdeur, J. 2009. Experimental evidence for density-dependent reproduction in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Ecology 90: 729-741.

Collar, N. J.; Stuart, S. N. 1985. Threatened birds of Africa and related islands: the ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book. International Council for Bird Preservation, and International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Cambridge, U.K.

Dijkstra, S. 1997. Population dynamics and space use of the Seychelles Warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) on the plateau area of Aride Island, a saturated environment.

Eikenaar, C.; Komdeur, J.; Richardson, D. S. 2008. Natal dispersal patterns are not associated with inbreeding avoidance in the Seychelles Warbler. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1106-1116.

Eikenaar, C.; Richardson, D. S.; Brouwer, L.; Komdeur., J. 2007. Parent presence, delayed dispersal, and territory acquisition in the Seychelles warbler. Behav. Ecol. 18: 874-879.

Fairfield, E. A.; Hutchings, K.; Gilroy, D. L.; Kingma, S. A.; Burke, T.; Komdeur, J.; Richardson, D. S. 2016. The impact of conservation-driven translocations on blood parasite prevalence in the Seychelles warbler. Scientific Reports 6: 29596.

Hammers, M and Richardson, D.S. 2011. Assessment of the suitability of Frégate Island for Seychelles warblers (Acrocephalus sechellensis) 2011. University of Groningen/ University of East Anglia Report.

Hammers, M.; Kingma, S. A.; Bebbington, K.; van de Crommenacker, J.; Spurgin, L. G.; Richardson, D. S.; Burke, T.; Dugdale, H. L.; Komdeur, J. 2015. Senescence in the wild: Insights from a long-term study on Seychelles warblers. Experimental Gerontology 71: 69-79.

Hammers, M.; Komdeur, J.; Kingma, S. J.; Hutchings, K.; Fairfield, E. A.; Gilroy, D.; Richardson, D. S. 2016. Age-specific malaria infection dynamics and survival in Seychelles warblers. Scientific Reports 6: 29720.

IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 07 December 2016).

Komdeur, J. 1991. Cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.

Komdeur, J. 1992. Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles Warbler. Nature 358: 493-495.

Komdeur, J. 1996. Facultative sex ratio bias in the offspring of Seychelles Warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 263: 661.

Komdeur, J. 1996. Influence of helping and breeding experience on reproductive performance in the Seychelles warbler: a translocation experiment. Behavioral Ecology: 326-333.

Komdeur, J. 1996. Seasonal timing of reproduction in a tropical bird, the Seychelles Warbler: a field experiment using translocation. Journal of Biological Rhythms 11: 333-346.

Komdeur, J. 2003. Adaptations and maladaptations to island living in the Seychelles Warbler. Ornithological Science: 79-88.

Komdeur, J.; Blaakmeer, K.; Richardson, D. 1997. The Seychelles Warbler Acrocephalus seychellensis. In: Rocamora, G. (ed.), Rare and threatened species, sites and habitats monitoring programme in Seychelles. Project G1 EMPS, pp. 185-196. Ministry of Environment/Government of Seychelles/World Bank and Global Environment Facility, Mahé, Seychelles.

Komdeur, J.; Daan, S. 2005. Breeding in the monsoon: semi-annual reproduction in the Seychelles Warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Journal of Ornithology 146: 305-313.

Komdeur, J.; Piersma, T.; Kraaijeveld, K.; Kraaijeveld-Smit, F.; Richardson, D. 2004. Why Seychelles Warblers fail to recolonise nearby islands: unwilling or unable to fly there? Ibis 146: 298-302.

Lloyd, P. 1998. Sex ratios in Seychelles Warblers. Africa - Birds & Birding 3(3): 16.

Orchard, D. 2004. Aride Seychelles Warbler Census. In: Betts M. (ed.), Annual Report 2003, Aride Island Nature Reserve, Seychelles. Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts, Newark.

Richardson, D. S. 2001. Species Conservation Assessment and Action Plan: Seychelles warbler (Timerl Dezil). Joint report of Nature Seychelles, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

Richardson, D. S.; Bristol, R.; Shah, N. J. 2006. Translocation of the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis to establish a new population on Denis Island, Seychelles. Conservation Evidence 3: 54-57.

Richardson D. S.; Komdeur, J.; Burke, T. 2002. Direct benefits explain the evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warblers. Evolution 56: 2313-2321.

Richardson, D. S.; Komdeur, J.; Burke, T . 2004. Inbreeding in the Seychelles warbler: environment-dependent maternal effects. Evolution 58: 2037-2048.

Shah, N. J.; Pickup, T.; Parr, S. 1999. Cousin Island Special Reserve Site Management Plan 1999-2003.

Spurgin, L.G., Wright, D.J., Velde, M., Collar, N.J., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. and Richardson, D.S. 2014. Museum DNA reveals the demographic history of the endangered Seychelles warbler. Evolutionary Applications 7(9): 1134-1143.

Van de Crommenacker, J. and Richardson, D.S. 2007. Monitoring and Studying the Seychelles warbler: fieldwork on Cousine Island. University of Groningen, Groningen.

van Oers, K.; Richardson, D. S.; Sæther, S. A.; Komdeur, J. 2010. Reduced blood parasite prevalence with age in the Seychelles Warbler: selective mortality or suppression of infection? Journal of Ornithology 151(1): 69-77.

Wright, D.J., Shah, N.J. and Richardson, D.S. 2014b. Translocation of the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis to establish a new population on Frégate Island, Seychelles. Conservation Evidence 11: 20-24.

Wright, D. J.; Spurgin, L. G.; Collar, N. J.; Komdeur, J.; Burke, T.; Richardson, D. S. 2014a. The impact of translocations on neutral and functional genetic diversity within and among populations of the Seychelles warbler. Mol. Ecol. 23: 2165-2177.


Citation: BirdLife International. 2016. Acrocephalus sechellensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22714882A94431883. . Downloaded on 22 November 2017.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided