|Scientific Name:||Conus ardisiaceus|
|Species Authority:||Kiener, 1845|
|Taxonomic Notes:||The closest relative of this species occurs in southeastern Australian waters (C. papiliferus), which suggests that this may be a relictual species (G. Raybaudi pers. comm. October 2011).|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Vulnerable B1ab(v)+2ab(v) ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Peters, H. & Veldsman, S.G.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Peters, H., Bohm, M. & Howarth, L.|
This species is endemic to the reefs off Oman, ranging from Muscat south to the island of Al Masirah. It has a restricted range with an extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of less than 2,000 km2. It is likely to be vulnerable to threats from marine pollution, particularly from the petroleum industry, which is widespread in the area. Based on this threat, for which a single threatening event can potentially affect a large area, we infer an occurrence of no more than ten locations. The species was never abundant, but is very scarce now, so it is inferred that there has been a decline in the number of individuals which is likely to be ongoing since the causes are not fully understood and have therefore not been addressed. It is listed as Vulnerable.
|Range Description:||This species of cone snail is endemic to the coral reefs off Oman in the Arabian Sea, ranging from Muscat south to the island of Al Masirah (Röckel et al. 1995). This is a coastal distance of approx 700 km.|
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:||
Indian Ocean – western
|Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - km2:||1400|
|Number of Locations:||10|
|Lower depth limit (metres):||5|
|Upper depth limit (metres):||1|
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||There is no quantitative population information for this species. It was never abundant in the market, but is thought to be now very scarce based on reports from collection efforts by trained collectors, with only few juveniles found (G. Raybaudi pers. comm. October 2011). Latest reports from Masirah island suggest the species is very scarce here (G. Raybaudi pers. comm. October 2011).|
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||This species is known to occur in shallow water on coral reefs. Adults of the species will grow to approx 55 mm although they will typically be less than this (Röckel et al. 1995). It has a lecithotrophic larval development as inferred from protoconch, with individuals producing typically only 5 to 6 eggs per season.|
|Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:||Yes|
|Use and Trade:||
In common with all Conus spp, this species is traded for the collector market. There are no quantitative data available on the number of shells removed, however, this species is traded for prices typically at the high to medium end (Rice 2007). There is only limited availability of shells on the market which may indicate lack of abundance in the wild.
Oman is susceptible to the majority of threats faced by countries of the Arabian Sea (Sale et al. 2010). These include (i) chronic contamination of coastal waters due to the continuous discharge of oil from harbours, ballast water, terminals, and sewage-plant effluents (Madany et al. 1998); (ii) discharge of effluent from manufacturing industries including the discharge of heavy metals, oil and petroleum-based compounds, nutrients, and halogenated organics (Gevao et al. 2006); (iii) the clearing and alteration of habitats such as coral reefs, in particular, which have all been altered by coastal dredging and development for industrial, commercial, and residential use (Sheppard et al. 1992, 2010). The main threat affecting this species is pollution, particularly from the petroleum industry, because of the shallow water habitat in which it occurs.
The limited availability of shells in the collector market could be an indicator of lack of abundance in the wild, especially as this is a shallow water species and easily gathered.
|Conservation Actions:||This species is restricted in its range and very scarce in the market and would benefit from further research into populations, distribution, habitat, and threats before any action plan can be formulated. There are no known conservation measures currently in place for this species.|
Garber, G. & Arbor, A. 2005. Peptide leads new class of chronic pain drugs. Nature Biotechnology 23(4): 399.
Gevao, B., Beg, M.U., Al-Omair, A., Helaleh, M. & Zafar, J. 2006. Spatial distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls in coastal marine sediments receiving industrial effluents in Kuwait. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 50: 166-174.
IUCN. 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2013.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 12 June 2013).
Kohn, A. J. The Conus Biodiversity Website. Available at: http://biology.burke.washington.edu/conus/index.php. (Accessed: 01/03/2011).
Madany, I.M., A. Jaffar, & AI-Shirbini, E.S. 1998. Variations in the concentrations of aromatic petroleum hydrocarbons in Bahraini coastal waters during the period October 1993 to December 1995. Environment International 24: 61-66.
Rice, T. 2007. A Catalog of Dealers' Prices for Shells: Marine, Land and Freshwater. Sea and Shore Publications.
Röckel, D., Korn, W. & Kohn, A.J. 1995. Manual of the Living Conidae, Vol 1. Verlag Christa Hemmen.
Sale, P.F., Feary, D.A., Burt, J.A., Bauman, A.G., Cavalcante, G.H., Drouillard, B.K., Marquis, E., Tric, C.G., Usseglio, P. & Lavieren, H.V. 2011. The growing need for sustainable ecological management of marine communities of the Persian Gulf. AMBIO.
Sheppard, C., Al-Husiani, M., Al-Jamali, F., Al-Yamani, F., Baldwin, R., Bishop, J., Benzoni, F. and Dutrieux, E. 2010. The Gulf: A young sea in decline. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60: 13-38.
Sheppard, C.R.C., Price, A. and Roberts, C. 1992. Marine Ecology Of The Arabian Region: Patterns And Processes In Extreme Tropical Environments. Academic Press, London.
|Citation:||Raybaudi-Massilia, G. 2013. Conus ardisiaceus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T192852A2174430. . Downloaded on 25 May 2016.|