|Scientific Name:||Conus anabelae|
|Species Authority:||Rolán & Röckel, 2001|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Seddon, M. & Monnier, E.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Seddon, M. & Peters, H.|
This species has a range restricted to the Bay of Moçâmedes surrounding the town and port of Namibe. The port is the focus of potential large scale development with accompanying dredging. Such development might cause localized problems in the future, however, the port has been present for years so that in its current state it has not had an impact on the species. Oil prospecting has been carried out along Angola's coast and eventual oil exploration may have an effect on Angola's coast in the future, but there is no current development of these activities. At present, the species has been listed as Least Concern, however, should the threats start to impact the Bay, then a conservation re-assessment will be required to ensure the species will not be impacted.
|Range Description:||This species is endemic to the area surrounding Namibe (Moçâmedes) in the far south of Angola with Praia das Conchas to the north and Praia de Noronha to the south (Monteiro et al. 2004). Namibe is situated in Moçâmedes Bay with a coast of approximately 50-60 km to which the species is restricted.|
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:||
Atlantic – southeast
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||There are no records of population levels for this species in the literature.|
|Habitat and Ecology:||This species has been found buried in sand under rocks at shallow depths (Filmer 2001, amended 2009). It occurs in sympatry with C. filmeri. Adults reach approximately 20 mm length.|
|Use and Trade:||The shells of this species are traded for the specialist Conus shell market only. As a result, the level of off-take is low (M. J. Tenorio pers. comm. 2011).|
This species is endemic to Angola where it is restricted to a 50-60 km stretch of coastline. A major redevelopment of the Port of Namibe has been agreed, financed by the Government of Japan (www.dredgingtoday.com) that will entail large scale dredging of the area. Oil prospection has been going on along the Angolan coast, but there is no further development on this at the moment, so this is not considered a current threat; it may be more significant in the future if oil drilling commences (M. J. Tenorio and S. Veldsman pers. comm. 2011).
|Conservation Actions:||This species is restricted in its range and scarce in the market and would benefit from further research into abundance and threats (impacts of port development) before any action plan can be formulated. There are no known conservation measures currently in place for this species.|
Filmer, R.M. 2001. A Catalogue of Nomenclature and Taxonomy in the Living Conidae, 1758-1998. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2012.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 19 June 2012).
Monteiro, A., Tenorio, M.J. and Poppe, G.T. 2004. The Family Conidae, The West African and Mediterranean species of Conus. In: Poppe, G.T and Groh, K. (eds), A Conchological Iconography, pp. 270. ConchBooks, Hackenheim.
|Citation:||Tenorio, M.J. 2012. Conus anabelae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 28 January 2015.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|