|Scientific Name:||Ambystoma mexicanum|
|Species Authority:||(Shaw & Nodder, 1798)|
Gyrinus mexicanus Shaw and Nodder, 1798
|Taxonomic Source(s):||Frost, D.R. 2014. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6 (27 January 2014). New York, USA. Available at: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. (Accessed: 27 January 2014).|
|Taxonomic Notes:||The taxonomic validity of this species is confirmed, on the basis of morphology, allozymes, and mtDNA (H.B. Shaffer pers. comm.).|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Critically Endangered B2ab(iii,v) ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Luis Zambrano, Paola Mosig Reidl, Jeanne McKay, Richard Griffiths, Brad Shaffer, Oscar Flores-Villela, Gabriela Parra-Olea, David Wake|
|Reviewer(s):||Global Amphibian Assessment Coordinating Team (Simon Stuart, Janice Chanson, Neil Cox and Bruce Young)|
Listed as Critically Endangered because its Area of Occupancy is less than 10km2, its distribution is severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat and in the number of mature individuals.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
|Range Description:||This species is known only from central Mexico, on the southern edge of Mexico City, in canals and wetlands in the general vicinity of Xochimilco (including outside the Xochimilco city limits, around the Chalco wetland). The animals are not homogeneously distributed through their range, and congregate in particular places. Records from close to downtown Mexico City in the Chapultepec Lake could refer to either this species or Ambystoma velasci, and require confirmation. It was originally found in Lakes Xochimilco and Chalco (and presumably in the connecting lakes Texcoco and Zumpango), but it has disappeared from most of its range.|
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||The surviving wild population is very small. Although populations are difficult to assess, recent surveys covering almost all of its known distribution range have usually captured fewer than 100 individuals (e.g., during 2002 and 2003, more than 1,800 net casts were made along Xochimilco canals covering 39,173m² and this resulted in a catch of only 42 specimens). In a study covering a span of six years (from 1998 to 2004), axolotl density had reduced from 0.006-org/ m2 to 0.001-org/ m2, although it is thought that this reduction could also be due to its own population dynamics (Zambrano 2006). A recent scientific survey revealed no axolotls, although wild-caught animals are still found in the local market, which indicates that fishermen still know where to find them. There has not been a density study of the Chalco population, but evidence suggests that the population there is small and, furthermore, Chalco is a highly unstable system that runs the risk of disappearing in the near future.|
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||This species is native to the ancient system of water channels and lakes in Mexico City. It requires deep-water lakes (both natural and artificial canals) with abundant aquatic vegetation. Structures such as plants are needed to lay eggs. It is a paedomorphic species, living permanently in water, and does not undergo complete metamorphosis.|
|Use and Trade:||Wild harvest is small but not necessarily in relation to population size. There is a local illegal trade in wild-caught animals for human consumption, medicinal uses and pets. It is assumed that all international trade is now in captive-bred animals.|
|Major Threat(s):||The desiccation and pollution of the canal system and lakes in Xochimilco and Chalco, as a result of urbanization, as well as the traditional consumption of the species by local people, is threatening the survival of this species. Increased tourist activity is poorly regulated and adds further pollution (Zambrano, 2006). The species is also captured for medicinal purposes. The harvesting is targeted at animals that are less than one year old. It was formerly also captured for the international pet trade, although probably all animals in the international trade are now of captive origin. Introduced fishes (tilapia and carp) have increased to high abundances (a recent study collected 600kg of tilapia in one small channel using a 100m net) and have also impacted axolotls through competition and predation. The animals are also being affected by disease, probably spread by invasive species, and as a result of poor water quality. Although the water regime has changed in the last 10 years, and it is reported that pollution levels are decreasing, factors such as very high levels of bacterial contamination could still pose a serious threat.|
|Conservation Actions:||Conservation action is focusing on raising the profile of Lake Xochimilco through conservation education and a nature tourism initiative, coupled with work on habitat restoration and bioremediation. A species action plan has been drafted. There are several captive colonies around the world, since the species is used in physiological and biomedical research, as well as in the pet trade, but the re-introduction of captive-bred axolotls is not recommended until threats can be mitigated, and disease and genetic risks to the wild populations assessed. This species is protected under the category Pr (Special protection) by the Government of Mexico and is in process of being amended to a higher risk category. Although this species is currently on CITES Appendix II, it is currently under the process of "Periodic Review of species included in CITES Appendices".|
1989. Developmental Biology of the Axolotl. Oxford University Press, New York.
Brandon, R.A. 1972. Hybridization between the Mexican salamanders Ambystoma dumerilii and Ambystoma mexicanum under laboratory conditions. Herpetologica: 199-207.
Brandon, R.A. 1989. Natural history of the axolotl and its relationship to other ambystomatic salamanders. In: Armstrong, J.B. and Malacinski, G.M. (eds), Development Biology of the Axolotl., pp. 12-21. Oxford University Press, New York.
Graue, V. 1998. Estudio genético y demográfico de le población del anfibio Ambystoma mexicanum (Caudata: Ambystomatidae) del lago Xochimilco. Unpublished thesis, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
Griffiths, H.I. and Thomas, D.H. 1988. What is the status of the Mexican axolotl? British Herpetological Society Bulletin: 3-5.
Griffiths, R.A., Graue, V. and Bride, I.G. 2003. The axolotls of Lake Xochimilco: the evolution of a conservation programme. Axolotl News: 12-18.
Griffiths, R.A., Graue, V., Bride, I.G. and McKay, J.E. 2004. Conservation of the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) at Lake Xochimilco, Mexico. Herpetological Bulletin: 4-11.
Highton, R. 2000. Detecting cryptic species using allozyme data. In: Bruce, R.C., Jaeger, R.G. and Houck, L.D. (eds), The Biology of Plethodontid Salamanders, pp. 215-241. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.2). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 29 June 2010).
Jones, C. 2002. Water quality model for the reintroduction of the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) into the canals of Xochimilco, Mexico City. Unnpublished undergradualte honours theses, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada.
McKay, J.E. 2003. An evaluation of captive breeding and sustainable use of the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Kent, Canterbury, U.K.
Shaffer, H.B. 1984. Evolution in a paedomorphic lineage. I. An electrophoretic analysis of the Mexican ambystomatid salamanders. Evolution 38: 1194-1206.
Shaffer, H.B. 1984. Evolution in a paedomorphic lineage. II. Allometry and form in the Mexican ambystomatid salamanders. Evolution 38: 1207-1218.
Shaffer, H.B. 1989. Natural history and ecology of the Mexican axolotls. Axolotl News: 5-11.
Shaffer, H.B. 1993. Phylogenetics of model organisms: the laboratory axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Systematic Biology: 508-522.
Shaffer, H.B. and Lauder, G.V. 1985. Patterns of variation in aquatic ambystomatid salamanders: kinematics of the feeding mechanism. Evolution: 83-92.
Smith, H.B. 1989. Discovery of the axolotl and its early history in biological research. In: Armstrong, J.B. and Malacinski, G.M. (eds), Developmental Biology of the Axolotl, pp. 3-12. Oxford University Press, New York.
Smith, H.B. 1989. The axolotl in its native habitat. Axolotl News: 12-17.
Vergara, G. 1990. Contribución al estudio histológico del aparato reproductor masculino del anfibio urodelo Ambystoma mexicanum. Unpublished thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
Zambrano, L. 2006. The Mexican Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum).
Zambrano, L., Reynoso, V.H. and Herrera, G. 2004. Abundancia y estructura poblacional del axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) en los sistemas dulceacuícolas de Xochimilco y Chalco. Unpublished report, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Base de datos SNIB-Conabio proyecto AS004., Mexico City.
|Citation:||Luis Zambrano, Paola Mosig Reidl, Jeanne McKay, Richard Griffiths, Brad Shaffer, Oscar Flores-Villela, Gabriela Parra-Olea, David Wake. 2010. Ambystoma mexicanum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T1095A3229615.Downloaded on 24 October 2016.|