|Scientific Name:||Pterodroma incerta|
|Species Authority:||(Schlegel, 1863)|
|Taxonomic Source(s):||del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.|
|Identification information:||43 cm. Large, stocky, dark brown-and-white petrel. Uniformly dark chocolate-brown above and on upper breast. Head can appear grey in worn plumage. Sharp demarcation from brown upper breast to white lower breast and belly. Brown vent, undertail-coverts and tail. Uniform brown underwing. Similar spp. Soft-plumaged Petrel P. mollis has patterned underwing. Trindade Petrel P. arminjoniana has white wing flashes. Hints May flap at top of glides unlike most Pterodroma spp. Concentrates around subtropical convergence.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Endangered B2ab(v) ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Butchart, S. & Symes, A.|
|Contributor(s):||Bond, A., Bourgeois, K., Bugoni, L., Cuthbert, R., Hilton, G., Ryan, P.G. & Wanless, R.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Clay, R., Ekstrom, J., McClellan, R., Moreno, R., Shutes, S., Stattersfield, A. & Temple, H.|
This species has been listed as Endangered because it has an extremely small occupied breeding range, and there is now evidence that chick predation by introduced mice is causing very low breeding success and is likely to be causing the population to decline. It has not been recorded from Tristan de Cunha for 35 years, and, were it to be confirmed as extinct there, it may qualify for uplisting to Critically Endangered.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
Pterodroma incerta breeds only on Gough Island, Tristan da Cunha (St Helena to UK). It is absent from Nightingale where there is no suitable habitat, and probably also from Inaccessible, although it is possible that a small number of birds could breed there because there have been no surveys during the winter breeding season (P. G. Ryan in litt. 1999), and Tristan, where though the population was estimated to be 100-200 pairs in 1972-1974, and there may only be a few scattered pairs remaining. On Gough, the first quantitative population estimate indicates a total of around 1.8 million pairs (Cuthbert 2004), considerably larger than the earlier estimate of at least 20,000 pairs (P. G. Ryan in litt. 1999). However, a recent estimate that takes into account occupancy rates of burrows suitable for the species halves this number, indicating a population size of 860,000 pairs varying between 630,000 and 1,100,000 pairs (Rexer-Huber et al. 2014). Several studies revealed very low breeding success: less than 20% (Cuthbert and Hilton 2004, Wanless et al. 2007, Dilley et al. 2015). At sea, it is practically restricted to the South Atlantic, occurring off the east coast of South America to the west coast of Africa (Enticott 1991, P. G. Ryan in litt. 1999), occasionally rounding the Cape of Good Hope into the Indian Ocean (Hobbs in litt. 2009).
Native:Argentina; Brazil; Falkland Islands (Malvinas); Namibia; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha (Tristan da Cunha); South Africa; Uruguay
Vagrant:Antarctica; Israel; Jordan; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
On Gough, Cuthbert (2004) estimated 1.8 million breeding pairs in 2001, suggesting a world population of around 5 million birds. The population size was re-estimated by Rexer-Huber et al. (2014), taking into account the occupancy rates of suitable burrows in 2010 and 2012. This new estimate indicates a population size of 860,000 pairs varying between 630,000 and 1,100,000 pairs. Because occupancy rates varied interannually, the species’ total breeding area was only estimated crudely, and burrow densities were assumed to be similar throughout the habitat, this estimate should be treated with caution. However, stochastic population models computing a modelled breeding success of 24.7% and parameters estimated for other gadfly petrels (adult survival = 93%, immature survival = 79% and recruitment age = 6 years) suggested population decline of 0.7% per annum (Wanless et al. 2012). Given that breeding success seems to be even lower (less than 20%; Cuthbert and Hilton 2004, Wanless et al. 2012, Dilley et al. 2015) and that adult and immature survival rates were probably over-estimated as they were those from gadfly species not exposed to predation by subantarctic skuas Catharacta antarctica, the population might be decreasing at a faster rate.
Trend Justification: Stochastic population models computing a modelled breeding success of 24.7% and parameters estimated for other gadfly petrels (adult survival = 93%, immature survival = 79% and recruitment age = 6 years) suggested population decline of 0.7% per annum (Wanless et al. 2012).
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||It feeds mainly on squid with some fish and crustaceans (Klages and Cooper 1997). It nests in burrows dug in peaty soils in fern-bush vegetation from 50-300 m on Gough and formerly, at higher elevations on Tristan. Nothing is known of age of first breeding, breeding frequency or survival (P. G. Ryan in litt. 1999). Heavily affected by Hurricane Catarina in March 2004, 354 birds were recorded blown inland, all in heavy moult and near starvation (Bugoni et al. 2007). Larger numbers of females among these were thought to be due to difference in at-sea distribution or in body condition (Bugoni et al. 2007). Evidence suggests moult is completed during exodus period and before egg-laying, which occurs from 15 June to 21 July (Cuthbert 2004).|
|Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:||Unknown|
|Generation Length (years):||15.6|
|Movement patterns:||Full Migrant|
|Congregatory:||Congregatory (and dispersive)|
|Major Threat(s):||This species was once of major economic importance to the Tristan Islanders as it was one of the few sources of food in winter but, by the 1940s, the birds had become scarce (Richardson 1984). It is very unlikely to be exploited today (P. G. Ryan in litt. 1999, A. Bond in litt. 2016). On Tristan, rats and mice are present and have probably driven it to extinction (Richardson 1984, R. Wanless et al. 2012). On Gough, the only threat is an introduced predator, the house mouse Mus musculus and recent research reveals that mice are predating chicks and causing very low breeding success which is driving the long-term decline (Cuthbert and Hilton 2004, Wanless et al. 2007, Wanless et al. 2012, Cuthbert et al. 2013, Dilley et al. 2015). The large population of native Southern Skua Stercorarius antarcticus feed on seabirds including P. incerta (Richardson 1984). Night strikes (as a result of being attracted to lights) are a further threat. This has been ameliorated at the Gough meteorological station, but may still pose a problem on ships at sea (Glass and Ryan 2013). The mortality associated with Hurricane Catarina points to a potential threat from hurricane activity in the South Atlantic, postulated to increase in frequency with global warming (Bugoni et al. 2007).|
Conservation Actions Underway
Conservation Actions Proposed
|Citation:||BirdLife International. 2016. Pterodroma incerta. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22698084A95224555.Downloaded on 20 February 2017.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|