Pterodroma sandwichensis 

Scope: Global
Language: English

Translate page into:

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Procellariiformes Procellariidae

Scientific Name: Pterodroma sandwichensis
Species Authority: (Ridgway, 1884)
Common Name(s):
English Hawaiian Petrel
Spanish Petrel hawaiano
Taxonomic Source(s): del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Identification information: 43 cm. Large, dark grey-brown and white petrel. Dark black-brown cap extends below eye and also forms half collar across upper breast. Remainder of head white, forehead conspicuously so. Upperparts, including upperwing and tail, darkish grey-brown without "M" pattern. Many, but not all, show white patches on side of rump. White underwing with narrow black trailing edge, black tip, broad black edge between primaries and carpal joint. Band extends weakly towards centre of wing from joint. Similar spp. Compared to Juan Fernandez Petrel P. externa and White-necked Petrel P. cervicalis darker, with more extensive cap, darker back, lacking "M", and different underwing. Compared to Galápagos Petrel P. phaeopygia lacks black forehead markings. Voice Low-pitched, gurgling goo-oooo-gouih-gouih-gooo-o. On L`i, approximately 12 different vocalizations are known through the Hawaiian language, `ua`u, including u-u-u, ur-ur-ur, e-che-che-che and ur-ur-ah-ah-ah (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). During pair flying behaviour, one bird may give an u-u-u call, followed immediately by a rapid ch-ch-ch from the other bird (J. Penniman in litt. 2007).

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Vulnerable B2ab(iv,v) ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: 2016-10-01
Assessor(s): BirdLife International
Reviewer(s): Butchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor(s): Ainley, D., Baicich, P., Baker, P.E., Holmes, T., Morin, M., Penniman, J. & Wilson, A.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Anderson, O., Benstead, P., Isherwood, I., Stattersfield, A., Stuart, T., Taylor, J. & Temple, H.
This species qualifies as Vulnerable because it has a very small breeding range. It is known from five locations in the main Hawaiian islands, and the future of at least two are in jeopardy (Mauna Loa and West Maui). Its limited distribution and declines primarily result from predation by introduced mammals and urbanisation.

Previously published Red List assessments:

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:

Pterodroma sandwichensis ranges in the central Pacific and breeds on the Hawaiian Islands (USA), where an estimate, supported by pelagic surveys, put the total population at 19,000 (range 10,600-34,400), including a best estimate of 4,500-5,000 breeding pairs (Spear et al. 1995, Ainley et al. 1997a). There are approximately 2547 known burrows within Haleakalā National Park (Haleakalā National Park, unpublished data, 2015), and two small colonies are present in the West Maui Mountains but they are so far unquantified (Cooper and Day 2003, J. Penniman in litt. 2007), with numbers perhaps in the tens or low hundreds (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). On Hawai`i, small numbers breed on Mauna Kea and 40-50 pairs were present on Mauna Loa prior to 1995 (Ainley et al. 1997a, Simons and Hodges 1998). On Kaua`i, 1,600 pairs are indicated by observations of birds at a rafting site (Ainley et al. 1997a). On Moloka`i, 5-10 birds were heard calling in 1980, suggesting small numbers (Simons and Hodges 1998), but there has not been a concerted effort to estimate numbers on this island (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Surveys in 2006-2007 located a colony in the cloud forests of Lana`ihale on the north side of Lâna`i (P. Baicich in litt. 2007, A. Wilson in litt. 2007). This population probably numbers several thousand birds, based on the volume of calling during night time listening surveys in April and May along the Lana`ihale ridge at the highest point in the uplands, although only 14 burrows had been found by October 2007 (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). Surveys have so far been hampered by weather conditions and the risk of habitat disturbance (J. Penniman in litt. 2007).
Countries occurrence:
United States (Hawaiian Is.)
Indonesia; Japan; Philippines
Present - origin uncertain:
French Polynesia; Kiribati; United States Minor Outlying Islands
Additional data:
Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - km2:370Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO):Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO):NoEstimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2:22000000
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO):UnknownExtreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO):No
Number of Locations:6-10Continuing decline in number of locations:Yes
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations:NoLower elevation limit (metres):850
Upper elevation limit (metres):3000
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:Spear et al. (1995) give a best estimate of 3,750-4,500 breeding pairs based on at-sea surveys. This roughly equates to 6,000-11,000 mature individuals, and 9,000-16,600 individuals in total. However, the discovery of possibly several thousand birds breeding on Lana`i during terrestrial surveys in 2006-2007 and two small colonies on West Maui (J. Penniman in litt. 2007), probably in the tens or low hundreds of birds (D. Ainley in litt. 2007), brings the estimated breeding population close to the upper estimate of 6,500-8,300 pairs calculated by Spear et al. (1995).

Trend Justification:  A standard population monitoring technique has not yet been fully developed for use across colonies and survey sites. However, efforts are underway among collaborating scientists to standardize metrics and procedures so that population trends can be monitored more effectively on each of the islands. Pterodroma sandwichensis is suspected to have declined severely for the past few centuries owing primarily to predation by introduced species at nesting colonies and urbanization (D. Ainley 2007); as well as collisions with utility structures and power lines. However, the decline is believed to have slowed and there is some indication that the population may be stable or increasing in response to management actions (D. Ainley 2007). Despite overall trends and, as evidenced by characteristics of the decline seen at the Makamakaole colony in the foothills of the West Maui Mountains, the rate of subpopulation decline probably varies considerably and is difficult to quantify. On Kaua’i the population has declined significantly in the last twenty years (Raine et al. in prep.). 

Current Population Trend:Decreasing
Additional data:
Number of mature individuals:6000-11000Continuing decline of mature individuals:Yes
Extreme fluctuations:NoPopulation severely fragmented:No
No. of subpopulations:5Continuing decline in subpopulations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations:NoAll individuals in one subpopulation:No

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:On Maui, Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa, nesting takes place mainly between 2,000 and 3,000 m, in lava cavities with little vegetation nearby (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Elsewhere, for example West Maui (J. Penniman in litt. 2007) and Kaua`i (N. Holmes in litt. 2007), it nests at lower elevations, amongst dense shrubs and ferns (D. Ainley in litt. 2007), or in native grasslands with bracken (Ainley et al. 1997a, Simons and Hodges 1998, P. Baker in litt. 1999). On Haleakalā, Maui, birds nest in rock crevices and tunnels that are over 0.5 m deep, often exceeding two metres (Simons and Hodges 1998, J. Penniman in litt. 2007). Pairs nest in cavities in the volcanic terrain, in burrows beneath rocks or at the base of clay cliffs (N. Holmes in litt. 2007). At lower altitudes, they excavate burrows or nest in cavities often at the base of trees (Simons and Hodges 1998, P. Baker in litt. 1999, N. Holmes in litt. 2007), although many burrows on Lâna`i are not at the base of trees (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). On Lâna`i birds breed in dense uluhe fern habitat (Dicranopteris linearis and Diplopterygium pinnatum) and start breeding in March whereas on Haleakalā, Maui, birds begin breeding in mid-February (Penniman et al. 2008). On Kauai, birds breed in montane wet forests, where burrows are located along ridgelines in predominantly native forest, often at the base of large trees. On average, birds take five to six years to reach maturity but begin visiting colonies to establish pair bonds and prospect nesting sites at 2-3 years (Hess and Banko 2006). Most eggs are laid in May and June, with most young fledging by December (Mitchell et al. 2005). Birds nesting at higher elevations appear to finish provisioning chicks earlier with most birds having departed the colony at Haleakala by the end of October. The diet comprises mostly fish and squid, with squid constituting c.50-75% of the food ingested (Simons and Hodges 1998). Satellite telemetry studies reveal that provisioning adults are able to utilize the dynamic wind fields generated by the North Pacific gyre to efficiently reach foraging areas in the Gulf of Alaska and in the vicinity of the Aleutian Islands (Adams & Flora, 2009). P. sandwichensis regularly is observed foraging in mixed species flocks in association with predatory fish species that help drive prey to the surface (H. T. Harvey and Associates 2015, Mitchell et al. 2005). 

Systems:Terrestrial; Marine
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:Unknown
Generation Length (years):19.8
Movement patterns:Full Migrant
Congregatory:Congregatory (and dispersive)

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Historically the species suffered declines through harvesting by early Polynesians and during the period of Hawaiian settlement beginning c.1,800 years ago (Carlile et al. 2003). The species may already have been restricted to its current breeding range when Europeans arrived (Carlile et al. 2003). Nesting habitat has since been lost to the pressures of modern urbanisation and degraded by feral goats and pigs and weeds. Nest burrows are trampled by feral goats, mouflon sheep and potentially chital Axis deer (spp.) (H. T. Harvey and Associates 2015, Mitchell et al. 2005). The most serious current threat is predation by introduced vertebrates including Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus, feral cats, Barn Owls Tyto alba, rats, dogs, and pigs; presently not established on the islands of Kauai and Lanai, mongoose present an ongoing major threat to nestling and adult birds at breeding colonies on the other islands. Feral cat and rat depredation, where unmanaged on other islands, continues to limit recovery capacity. Adults and nestlings are very susceptible to predation, as nests are on the ground, and they are naïve to predators. On Lāna’i, habitat degradation caused by the invasive tree, strawberry guava Psidium cattleianum, is considered to be the biggest threat to the long term survival of the colony (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). Each autumn during the fledging season, some of the fledgling birds become grounded as a result of light attraction and disorientation. Sometimes birds collide with sources of light and mortality sometimes occurs from collisions with fences and powerlines mostly on Kauai and Maui (Cooper and Day 1998, Simons and Hodges 1998, Simons 1985). Once on the ground, fledglings are unable to fly and are killed by cars, cats and dogs, die from environmental exposure or injuries, or are recovered by the public (H. T. Harvey and Associates 2015). Wind energy development has been occurring in Hawaii since 2005 and has caused some mortality of P. sandwichensis. The species may be adversely affected by declines in the populations of large predatory fish that drive prey species to the surface (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). In addition, a significantly lower percentage of birds come ashore to nest during El Niño years (c.40% compared to c.65% normally) (C.N. Hodges per Carlile et al. 2003), suggesting that the species is sensitive to such disturbances in environmental conditions (Carlile et al. 2003). 

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Conservation Actions Underway
CMS Appendix I. On Maui, there is a long-term monitoring programme in the Haleakala National Park (Simons and Hodges 1998) and efforts are made to control introduced mammals. In 1976, a perimeter fence was put up around the main colony to exclude feral goats and pigs from the habitat (Carlile et al. 2003). The predator exclosures placed around the national park may have facilitated an increase in the number of birds in eastern Maui (Cooper and Day 2003). The trapping of rats started in 1968, and since 1997 rodenticides have been used (Carlile et al. 2003). Cats and mongooses have been controlled since 1981, and trapping of these species and rats continues to be carried out year-round (Carlile et al. 2003). On Lâna`i: colony delineation surveys are continuing (J. Penniman in litt. 2007), and as burrows are found they are included in basic breeding biology study; feral cats are being trapped and removed; studies on Tyto alba are being designed; a rat population assessment was due to begin in 2007, with control by rodenticide to be carried out subsequently; habitat restoration work may begin in January 2008; and public education projects will be implemented in 2008 (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). In 2006, a fence was completed to encircle a large portion of the breeding habitat on Lâna`i; the purpose was to exclude ungulates that damage the vegetation thus impacting the island's water supply (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Simultaneously, a limited cat-trapping programme has been initiated in the fenced area (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). On Maui, Lâna`i, and Kaua`i, grounded fledglings are collected and released, although the benefit of doing this has yet to be confirmed as very few banded individuals have subsequently been encountered (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Fencing erected for forest conservation has been modified to reduce collisions (Simons and Hodges 1998). On Kaua`i, auditory surveys to detect colonies are ongoing, and have included documenting the first known nesting sites on Kaua`i in the Upper Limahuli Preserve (N. Holmes in litt. 2007). Also on Kaua`i, street lighting is shielded in critical areas and lighting on some buildings has been modified to reduce collisions (Ainley et al. 1997b, Simons and Hodges 1998). A ruling brought by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2006, under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, has enforced a campaign running since 2005, in which all non-essential lights on Kaua`i are required to be turned off or shielded between 15 September and 15 December when young birds leave their nests (Appel 2006). The island's electricity company is helping by darkening all of its 3,000 street lights, and shielding or turning some of them off. The company has also fitted large balls to power lines in an effort to reduce the number of birds that collide with the cables (Appel 2006). Significant improvements have beem made in reducing light attraction and collision, although there is still a considerable amount of new and existing infrastructure that requires modification (N. Holmes in litt. 2007). Methods are currently being developed to quantify the population on each island; surveys for colonies on West Maui are being carried out and surveys on Moloka`i were planned to begin in Spring 2008 (J. Penniman in litt. 2007).

Conservation Actions Proposed
Improve radar sampling for use as a population monitoring technique (D. Ainley in litt. 2007, J. Penniman in litt. 2007). Use passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to study colony attendance by breeding pairs (J. Penniman in litt. 2007). Reduce collisions with power lines by making them more visible, burying them or moving them further inland where birds fly higher (Cooper and Day 1998). Ensure lighting does not attract petrels (Ainley et al. 1997b). Control predators in known colonies (M. Morin in litt. 2000), and improve measures for the declining colonies at Mauna Loa, Hawai`i (Carlile et al. 2003) and West Maui (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Monitor breeding success (Carlile et al. 2003). Continue to retrieve grounded birds (Carlile et al. 2003), but conduct research to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation methods (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Continue to search for additional breeding areas (Carlile et al. 2003). Carry out further research into foraging range and feeding behaviour and investigate the species's vulnerability to human-induced mortality at sea (Carlile et al. 2003). Investigate the impact of the loss of tuna schools that the species depends upon for foraging (D. Ainley in litt. 2007). Undertake research into the potential effects of climate change on the species (Carlile et al. 2003).

Citation: BirdLife International. 2016. Pterodroma sandwichensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22698017A93654585. . Downloaded on 22 January 2017.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided