|Scientific Name:||Eudyptes pachyrhynchus Gray, 1845|
|Taxonomic Source(s):||del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.|
|Identification information:||60 cm. Medium-sized, yellow-crested, black-and-white penguin. Dark, bluish-grey upperparts. Darker head. Broad yellow eyebrow-stripe that drops down neck. Most have 3-6 whitish stripes on cheeks. Similar spp. Only crested penguin with white stripes. Snares Island Penguin E. robustus has pink skin at base of bill. Erect-crested Penguin E. sclateri has erect crest. Rockhopper Penguin E. chrysocome has crest that begins with thin eyebrow-stripe.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Vulnerable A2be+3bce+4bce; C1+2a(i) ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Butchart, S. & Symes, A.|
|Contributor(s):||Ellenberg, U., Long, R., Mattern, T., Otley, H., Seddon, P., Taylor, G.A., Webster, T., Wilson, K. & van Heezik, Y.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Allinson, T, Benstead, P., Mahood, S., Mattern, T., McClellan, R., Moreno, R., Seddon, P., Taylor, J.|
This species qualifies as Vulnerable because it has a small population which is estimated to have undergone a continuing rapid reduction over the last three generations, based on trend data from a few sites and a variety of threats, especially introduced predators, and this negative trend is projected to continue.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
Eudyptes pachyrhynchus nests on Stewart Island and several of its offshore islands, Solander Island and on the west to south-west coast of the South Island, New Zealand. Based on data compiled in Mattern (2013) and a recent survey (Long 2014), the breeding population ranges between 4,400 and 5,600 birds. Non-breeding dispersal patterns at sea are largely unknown.
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
The population has been estimated at c.5,500-7,000 mature individuals (Mattern 2013, Long 2014). Due to the cryptic breeding habit and resulting difficulty of surveying the species, this number is likely to be an underestimate (Mattern 2013). At some sites numbers appear to have declined, while slightly increasing numbers have been reported from others making it difficult to identify clear species-wide population trends (Mattern 2013). At Open Bay Island, there was a decline of 33% between 1988 and 1995 (Ellis et al. 1998), and at Dusky Sound there were anecdotal reports of "thousands" of birds in 1900, but only a few hundred remained in the 1990s (Russ et al. 1992).
Trend Justification: Introduced predators, human disturbance and accidental deaths caused by fisheries are all contributing to an on-going decline in this species's population. Recent historical counts used unstandardised methods and results are hard to interpret, so further research is urgently needed.
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||It breeds in loose colonies along stretches of coastline in habitats ranging from mature temperate rainforest and dense scrub, to coastal caves and rocky shorelines. Penguins arrive at their breeding sites from mid-June onwards, with most nests established by mid-July. Two eggs are laid, which are incubated by both parents and hatch after 33 days (Warham 1974). Chicks fledge around mid- to late November. A diet study on the West Coast found that penguins brought predominantly squid (85%) ashore, followed by krill (13%) and fish (2%) (van Heezik 1989). Penguins from Codfish Island, took primarily fish (85%) and squid (15%) (van Heezik 1990). While breeding the penguins show site-dependent differences in foraging ranges, with birds from the Jackson Head, West Coast foraging within 20-100 km radii from their breeding colonies, while penguins breeding in Milford Sound remained within the fiord most of the time (foraging radius <10 km) (Mattern and Ellenberg 2016).|
|Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:||No|
|Generation Length (years):||9.6|
|Movement patterns:||Full Migrant|
|Congregatory:||Congregatory (and dispersive)|
|Major Threat(s):||Introduced terrestrial predators are an eminent threat. Stoats Mustela erminea have been found to predate Fiordland penguin chicks (Wilson and Long 2015). Other predators include dogs (particularly when moulting adults are confined ashore for 20-30 days), cats, and rats (Marchant and Higgins 1990, Mattern 2013). Birds are disturbed by humans at nest-sites (Ellenberg et al. 2015), killed on roads, and can be accidentally captured in gill-nets (Mattern 2013). Squid fisheries potentially compete for food (Ellis et al. 1998). Pollution could become a major threat if proposed deep-sea oil exploration off the West Coast proceeds (Mattern 2013). El Niño events were found to have a detrimental effect on the breeding success of Fiordland penguins from the West Coast, although penguins breeding in Fiordland seem to be less affected by the climate phenomenon (Mattern and Ellenberg 2016).|
Conservation Actions Underway
The NZ Department of Conservation (DOC) has established a Fiordland penguin Recovery Strategy 2012-17 plan that includes continued population monitoring at representative sites, implementation of island biosecurity measures, and the investigation of effects of predator control (DOC 2012). Several major research projects have been established since 2014. Between 2014 and 2019, the marine ecology (foraging ranges, diving behaviour, diet composition) of breeding Fiordland penguins is being studied across their entire breeding range; the project will also investigate the pre-moult dispersal of adult penguins (Mattern and Ellenberg 2016). The species’ winter migration will be investigated between 2016 and 2021 (S. Waugh, pers. comm.). A video monitoring study examines the impact of introduced terrestrial predators on breeding Fiordland penguins (Wilson & Long 2015). The Department of Conservation continues its monitoring program at various monitoring sites throughout the species breeding range (Ellenberg et al. 2015).
Conservation Actions Proposed
To expand the use of standardized census methods (Ellenberg et al. 2015) and to survey areas of coastline not surveyed in the 1990s (Ellis et al. 1998). Predator eradication/control – particularly mustelids – is necessary to prevent reproductive failure and mortality (Mattern 2013). Establish guidelines to control visitor access to colonies. Obtain legal protection for accessible colony sites (Taylor 2000).
|Citation:||BirdLife International. 2016. Eudyptes pachyrhynchus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22697776A93638571.Downloaded on 23 September 2017.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|