|
|
Dugong dugon
– Vulnerable
Taxonomy
|
Kingdom:
|
ANIMALIA
|
|
Phylum:
|
CHORDATA
|
|
Class:
|
MAMMALIA
|
|
Order:
|
SIRENIA
|
|
Family:
|
DUGONGIDAE
|
|
Scientific Name:
|
Dugong dugon
|
|
Species Authority:
|
(Müller, 1776)
|
|
Common Name/s:
|
| English | — | DUGONG, SEA COW |
| French | — | DUGONG |
| Spanish | — | DUGONG, DUGON |
|
Assessment Information
|
Red List Category & Criteria:
|
VU A2bcd ver 3.1 (2001)
|
|
Year Assessed:
|
2006
|
|
Assessor/s:
|
Marsh, H.
|
|
Evaluator/s:
|
Reynolds, J., Powell, J. & the IUCN/SSC Sirenia Specialist Group
|
|
Justification:
|
Follow the link below for the tables referred to in the text.
The dugong’s range spans at least 48 countries and an estimated 140,000 km of coastline. We have used two relatively crude relative indices of extent of occurrence: (1) length of coastline, and (2) area of continental shelf with a depth of <10 m. We then assembled the evidence for all countries in the dugong’s range based on the review of the status of the dugong throughout its range conducted in 2002 with the assistance of more than 100 experts (Marsh et al. 2002) plus additional literature published since that time (see tables 1.1 and 1.2). The results of this synthesis are summarized in table 2.1. This synthesis indicates that the dugong is declining or extinct in at least a third of its range, of unknown status in about half its range and possibly stable in the remainder – mainly the remote coasts of the Northern Territory and Western Australia.
The only reference site is the urban coast of Queensland where the most robust quantitative data on population trends are available and a 40 year time series of catch rates in nets set for bather protection indicates that the CPUE in 1999 was only 3% of that in 1962 (Marsh et al. 2005). This CPUE is considered an index of dugong decline in the region from all causes during this period. This decline and modern aerial survey estimates of dugong abundance were used to hindcast the population in the region in the early 1906s (which would be expected to have been lower than that at the time of European settlement as a cottage commercial industry for dugong oil had existed at several locations along this coast since the 1850s. The extrapolation suggested that the region supported 72,000 (95%CI 31,000, 165,000) dugongs in the early 1960s compared with an estimated 4,220 (95%CI 2,360, 8,360) dugongs in the mid 1990s. The seagrass habitat in the region is currently insufficient to support 72,000 dugongs, a result which suggests that the habitat had also declined (unlikely) or that the shark net CPUE has overestimated the decline (see Marsh et al. 2005). If the magnitude of this decline was robust and typical of the entire range of the dugong, the dugong would qualify for being classified as Critically Endangered at a global scale.
As summarized in table 2.1, the major causes of the dugong’s decline along the urban coast of Queensland are still present in most of the dugong’s range as follows: gill netting 87-99%, subsistence hunting 85-98%, human settlement 82-85%, agricultural pollution 80-89%. The magnitude of these threats is likely to be greater in most other parts of the dugong’s range than in Queensland. The Queensland coast supports a low human population density relative to most other parts of the dugong’s range and has a well developed system of marine parks and pro-active management. There is also anecdotal evidence that the area of occupancy of the dugong has declined in many parts of its range, especially along the coasts of east African and India where anecdotal evidence suggests that it is at high risk of extinction.
Even in the regions where we have classified the status of the dugong as stable, this classification is unconfirmed. Much of the northern Western Australian and some of the Northern Territory coast has never been surveyed for dugongs and there are no accurate estimates of the Indigenous harvest. The sustainability of this harvest must be questioned as it has been shown to be unsustainable by population modeling in remote parts of Queensland and Torres Strait (Heinsohn et al. 2004, Marsh et al. 2004).
Genetic information on dugong stocks is limited. Recent work based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers (Brenda McDonald, unpublished data) indicates that the Australian dugong population is not panmictic. There is clear evidence of two maternal lineages, which have a geographical basis apparently reflecting the existence of the Torres Strait land bridge between Australia and PNG, despite the flooding of this land bridge some six thousand years ago. The Australian dugong population still has a fair degree of genetic diversity indicating that recent losses are not yet reflected in the genetic makeup of the population. There is some evidence of gene flow between dugongs in Australia and Eastern Indonesia.
To date, there has been little effective management intervention to reduce anthropogenic impacts on the dugong, apart from legislative protection which is almost ubiquitous throughout its range. Management plans have been developed for some 22-24% of the range (mainly in Australia) but are in place in only 18-22% of the range. The dugong is protected by marine protected areas in 22-23% of its range (again mostly in Australia) (see table 1.3).
Because of the uncertainty associated with the assessment of the status of the dugong both on the Queensland coast based on the CPUE data (Marsh et al. 2005) and the rest of its range, we suggest that the classification should remain as Vulnerable A2bcd.
| For further information about this species, see 6909.pdf (626 KB). A PDF viewer such as Adobe Acrobat Reader is required. |
|
|
|
History:
|
| 1965 | - | "Status inadequately known-survey required or data sought" (Scott 1965) |
| 1982 | - | Vulnerable (Thornback and Jenkins 1982) |
| 1986 | - | Vulnerable (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986) |
| 1988 | - | Vulnerable (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988) |
| 1990 | - | Vulnerable (IUCN 1990) |
| 1994 | - | Vulnerable (Groombridge 1994) |
| 1996 | - | Vulnerable (Baillie and Groombridge 1996) |
|
Geographic Range
|
Range Description:
|
Coastal and Island waters between East Africa and Vanuatu between latitudes of about 27° North and South of Equator. See Marsh et al. 2002.
|
|
Countries:
|
Native:
Australia; Bahrain; Brunei Darussalam; Cambodia; China; Comoros; Djibouti; Egypt; Eritrea; India (Andaman Is., Laccadive Is., Nicobar Is.); Indonesia; Japan (Nansei-shoto); Jordan; Kenya; Madagascar; Malaysia; Mayotte; Mozambique; New Caledonia; Palau; Papua New Guinea (Bismarck Archipelago); Philippines; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Singapore; Solomon Islands; Somalia; Sri Lanka; Sudan; Tanzania, United Republic of; Thailand; Timor-Leste; United Arab Emirates; Vanuatu; Viet Nam; Yemen (Socotra) Vagrant:
Iran, Islamic Republic of; Iraq; Israel; Kuwait; Oman; Seychelles Regionally extinct:
Mauritius (Rodrigues - native); Taiwan, Province of China Regionally extinct (uncertain origin):
Maldives Uncertain presence and origin:
Bangladesh; Myanmar
|
|
FAO Marine Fishing Areas:
|
Native:
Indian Ocean-eastern; Indian Ocean-western; Pacific-northwest; Pacific-western central
|
Population
Habitat and Ecology
|
Habitat and Ecology:
|
See See Marsh et al. (2002).
|
|
System:
|
Marine
|
|
List of Habitats:
|
| 9.1 | Marine Neritic - Pelagic |
| 9.8 | Marine Neritic - Coral Reef |
| 9.9 | Marine Neritic - Seagrass (Submerged) |
| 9.10 | Marine Neritic - Estuaries |
|
Threats
|
Threats:
|
See Marsh et al. (2002).
|
|
List of Threats:
|
| 1.4.2 | Habitat Loss/Degradation - Infrastructure development - Human settlement (ongoing) |
| 1.4.5 | Habitat Loss/Degradation - Infrastructure development - Transport (water) (present, future) |
| 3.1.1 | Harvesting (hunting/gathering) - Food - Subsistence use/local trade (ongoing) |
| 3.2.1 | Harvesting (hunting/gathering) - Medicine - Subsistence use/local trade (ongoing) |
| 3.5.1 | Harvesting (hunting/gathering) - Cultural/scientific/leisure activities - Subsistence use/local trade (ongoing) |
| 4.1.1.2 | Accidental mortality - Bycatch - Fisheries-related - Netting (ongoing) |
| 4.1.1.4 | Accidental mortality - Bycatch - Fisheries-related - Dynamite (ongoing) |
| 6.3.1 | Pollution (affecting habitat and/or species) - Water pollution - Agriculture (ongoing) |
| 6.3.6 | Pollution (affecting habitat and/or species) - Water pollution - Oil slicks (ongoing) |
| 7.2 | Natural disasters - Storms/flooding (ongoing) |
| 9.7 | Intrinsic factors - Slow growth rates (ongoing) |
| 10.1 | Human disturbance - Recreation/tourism (ongoing) |
|
Conservation Actions
|
Conservation Actions:
|
The species is listed on CITES Appendix I.
|
|
List of Conservation Actions:
|
| 1.1.1 | Policy-based actions - Management plans - Development (in place, needed) |
| 1.1.2 | Policy-based actions - Management plans - Implementation (in place, needed) |
| 1.2.2.1 | Policy-based actions - Legislation - Implementation - International level (in place, needed) |
| 1.2.2.2 | Policy-based actions - Legislation - Implementation - National level (in place, needed) |
| 1.2.2.3 | Policy-based actions - Legislation - Implementation - Sub-national level (in place, needed) |
| 1.3.3 | Policy-based actions - Community management - Livelihood alternatives (in place, needed) |
| 2.1 | Communication and Education - Formal education (in place, needed) |
| 2.2 | Communication and Education - Awareness (in place, needed) |
| 2.3 | Communication and Education - Capacity-building/Training (in place, needed) |
| 3.1 | Research actions - Taxonomy (in place, needed) |
| 3.2 | Research actions - Population numbers and range (in place, needed) |
| 3.3 | Research actions - Biology and Ecology (in place, needed) |
| 3.4 | Research actions - Habitat status (in place, needed) |
| 3.5 | Research actions - Threats (in place, needed) |
| 3.6 | Research actions - Uses and harvest levels (in place, needed) |
| 3.7 | Research actions - Cultural relevance (in place, needed) |
| 3.8 | Research actions - Conservation measures (in place, needed) |
| 3.9 | Research actions - Trends/Monitoring (in place, needed) |
| 4.4.1 | Habitat and site-based actions - Protected areas - Identification of new protected areas (in place, needed) |
| 4.4.2 | Habitat and site-based actions - Protected areas - Establishment (in place, needed) |
| 4.4.3 | Habitat and site-based actions - Protected areas - Management (in place, needed) |
| 4.4.4 | Habitat and site-based actions - Protected areas - Expansion (needed) |
|
Bibliography
|
Bibliography:
|
Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (compilers and editors) 1996. 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Groombridge, B. (ed.) 1994. 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1986. 1986 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1988. 1988 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN. 1990. 1990 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Marsh, H., De'ath, G., Gribble, N. and Lane, B. 2005. Historical marine population estimates: triggers or targets for conservation? The dugong case study. Ecological Applications 15: 481–492. Marsh, H., Penrose, H., Eros, C. and Hugues, J. 2002. Dugong Status Report and Action Plans for Countries and Territories. Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, United Nations Environment Program. UNEP/DEWA/RS.02-1. 162 pp. Scott, P. (ed.) 1965. Section XIII. Preliminary List of Rare Mammals and Birds. In: The Launching of a New Ark, pp. 15–207. First Report of the President and Trustees of the World Wildlife Fund. An International Foundation for saving the world's wildlife and wild places 1961–1964. Collins, London. Thornback, J. and Jenkins, M. 1982. The IUCN Mammal Red Data Book. Part 1: Threatened mammalian taxa of the Americas and the Australasian zoogeographic region (excluding Cetacea). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. UNTAET 2000. Regulation No. 2000/19 on Protected Places. United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor. UNTAET/REG/2000/19. WWF Eastern African Marine Ecoregion 2004. Towards a Western Indian Ocean Dugong Conservation Strategy: The Status of Dugongs in the Western Indian Ocean Region and Priority Conservation Actions. 68 pp. Dar es Salam, Tanazania.
|
|
|