Lycalopex culpaeus 


Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Canidae

Scientific Name: Lycalopex culpaeus
Species Authority: Molina, 1782
Common Name(s):
English Culpeo, Andean Fox
Spanish Lobo Andino, Culpeo, Zorro Andino, Zorro Colorado, Zorro Culpeo
French Culpeau
Pseudalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782)
Taxonomic Source(s): Zunino, G.E., Vaccaro, O.B., Canevari, M. and Gardner, A.L. 1995. Taxonomy of the genus Lycalopex (Carnivora: Canidae) in Argentina. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 108: 729–747.
Taxonomic Notes: Several recent molecular studies have provided support for a monophyletic assemblage of South American endemic canids (Lindblad-Toh et al. 2005, Perini et al. 2010), withChrysocyon and Speothos forming a sister-clade to the monophyletic South American foxes and Atelocynus. On the basis of morphology, Zunino et al. (1995) reviewed previous work and also supported clustering species within the two previous paraphyletic genera (PseudalopexLycalopex) into a single monophyletic genus. They further argued that Lycalopex had priority over Pseudalopex, subsequently also supported by Zrzavý et al. (2004: 324). The only outstanding question would have been whether Dusicyon would have been a more appropriate name, since Perini et al. (2010) reported a close relationship between L. culpaeus and Dusicyon. However, we now know that Dusicyon is far outside this clade (Slater et al. 2009, Austin et al. 2013). Based on this evidence, the genus Lycalopex is used over Pseudalopex for all South American foxes, following Wozencraft's (2005) earlier treatment.

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: 2016-03-04
Assessor(s): Lucherini, M.
Reviewer(s): Hoffmann, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.
Contributor(s): Jiménez, J., Novaro, A. & Ramirez-Chaves, H.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Hoffmann, M. & Thresher, S.
The Culpeo is distributed from the Andes and hilly regions of South America, ranging down to the Pacific shoreline in the desert of northern Chile and Argentine Patagonia. Culpeos appear to withstand intense hunting levels and still maintain viable regional populations. When hunting pressure is reduced, populations usually can recover quickly. However, it appears that the combined effects of hunting and interspecific competition/predation with Pumas (Puma concolor) are producing a marked reduction in population numbers in some parts of the range in southern Argentina. At present, there is no reason to believe the species is declining at a rate sufficient to warrant listing in a threatened category and is listed as Least Concern.
Previously published Red List assessments:
  • 2008 – Least Concern (LC)
  • 2004 – Least Concern (LC)
  • 1996 – Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:The Culpeo is distributed along the Andes and hilly regions of South America from Nariño and Putumayo Departments of south-west Colombia in the north (Jiménez et al. 1995, Ramírez-Chaves et al. 2013; records from departments further north are dubious) to Tierra del Fuego in the south (Markham 1971, Redford and Eisenberg 1992). It ranges down to the Pacific shoreline in the desert of northern Chile (Mann 1945, Jiménez and Novaro 2004), south to about Valdivia (Osgood 1943) and then again in Magallanes. On the eastern slopes of the Andes, the Culpeo is found in Argentina from Jujuy Province in the North, reaching the Atlantic shoreline from Río Negro and southwards. This extended eastward distribution is relatively recent and was apparently favoured by sheep ranching, increased availability of exotic prey and extirpation of Puma (Crespo and De Carlo 1963, Novaro 1997a, Novaro and Walker 2005). However, in the last 10-15 years the shrinking of sheep production in Argentine Patagonia has facilitated Puma recolonization. The probable increase in predation or competitive exclusion by Pumas in turn appears to have caused declines in Culpeo populations (Travaini et al. 2007, A. Travaini pers. comm. 2015).
Countries occurrence:
Argentina; Bolivia, Plurinational States of; Chile; Colombia; Ecuador; Peru
Additional data:
Upper elevation limit (metres):4800
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:Due to conflicts with humans (i.e., preying upon poultry and livestock, Crespo and De Carlo 1963, Bellati and von Thüngen 1990, Lucherini and Merino 2008) and because of its value as a furbearer, the Culpeo has been persecuted throughout its range for many decades (Jiménez 1993, Novaro 1995). Thus, current population numbers may be the result of past and present hunting pressure and food availability. The introduction of exotic prey species such as European Hares (Lepus europaeus) and rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), as well as small-sized livestock into Chile and Argentina ca. 100 years ago, probably led to increases in the distribution and abundance of Culpeos, and facilitated their expansion towards the lowlands in eastern Argentina (Crespo and De Carlo 1963, Crespo 1975, Jiménez 1993, Jaksic 1998, Novaro et al. 2000a). The recent observation that the comeback of Pumas in Patagonia may be affecting negatively its abundance suggests that a reduction of intraguild competition/predation had also favoured this expansion in range. Currently, Culpeos range over a much wider area in Patagonia than previously. Likewise, in several areas of the desert of northern Chile, recent mining activities provide the Culpeo with resources such as food, water and shelter that were in much shorter supply in the past, and hence have changed their local distribution and abundance (Jiménez and Novaro 2004).

Culpeos appear to withstand intense hunting levels as shown by fur harvest data from Argentina and still maintain viable regional populations (Novaro 1995). However, this may only be possible through immigration from neighbouring unexploited areas that act as refugia (Novaro 1995). The Culpeo population in Neuquén Province in north-west Patagonia for example, appears to function as a source-sink system in areas where cattle and sheep ranches are intermixed (Novaro 1997b, Novaro et al. 2005). Cattle ranches where no hunting occurs supply disperser foxes that repopulate sheep ranches with intense hunting. Changes in sex ratio may be another mechanism that allows Culpeo populations to withstand intense hunting (Novaro 1995). Furthermore, large litter size and early maturity (Crespo and De Carlo 1963) could explain the Culpeo's high resilience to hunting.

When hunting pressure is reduced, Culpeo populations usually can recover quickly (Crespo and De Carlo 1963). This increase was observed at the Chinchilla National Reserve (Jiménez 1993) and at Fray Jorge National Park (Meserve et al. 1987, Salvatori et al. 1999), both in north-central Chile. Culpeo densities also have increased in many areas of Argentine Patagonia following the reduction of fur prices and hunting pressure in the late 1980s and early 1990s (Novaro 1997b, Novaro and Walker 2005). An exception to this response is the Culpeo population in Tierra del Fuego, where its populations are still declining in spite of several years of reduced hunting pressure (N. Loekemeyer and A. Iriarte, in Jiménez and Novaro 2004).

Estimates from intensive trapping by Crespo and De Carlo (1963) provided a density of 0.7 individuals/km² for north-west Patagonia, Argentina. Thirty years later, Novaro et al. (2000b), using line transects, reported densities of 0.2–1.3 individuals/km² for the same area. In north-central Chile, the ecological density of culpeos in ravines was 2.6 individuals/km², whereas the crude density (throughout the study site) was 0.3 individuals/km² (Jiménez 1993). In Torres del Paine, a crude density of 1.3 individuals/km² was reported based on sightings (J. Rau, in Jiménez and Novaro 2004). Interestingly, a later estimate for the same area, based on telemetry, rendered an ecological density of 1.2 individuals/km² (Johnson 1992, in Jiménez 1993).

Based on radio telemetry, sightings and abundance of faeces, Salvatori et al. (1999) concluded that Culpeos respond numerically to a decline in the availability of their prey in north-central Chile. Earlier, based on abundance of faeces, Jaksic et al. (1993) reached the same conclusion for the same Culpeo population. In contrast, Culpeos (not distinguished from sympatric Chillas) did not show a numerical or a functional response during a decline of their main prey at another site in north-central Chile (Jaksic et al. 1992).
Current Population Trend:Stable
Additional data:
Population severely fragmented:No

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:Throughout its wide distribution, the Culpeo uses many habitat types ranging from rugged and mountain terrain, deep valleys and open deserts, scrubby pampas, sclerophyllous matorral, to broad-leaved temperate southern beech forest in the south. The Culpeo uses all the range of habitat moisture gradients from the driest desert to the broad-leaved rainforest. In the Andes of Peru, Chile, Bolivia and Argentina, the Culpeo reaches elevations of up to 4,800 m (Redford and Eisenberg 1992, Romo 1995, Jiménez and Novaro 2004, Tellaeche et al. 2014). Redford and Eisenberg (1992) placed the Culpeo in the coldest and driest environments of South America relative to other South American canids.
Generation Length (years):3-4

Use and Trade [top]

Use and Trade: Until the early 1990s, the main cause of mortality was hunting and trapping for fur (Miller and Rottmann 1976, Novaro 1995). During 1986, in excess of 2,100 fox skins (Culpeo and Chilla) were exported from Chile (Iriarte et al. 1997). An average of 4,600 Culpeo pelts were exported annually from Argentina between 1976 and 1982, with a peak of 8,524 in 1977. Legal exports declined to an average of approximately 1,000 between 1983 and 1996 with peaks of 2,421 in 1990 and 4,745 in 1996 and have been negligible since 1997 (Novaro 1995, Jiménez and Novaro 2004).

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Main threats to Culpeos have been hunting and trapping for fur (although trade has decreased in the last decade) and persecution to reduce predation on livestock and poultry (Travaini et al. 2000, Lucherini and Merino 2008). Although illegal, the use of poison to reduce or prevent livestock losses caused by Culpeos is still widespread in some parts of its range, including remote areas of the high Andes (García Brea et al. 2010, M. Lucherini pers. comm. 2015.). Habitat loss does not appear to be an important threat to this species. Predation by feral and domestic dogs may be important in some areas (Novaro 1997b).

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Legislation
Included on CITES – Appendix II.

The Argentine legislation about Culpeos is contradictory. Culpeos were considered "Endangered" by a 1983 decree of the Argentine Wildlife Board (Dirección de Fauna y Flora Silvestres), due to the numbers of Culpeo pelts traded during the 1970s and early 1980s. However, trade at the national level and export of Culpeo pelts was legal during that entire period and currently remains legal. Culpeos are legally hunted in 6 Argentine provinces and a bounty system is in place in two of them. The Culpeo's endangered status has never been revised in spite of marked changes in the fur trade and reports from monitoring programmes. However, it has been listed as Near Threatened in the most recent national Red List (Lucherini and Zapata 2012). The Tierra del Fuego population has been legally protected since 1985. 

In Peru, the Culpeo is not considered endangered, but permits are issued by the government to hunt individuals depredating on livestock (D. Cossios pers. comm. 2015). Similarly, in Chile, where the species is listed as Least Concern, the Hunting of Culpeos is illegal (since 1980), but permits may be obtained for predator control (A. Iriarte and J. Jimenez, pers. comm. 2015). In Bolivia, although the fur export was banned in 1986 and hunting is illegal, Culpeos are commonly killed to reduce predation on livestock (Tarifa 1996, L. Pacheco pers. comm. 2015).

The Argentine Wildlife Board is starting to develop a management plan for canids that will include the Culpeo. Five regional workshops that included wildlife agency officials from provincial governments, wildlife traders, conservationists, and scientists have been held in Argentine Patagonia to coordinate efforts to manage Culpeo populations in a sustainable manner and reduce sheep predation (Funes et al. 2006). 

Presence in protected areas
In Chile, the Culpeo occurs in the large majority of protected areas distributed throughout the country, encompassing all the habitats where it can be found. However, only 14% are large enough to support viable populations. In Argentina, the species occurs in 12 national parks and several provincial reserves, the majority of which probably support viable populations. In Peru, Culpeos occur in 18 (D. Cossios pers. comm. 2015) and in Bolivia in nine (Wallace et al. 2010, L. Pacheco pers. comm. 2015) of each country's national system of protected areas. 

Presence in captivity
The Culpeo is common in zoos throughout Chile and Argentina.

Classifications [top]

1. Forest -> 1.4. Forest - Temperate
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
1. Forest -> 1.5. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
1. Forest -> 1.9. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
suitability: Suitable  major importance:No
2. Savanna -> 2.2. Savanna - Moist
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
3. Shrubland -> 3.4. Shrubland - Temperate
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
3. Shrubland -> 3.7. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
3. Shrubland -> 3.8. Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
4. Grassland -> 4.4. Grassland - Temperate
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
4. Grassland -> 4.7. Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
0. Root -> 6. Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
suitability: Suitable  major importance:Yes
14. Artificial/Terrestrial -> 14.2. Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland
suitability: Marginal  
2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management

In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning
  Action Recovery plan:No
  Systematic monitoring scheme:No
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
  Conservation sites identified:No
  Occur in at least one PA:Yes
  Area based regional management plan:No
  Invasive species control or prevention:Not Applicable
In-Place Species Management
  Harvest management plan:Yes
  Successfully reintroduced or introduced beningly:No
  Subject to ex-situ conservation:Yes
In-Place Education
  Subject to recent education and awareness programmes:No
  Included in international legislation:Yes
  Subject to any international management/trade controls:Yes
5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals -> 5.1.1. Intentional use (species is the target)
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals -> 5.1.3. Persecution/control
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive & other problematic species & genes -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species -> 8.1.2. Named species (Canis familiaris)
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: No decline ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

3. Monitoring -> 3.1. Population trends

Bibliography [top]

Austin, J.J., Soubrier, J., Prevosti, F.J., Prates, L., Trejo, V., Mena, F. and Cooper, A. 2013. The origins of the enigmatic Falkland Islands wolf. Nature Communications 4: 1552.

Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (comps and eds). 1996. 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Bellati, J. and von Thüngen, J. 1990. Lamb predation in Patagonian ranches. In: L. R. Davis and R. E. Marsh (eds), Proceedings 14th Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 263-268. University of California, Davis, California, USA.

Cofré, H. and Marquet, P.A. 1999. Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: an assessment. Biological Conservation 88: 53-68.

Crespo, J. A. 1975. Ecology of the pampas grey fox and the large fox (culpeo). In: Fox, M. W. (ed.), The wild canids. Their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution, pp. 179-190. Van Norstrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA.

Crespo, J. A. and De Carlo, J. M. 1963. Estudio ecológico de una población de zorros colorados, Dusicyon culpaeus culpaeus (Molina) en el oeste de la provincia de Neuquén. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia,". Ecología 1: 1-55.

Funes, M., Novaro, A.J., Monsalvo, O.B., Pailacura, O., Sanchez Aldao, G., Pessino, M., Dosio, R., Chehébar, C., Ramilo, E., Bellati, J., Puig, S., Videla, F., Opoto, N., González del Solar, R., Castillo, E., García, E., Loekemeyer, N., Bugnest, F. and Mateazzi, G. 2006. El Manejo de zorros en la Argentina. In: M.L. Bolcovik and D. Ramadori (eds), Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Argentina, pp. 151-166. Programas de uso sustentable, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

García Brea, A., Zapata, S. C., Procopio, D. E., Martínez Peck, R., and Travaini, A. 2010. Evaluación del interés de productores ganaderos en el control selectivo y eficiente de predadores en la Patagonia Austral. Acta zoológica mexicana 26: 303-321.

Glade, A. 1993. Red list of Chilean terrestrial vertebrates. In: A. Glade (ed.), Proceedings of the symposium "Conservation status of Chilean terrestrial vertebrate fauna". Santiago, Chile.

Iriarte, J.A., P. Feinsinger, F. M. Jaksic. 1997. Trends in wildlife use and trade in Chile. Biological Conservation 81: 9-20.

IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: (Accessed: 30 June 2016).

Jaksic, F. M. 1998. Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1427-1445.

Jaksic, F. M., Jimenez, J. E., Castro, S. A. and Feinsinger, P. 1992. Numerical and functional response of predators to a long-term decline in mammalian prey at a semi-arid Neotropical site. Oecologia 89: 90-101.

Jaksic, F. M., Meserve, P. L., Gutiérrez, J. R. and Tabilo, E. L. 1993. The components of predation on small mammals in semi-arid Chile: preliminary results. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 66: 305-321.

Jiménez, J. E. 1993. Comparative ecology of Dusicyon foxes at the Chinchilla National Reserve in northcentral Chile. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Florida.

Jiménez, J.E. and Novaro, J.E. 2004. Culpeo Pseudalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782). In: Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M. & Macdonald, D.W. (ed.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, pp. 44-49. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Jimenez, J. E., Yanez, J. L., Tabilo, E. L. and Jaksic, F. M. 1995. Body size of Chilean foxes: A new pattern in light of new data. Acta Theriologica 40: 321-326.

Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C.M., Mikkelsen, T.S., Karlsson, E.K., Jaffe, D.B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J.L., Kulbokas, E.J., Zody, M.C., Mauceli, E., Xie, X., Breen, M., Wayne, R.K., Ostrander, E.A., Ponting, C.P., Galibert, F., Smith, D.R., deJong, P.J., Kirkness, E., Alvarez, P., Biagi, T., Brockman, W., Butler, J., Chin, C.W., Cook, A., Cuff, J., Daly, M.J., DeCaprio, D., Gnerre, S., Grabherr, M., Kellis, M., Kleber, M., Bardeleben, C., Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., Hitte, C., Kim, L., Koepfli, K.P., Parker, H.G., Pollinger, J.P., Searle, S.M.J., Sutter, N.B., Thomas, R., Webber, C. and Lander, E.S. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438(7069): 803-819.

Lucherini, M. and Merino, M.J. 2008. Perceptions of Human-Carnivore Conflicts in the High Andes of Argentina. Mountain Research and Development 28(1): 81-85.

Lucherini, M., and Zapata, S. 2008. Human-carnivore conflicts in the high-altitude Andes of Argentina. Mountain Research and Development 28: 81-85.

Lucherini, M., and Zapata, S. 2012. Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina). In: Ojeda R.A., Chillo V. y Diaz Isenrath G.B. (ed.), Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Amenazados de la Argentina, pp. 89. S.A.R.E.M., Mendoza, Argentina.

Mann, F. G. 1945. Mamíferos de Tarapaca: observaciones realizadas durante una expedición al alto norte de Chile. Biológica (Chile) 2: 23–141.

Markham, B. J. 1971. Presencia del "culpeo" (Dusicyon culpaeus) en la Isla Hoste, Tierra del Fuego. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 2: 164-165.

Meserve, P. L., Shadrick, E. J. and Kelt, D. A. 1987. Diets and selectivity of two Chilean predators in the northern semi-arid zone. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 60: 93-99.

Miller, S. and Rottmann, J. 1976. Guia para el reconocimiento de mamiferos chilenos. Editora Nacional Gabriela Mistral, Santiago.

Novaro, A. J. 1995. Sustainability of harvest of culpeo fox in Patagonia. Oryx 29: 18-22.

Novaro, A. J. 1997. Pseudalopex culpaeus. Mammalian Species 558: 1-8.

Novaro, A. J. 1997. Source-sink dynamics induced by hunting: case study of culpeo foxes on rangelands in Patagonia, Argentina. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida.

Novaro, A.J. and Walker, R.S. 2005. Human-induced changes in the effect of top carnivores on biodiversity in Patagonia. In: Ray, J.C., Berger, J., Redford, K.H. and Steneck, R. (eds), Large Carnivores and the Conservation of Biodiversity: Does Conserving One Save the Other? , pp. 267–288. Island Press, Washington, USA.

Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C. and Walker, R. S. 2000. Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Patagonia. Biological Conservation 92: 25-33.

Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., and Walker, R. S. 2005. An empirical test of source–sink dynamics induced by hunting. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 910-920.

Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., Rambeaud, C. and Monsalvo, O. 2000. Calibración del índice de estaciones odoríferas para estimar tendencias poblacionales del zorro colorado (Pseudalopex culpaeus) en Patagonia. Mastozoología Neotropical 7: 81-88.

Osgood, W.H. 1943. The mammals of Chile. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series 30: 1-268.

Perini, F.A., Russo, C.A.M. and Schrago, C.G. 2010. The evolution of South American endemic canids: a history of rapid diversification and morphological parallelism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 311-322.

Ramírez-Chaves, H.E., Chaves-Salazar, J.M. & Mendoza-Escobar, R.H. 2013. Nuevo registro del Lobo de Páramo Lycalopex culpaeus (Mammalia: Canidae) en el Suroccidente de Colombia con notas sobre su distribución en el país. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 29: 412-422.

Redford, K.H. and Eisenberg, J.F. 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics, The Southern Cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.

Romo, M. C. 1995. Food habits of the Andean fox (Pseudalopex culpaeus) and notes on the mountain cat (Felis colocolo) and puma (Felis concolor) in the Río Abiseo National Park, Perú. Mammalia 59: 335.

Salvatori, V., Vaglio, G. L., Boitani, L., Campanella, A. and Meserve, P. A. 1999. Spatial organization, activity, and social interactions of culpeo foxes (Pseudalopex culpaeus) in north-central Chile. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 980-985.

Slater, G.J., Thalmann, O., Leonard, J., Schweizer, R.M., Koepfli, K-P., Pollinger, J.P., Rawlence, N.J., Austin, J.J., Cooper, A. and Wayne, R.K. 2009. Evolutionary history of the Falklands wolf. Current Biology 19: 937–938.

Tarifa, T. 1996. Mamiferos. In: P. Ergueta and C. de Morales (eds), Libro rojo de los vertebrados de Bolivia, pp. 165-262. Centro de Datos para la conservacion-Bolivia, La Paz, Bolivia.

Tellaeche, C.G., Reppucci, J. I., Luengos Vidal, E. M. & Lucherini, M. 2014. New data on the distribution and natural history of the lesser grison (Galictis cuja), hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga), and culpeo (Lycalopex culpaeus) in northwestern Argentina. Mammalia 78.2: 261-266.

Travaini, A., Rodríguez, A., Zanón, J., Zapata, S.C., Martínez Peck, R. and Procopio, D. 2007. Tendencias poblacionales de zorros colorados y grises (Pseudalopex culpaeus y P. griseus) en la Patagonia austral. XXI Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoología. Tafí del Valle, Argentina.

Travaini, A., Zapata, S. C., Martínez-Peck, R. & Delibes, M. 2000. Percepción y actitud humanas hacia la predación de ganado ovino por el zorro colorado (Pseudalopex culpaeus) en Santa Cruz, Patagonia Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 7: 117-129.

Wallace, R.B., Alfaro, F., Sainz, L., Ríos Uzeda, B. and Noss, A. 2010. Canidae. In: Wallace, R.B., H. Gómez, Z.R. Porcel and D.L. Rumiz (eds), Distribución, ecología y conservación de los mamíferos medianos y grandes de Bolivia, pp. 369-400. Centro de Ecología Difusión Fundación Simón I. Patiño, Santa Cruz De La Sierra, Bolivia.

Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition, pp. 532-628. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Zrzavý, J. and Řičánkova, V. 2004. Phylogeny of recent Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora): relative reliability and utility of morphological and molecular datasets. Zoologica Scripta 33: 311-333.

Zunino, G.E., Vaccaro, O.B., Canevari, M. and Gardner, A.L. 1995. Taxonomy of the genus Lycalopex (Carnivora: Canidae) in Argentina. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 108: 729–747.

Citation: Lucherini, M. 2016. Lycalopex culpaeus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T6929A85324366. . Downloaded on 30 June 2016.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided