|Scientific Name:||Acanthobrama telavivensis|
|Species Authority:||Goren, Fishelson & Trewavas, 1973|
|Taxonomic Source(s):||Eschmeyer, W.N. (ed.). 2014. Catalog of Fishes. Updated 10 March 2014. Available at: http:// research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalogfishcatmain.asp.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Vulnerable D2 ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Freyhof, J. & Smith, K.|
Sixty years ago, this species was very abundant in most coastal streams in Israel. There was a sharp decline between 1950 and 1970. Then the population was stable until 1999, however, drought (in 1999) resulted in the riverine habitat disappearing and the population declined almost to extinction. The last remaining individuals were taken from the remnants of the river and bred in captivity. In 2006 the fish was reintroduced to 12 rehabilitated natural sites and artificial ponds within its previous natural range. During the period 2007 to 2013, most of these stocked habitats, monitored by the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, revealed large populations of assorted sizes and ages. Many of the juveniles found in 2012/2013 are thus fifth-generation offspring. The species still requires some continued conservation management, such as maintaining sufficient hard substrate for spawning and shelter for the juveniles, however these measures are not thought to be a ‘direct intervention’ and it is expected that the species would still be viable without this management (therefore the species is deemed to be 'wild' and can be assessed against a threatened category).
|Previously published Red List assessments:||
|Range Description:||The species was found in most coastal streams of Israel where, in 1999, it became extirpated from the wild due to drought. It is currently found in 12 rehabilitated natural sites (in seven separate catchments) and artificial ponds in the Yarqon (or Yarkon) and Tut systems, where it was introduced in 2006.|
|Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - km2:||9-13|
|Number of Locations:||7|
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
Fifty years ago, the species was very abundant. There was a sharp decline between 1950 and 1970. Then the population was stable until 1999. In 1999 the population declined almost to extinction due to drought. A captive population was bred from individuals (ca. 150 individuals) taken from two sites (Yarqon River and Tut stream); a few days later these streams dried up completely. Within five years, the captive population was 14,000.
|Current Population Trend:||Increasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||This is a coastal river species, now only existing in 10-12 rehabilitated natural habitats (including ponds), most of them artificial and semi natural.|
|Movement patterns:||Not a Migrant|
|Major Threat(s):||Drought caused by extraction of ground water and changing climate (reduced rainfall) was the primary threat to the species (the reason it became extirpated from its natural habitat). Currently pollution from agriculture and domestic sources and impacts due to long terms wars are the only real potential threat to the species.|
A captive population is held in an artificial situation (laboratory) based on stock taken from two rivers (M. Goren pers. comm). Following this success of experimental reintroduction of the fish and the Government’s assurance regarding water, 12 sites along the Israeli coastal system were assigned for re-introduction of the fish, most of them engineered. During 2006-2007 approximately 9,000, laboratory-born fish were returned to nature. Offspring of the Yarqon River captured fish were stocked in southern Israel, in or close to the Yarqon River basin, while offspring of the Tut Stream were stocked in various rivers in the central and northern coastal system, in basins where this species had existed in the 1950s. In surveys carried out in 2007-2013, fish of all sizes, include juveniles, were found at most sites. The species still requires some continued conservation management, such as maintaining sufficient hard substrate for spawning and shelter for the juveniles, however these measures are not thought to be a ‘direct intervention’ and it is expected that the species would still be viable without this management.
|Citation:||Goren, M. 2014. Acanthobrama telavivensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T61249A19009597. . Downloaded on 25 May 2016.|