Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Canidae

Scientific Name: Vulpes lagopus
Species Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
Regional Assessments:
Common Name(s):
English Arctic Fox, Polar Fox
French Renard Polaire, Isatis, Reynard Polaire
Spanish Zorro Ártico
Alopex lagopus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Notes: Often included in the genus Alopex, current evidence suggests that inclusion in Vulpes (sensu Wozencraft 2005) is warranted as Vulpes is otherwise paraphyletic with respect to Alopex. Nuclear and matrilineal (mitochondrial) DNA unambiguously support the inclusion of Alopex lagopus in Vulpes (Geffen et al. 1992, Lindblad-Toh et al. 2005, Perini et al. 2010).

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver 3.1
Year Published: 2014
Date Assessed: 2014-06-20
Assessor(s): Angerbjörn, A. & Tannerfeldt, M.
Reviewer(s): Hoffmann, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.
Contributor(s): Hersteinsson, P.
The Arctic Fox has a circumpolar distribution in all Arctic tundra habitats, with a global population in the order of several hundred thousand animals. Most populations fluctuate widely in numbers between years in response to varying lemming numbers, but in most areas population status is believed to be good and there is no reason to believe that the species currently qualifies for listing as threatened under any of the criteria.
Previously published Red List assessments:
2008 Least Concern (LC)
2004 Least Concern (LC)
1996 Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:The Arctic Fox has a circumpolar distribution in all Arctic tundra habitats. It breeds north of and above the tree line on the Arctic tundra in North America and Eurasia and on the alpine tundra in Fennoscandia, ranging from northern Greenland at 88°N to the southern tip of Hudson Bay, Canada, 53°N. The southern edge of the species' distribution range may have moved somewhat north during the 20th century resulting in a smaller total range (Hersteinsson and Macdonald 1992). The species inhabits most Arctic islands and many islands in the Bering Sea. The Arctic Fox was also introduced to previously isolated islands in the Aleutian chain at the end of the 19th century by the fur industry (Bailey 1992), where they are now often being eliminated by bird conservation efforts (Walton et al. 2013). The Arctic Fox has also been observed on the sea ice up to the North Pole. They may occur up to 3,000 m asl in elevation. 

During the last glaciation, the Arctic Fox had a distribution along the ice edge, and Arctic Fox remains have been found in a number of Pleistocene deposits over most of Europe and large parts of Siberia (Dalén et al. 2007).
Countries occurrence:
Canada; Finland; Greenland; Iceland; Norway; Russian Federation; Svalbard and Jan Mayen; Sweden; United States (Alaska, Aleutian Is. - Introduced)
FAO Marine Fishing Areas:
Arctic Sea; Atlantic – northeast
Upper elevation limit (metres):3000
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:The world population of Arctic Foxes is in the order of several hundred thousand animals. Most populations fluctuate widely in numbers between years in response to varying lemming numbers. In most areas, however, population status is believed to be good. The species is common in the tundra areas of Russia, Canada, coastal Alaska, Greenland and Iceland. Exceptions are Fennoscandia, islands in the Bering Sea (Mednyi Island, Russia; Pribilof Islands, Alaska, e.g., St Paul), where populations are at critically low levels and appear to be declining further. On some Aleutian Islands, Alaska, non-native Arctic Foxes are being eradicated in the course of bird conservation efforts (Walton et al. 2013). Vagrant Arctic Foxes are common over the northern sea-ice where can move several thousands of kilometres following Polar Bears Ursus maritimus as scavengers (Tarroux et al. 2010).
Current Population Trend:Stable
Additional data:
Population severely fragmented:No

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:Inhabits Arctic and alpine tundra on the continents of Eurasia, North America and the Canadian archipelago, Siberian islands, Greenland, inland Iceland and Svalbard, and Sub-Arctic maritime habitat in the Aleutian island chain, Bering Sea Islands, Commander Islands and coastal Iceland.

The Arctic Fox is an opportunistic predator and scavenger but in most inland areas, the species is heavily dependent on fluctuating rodent populations. The species' main prey items include lemmings, both Lemmus spp. and Dicrostonyx spp. (Macpherson 1969, Angerbjörn et al. 1999). In Fennoscandia, Lemmus lemmus was the main prey in summer (85% frequency of occurrence in faeces) followed by birds (Passeriformes, Galliformes and Caridriiformes, 34%) and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) (21%; Elmhagen et al. 2000). In winter, ptarmigan and grouse (Lagopus spp.) are common prey in addition to rodents and reindeer (Kaikusalo and Angerbjörn 1995). Changes in fox populations have been observed to follow those of their main prey in three- to five-year cycles (Macpherson 1969, Angerbjörn et al. 1999, 2013) with up to 20 cubs produced by a single female (Tannerfeldt and Angerbjörn 1998).

Foxes living near ice-free coasts have access to both inland prey and sea birds, seal carcasses, fish and invertebrates connected to the marine environment, leading to relatively stable food availability and a more generalist strategy (Hersteinsson and Macdonald 1996). In late winter and summer, foxes found in coastal Iceland feed on seabirds (Uria aalge, U. lomvia), seal carcasses and marine invertebrates. Inland foxes rely more on ptarmigan in winter, and migrant birds, such as geese and waders, in summer (Hersteinsson and Macdonald 1996). In certain areas, foxes rely on colonies of Arctic geese, which can dominate their diet locally (Samelius and Lee 1998). Some populations switch between lemmings, migratory birds and marine resources depending on intra- and interannual variations in prey availability. The Arctic Fox depends also on remains of carrion left by larger predators, e.g. Polar Bear, Grey Wolf Canis lupus, and Wolverine Gulo gulo. It is itself a victim of predation, mainly from Red Fox, Wolverine, Golden Eagle, and humans.
Systems:Terrestrial; Marine

Use and Trade [top]

Use and Trade: The Arctic Fox remains the single most important terrestrial game species in the Arctic. Indigenous peoples have always utilized its exceptional fur, and with the advent of the fur industry, the Arctic Fox quickly became an important source of income. Today, leg-hold traps and shooting are the main hunting methods. Because of their large reproductive capacity, Arctic Foxes can maintain population levels under high hunting pressure. In some areas, up to 50% of the total population has been harvested on a sustainable basis (Nasimovic and Isakov 1985). However, this does not allow for hunting during population lows, as shown by the situation in Fennoscandia. The Arctic Fox has nevertheless survived high fur prices better than most other Arctic mammals. Hunting has declined considerably in the last decades, as a result of low fur prices and alternative sources of income. In the Yukon, for example, the total value of all fur production decreased from $1.3 million in 1988 to less than $300,000 after 2000.

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Hunting for fur has long been a major mortality factor for the Arctic Fox. With the decline of the fur hunting industry, the threat of over-exploitation is lowered for most Arctic Fox populations. They may also be subject to direct persecution (as on St. Paul Island). Misinformation as to the origin of Arctic Foxes on the Pribilofs continues to foster negative attitudes and the long-term persistence of this endemic subspecies is in jeopardy. In areas connected to marine ecosystems, Arctic Foxes may also be affected by indirect threats, such as diseases and the effects of persistent organic pollutants (Sonne et al. 2008); indeed, an emerging threat in Fennoscandia is the impact of sarcoptic mange on populations (Mörner 1992). In some areas, gene swamping by farm-bred blue foxes (see Conservation) may threaten native populations (Norén et al. 2009).

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: The species is not included in the CITES Appendices.

In most of its range, the Arctic Fox is not protected. However, the species and its dens have had total legal protection in Sweden since 1928, in mainland Norway since 1930, and in Finland since 1940. In Europe, the Arctic Fox is a priority species under the Actions by the Community relating to the Environment (ACE). It is therefore to be given full protection. On St. Paul Island the declining Arctic Fox population currently has no legal protection (Walton et al. 2013). In Norway (Svalbard), Greenland, Canada, Russia, and Alaska, trapping is limited to licensed trappers operating in a defined trapping season. The enforcement of these laws appears to be uniformly good. In Iceland, bounty hunting takes place over most of the country outside nature reserves.

For occurrence in protected areas, good information is available only for Sweden and Finland. For Iceland, Arctic Foxes could potentially appear in most protected areas.

An action plan has been developed for Arctic Foxes in Sweden (Elmhagen 2008) and status reports have been published for Norway (Ulvund et al. 2013) and Finland (Kaikusalo et al. 2000). In Sweden, Norway and Finland, a conservation project led to significant increases in the population (Angerbjörn et al. 2013). 

The Arctic Fox occurs widely in captivity on fur farms and has been bred for fur production for over 70 years. The present captive population originates from a number of wild populations and has been bred for characteristics different from those found in the wild, including large size. Escaped "blue" foxes may already be a problem in Fennoscandia (and to a lesser extent in Iceland) due to gene swamping (Norén et al. 2009). In Norway, foxes bred in captivity have successfully been released into the wild (Landa et al. 2014).

The following gaps still exist in knowledge of the Arctic Fox:

1) Little is known concerning the impact of diseases on fox populations, e.g. sarcoptic mange and Echinococcus multilocularis. Allied to this is our lack of knowledge of the epidemiology of Arctic rabies.

2) Considering the northward spread of the Red Fox in certain areas, studies are necessary to determine the effects of competition between Red Foxes and Arctic Foxes on various population parameters and Arctic Fox life-history patterns.

3) The non-recovery of the Fennoscandian population is a cause for concern, and requires specific attention, especially in terms of disease and genetics.

Classifications [top]

4. Grassland -> 4.1. Grassland - Tundra
suitability: Suitable  
2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management

In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning
  Action Recovery plan:Yes
  Systematic monitoring scheme:Yes
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
  Conservation sites identified:Yes, over entire range
  Occur in at least one PA:Yes
  Invasive species control or prevention:Not Applicable
In-Place Species Management
  Harvest management plan:Yes
  Successfully reintroduced or introduced beningly:Yes
  Subject to ex-situ conservation:Yes
In-Place Education
  Subject to recent education and awareness programmes:No
  Included in international legislation:No
  Subject to any international management/trade controls:No
5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals -> 5.1.1. Intentional use (species is the target)
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals -> 5.1.3. Persecution/control
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive & other problematic species & genes -> 8.2. Problematic native species
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

9. Pollution -> 9.3. Agricultural & forestry effluents -> 9.3.3. Herbicides and pesticides
♦ timing: Ongoing ♦ scope: Minority (<50%) ♦ severity: Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score: Low Impact: 4 

1. Research -> 1.3. Life history & ecology
1. Research -> 1.5. Threats

♦  Wearing apparel, accessories
 Local : ✓   National : ✓ 

♦  Sport hunting/specimen collecting
 National : ✓ 

Bibliography [top]

Angerbjörn, A., Eide, N., Dalén, L., Elmhagen, B., Hellström, P., Ims, R., Killengreen, S., Landa, A., Meijer, T., Mela, M., Niemimaa, J., Norén, K., Tannerfeldt, M., Yoccoz, N. and Henttonen, H. 2013. Conservation in practice: replicated management actions on a large spatial scale. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 59–67.

Angerbjörn, A., Tannerfeldt, M. and Erlinge, S. 1999. Predator-prey relations: lemmings and Arctic foxes. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 34-49.

Bailey, E.P. 1992. Red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, as biological control agents for introduced Arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, on Alaskan Islands. Canadian Field-Naturalist 106: 200-205.

Cameron, C., Berteaux, D. & Dufresne, F. 2011. Spatial variation in food availability predicts extrapair paternity in the arctic fox. Behavioral Ecology 22: 1364-1373.

Chesemore, D. L. 1975. Ecology of the Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) in North America - a review. In: M. W. Fox (ed.), The wild canids. Their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution, pp. 143-163. Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., New York, USA.

Cypher, B.L. 2003. Foxes. In: G. A. Feldhamer, B.C. Thompson and J.A. Chapman (eds), Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation, pp. 511-546. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

Dalén, L., Nyström, V., Valdiosera, C., Germonpré, M., Sablin, M., Turner, E., Angerbjörn, A., Arsuaga, J.L. and Götherström, A. 2007. Ancient DNA reveals lack of postglacial habitat tracking in the arctic fox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 6726-6729.

Dragoo, J.W., Choate, J.R., Yates, T.L. and O'Farrell, T.P. 1990. Evolutionary and taxonomic relationships among North American arid-land foxes. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 318-332.

Elmhagen. B. 2008. Åtgärdsprogram för fjällräv, 2008–2012 (Vulpes lagopus). Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.

Elmhagen, B., Hersteinsson, P. , Norén, K., Unnsteinsdottir, E.R. & Angerbjörn, A. 2014. From breeding pairs to fox towns: The social organisation of arctic fox populations with stable and fluctuating availability of food. Polar Biology 37: 111-122.

Elmhagen, B., Tannerfeldt, M., Verucci, P. and Angerbjörn, A. 2000. The Arctic fox – an opportunistic specialist. Journal of Zoology (London) 251: 139-149.

Geffen, E., Mercure, A., Girman, D.J., Macdonald, D.W. and Wayne, R.K. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the fox-like canids: mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment, site and cytochrome b sequence analyses. . Journal of Zoology 228: 27-39.

Hersteinsson, P. and Macdonald, D. W. 1992. Interspecific competition and the geographical distribution of red and Arctic foxes Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus. Oikos 64: 505-515.

Hersteinsson, P. and Macdonald, D.W. 1996. Diet of Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in Iceland. Journal of Zoology (London) 240: 457-474.

Hersteinsson, P., Angerbjörn, A., Frafjord, K. and Kaikusalo, A. 1989. The arctic fox in Fennoscandia and Iceland: management problems. Biological Conservation 49: 67-81.

IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. Available at: (Accessed: 24 July 2014).

Kaikusalo, A. and Angerbjörn, A. 1995. The Arctic fox population in Finnish Lapland during 30 years, 1964-93. Annales Zoologica Fennici 32: 69-77.

Kaikusalo, A., Mela, M. and Henttonen, H. 2000. Häviääkö naali Suomesta? Will the arctic fox become extinct in Finland? Suomen Riista 46: 57-65.

Landa, A., Ulvund, K. Eide, N.E., Flagstad, O., Meås. R. Andersen, R. and Thierry, A.M. 2014. Avlsprogrammet for fjellrev. Årsrapport 2013. . Norsk institutt for naturforskning, Trondheim.

Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C.M., Mikkelsen, T.S., Karlsson, E.K., Jaffe, D.B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J.L., Kulbokas, E.J., Zody, M.C., Mauceli, E., Xie, X., Breen, M., Wayne, R.K., Ostrander, E.A., Ponting, C.P., Galibert, F., Smith, D.R., deJong, P.J., Kirkness, E., Alvarez, P., Biagi, T., Brockman, W., Butler, J., Chin, C.W., Cook, A., Cuff, J., Daly, M.J., DeCaprio, D., Gnerre, S., Grabherr, M., Kellis, M., Kleber, M., Bardeleben, C., Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., Hitte, C., Kim, L., Koepfli, K.P., Parker, H.G., Pollinger, J.P., Searle, S.M.J., Sutter, N.B., Thomas, R., Webber, C. and Lander, E.S. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438(7069): 803-819.

Macpherson, A.H. 1969. The dynamics of Canadian Arctic fox populations. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series 8: 1-49.

Mercure, A., Ralls, K., Koepfli, K.P. and Wayne, R.K. 1993. Genetic subdivisions among small canids: Mitochondrial DNA differentiation of swift, kit, and arctic foxes. . Evolution 47: 1313-1328.

Mörner, T. 1992. Sarcoptic mange in Swedish wildlife. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz. 11: 1115-1121.

Nasimovich, A. and Isakov, Y. (eds). 1985. Arctic fox, red fox and raccoon dog: distribution of resources, ecology, use and conservation. Janka, Moscow, USSR.

Norén, K., Kvaløy, K., Nyström, V., Landa, A., Dalén, L., Eide, N.E., Østbye, E., Henttonen, H. and Angerbjörn, A. 2009. Farmed arctic foxes on the Fennoscandian mountain tundra: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 12: 434-444.

Perini, F. A., Russo, C. A. M. &Schrago, C. G. 2010. The evolution of South American endemic canids: a history of rapid diversification and morphological parallelism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23(2): 311-322.

Samelius, G. and Lee, M. 1998. Arctic fox, Alopex lagopus, predation on lesser snow geese, Chen caerulescens, and their eggs. Canadian Field Naturalist 112: 700-701.

Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M. and Macdonald, D.W. (eds). 2004. Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Sonne, C.S., Wolkers, H., Leifsson, P.S., Jenssen, B.M., Fuglei, E., Ahlstrom, O., Dietz, R., Kirkegaard, M., Muir, D.C.G. and Jorgensen, E. 2008. Organochlorine-induced histopathology in kidney and liver tissue from Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus). Chemosphere 71: 1214-1224.

Tannerfeldt, M. and Angerbjorn, A. 1998. Fluctuating resources and the evolution of litter size in the arctic fox. Oikos 83: 545-559.

Tarroux, A., Berteaux, D. and Bety, J. 2010. Northern nomads: ability for extensive movements in adult arctic foxes. Polar Biology 33: 1021-1026.

Ulvund, K.R., Flagstad, Ø., Eide, N.E. and Landa, A. 2013. Fjellrev i Norge, Resultater fra det nasjonale overvåkingsprogrammet for fjellrev. Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA), Trondheim.

Walton, K., Gotthardt, T. and Fields, T. 2013. Alaska Species Ranking System Summary Report - Arctic fox. . Alaska Natural Heritage Program, University of Alaska Anchorage.

Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition, pp. 532-628. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.

Citation: Angerbjörn, A. & Tannerfeldt, M. 2014. Vulpes lagopus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T899A57549321. . Downloaded on 04 October 2015.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided