|Scientific Name:||Neurogomphus zambeziensis|
|Species Authority:||Cammaerts, 2004|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Suhling, F. & Clausnitzer, V.|
|Reviewer(s):||Dijkstra, K.-D.B., Clausnitzer, V., Suhling, F., Samways, M., Samraoui, B., Boudot, J.P., Kipping, J. (Odonata Red List Authority) & Allen, D. (IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Unit)|
This is a widespread species with no known major widespread threats that is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a threatened category. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern. In southern Africa, the species has a relatively wide distribution, occurring in river catchments of the Zambezi and Limpopo. Its occurrence outside the southern Africa region (record from Tanzania) has still to be confirmed.
|Range Description:||The species has been recorded from Transvaal to Mozambique, Zambia, and probably Tanzania.
In eastern Africa, it has been recorded in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Malawi and Burundi: unconfirmed record from southern Tanzania.
In southern Africa, this species may be endemic to the southern Africa region. It occurs in the river catchments of the Zambezi and the Limpopo (Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa (Transvaal), Zambia, and Zimbabwe). However, there is also an unconfirmed record from Tanzania. In South Africa, there are only two records: Pafuri, Kruger National Park, and Ndumo, KwaZulu-Natal (Samways 2006).
Native:Botswana; Burundi; Kenya; Malawi; Mozambique; South Africa; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||No information is available on overall population size or trends. It appears to be a localised species throughout its range (Samways 2006).|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Rivers in bush, woodland, savanna. Tall grass and other low vegetation near wide, meandering rivers (Samways 2006).|
|Major Threat(s):||In South Africa, major changes to the river systems of the Kruger National Park as a result of the floods of February 2000 may have altered its habitat, particularly that of the larvae (Samways 2006). No information is available from elsewhere in its range.|
|Conservation Actions:||In South Africa, further searches for the species are required (Samways 2006). No specific conservation measures are known to be in place or are planned at present.|
Cammaerts, R. 2004. Taxonomic studies on African Gomphidae (Odonata, Anisoptera). 2. A revision of the genus Neurogomphus Karsch, with the description of some larvae. Belgian Journal of Entomology 6(1): 1-239.
Dijkstra, K.-D.B. and Clausnitzer, V. 2005. An annotated checklist of the dragonflies (Odonata) of eastern Africa, with critical lists for Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, new records, taxonomic notes and descriptions of new species. in prep.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.3). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 2 September 2010).
Kipping, J. 2006. The Odonata of Botswana - an annotated checklist. Cimbebasia Memoirs 5: In press.
Samways, M.J. 2002. A strategy for national red listing invertebrates based on experiences with Odonata in South Africa. African Entomology 10: 43-52.
Samways, M.J. 2004. Critical species of Odonata in southern Africa. International Journal of Odonatology 7: 255-262.
Samways, M.J. 2006. Honing Red List assessments of lesser known taxa in biodiversity hotspots. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(9): 2575-2586.
Samways, M.J. 2006. National Red List of South African Odonata. Odonatologica 35: 341-368.
Suhling, F., Martens, A., Schmalstieg, K., Schütte, C. and Richter, O. 2006. Biodiversity patterns of freshwaters in an arid country: distribution atlas and updated checklist of the Odonata of Namibia. Cimbebasia Memoirs 5: In press.
|Citation:||Suhling, F. & Clausnitzer, V. 2010. Neurogomphus zambeziensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 30 January 2015.|