|Scientific Name:||Leptodactylus albilabris (Günther, 1859)|
Leptodactylus dominicensis Cochran, 1923
|Taxonomic Notes:||Leptodactylus dominicensis is now considered to be a junior synonym of Leptodactylus albilabris (Hedges and Heinicke, 2007).|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Ariadne Angulo and Simon Stuart|
Listed as Least Concern since, although its Extent of Occurrence is probably less than 20,000 km2, it is common and adaptable with a presumed large population, and it is not known to be in decline at present.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
|Range Description:||This species occurs on Puerto Rico, Isla Vieques, Isla Culebra, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. The altitudinal range is from sea level up to 1,030m asl.|
Native:Dominican Republic; Puerto Rico; Virgin Islands, British; Virgin Islands, U.S.
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||While this species is abundant and widespread in the U.S. Virgin Islands, it appears to be in decline in the British Virgin Islands (Perry and Gerber, 2006).|
|Current Population Trend:||Stable|
|Habitat and Ecology:||It is semi-aquatic, inhabiting streams, marshes, and irrigated fields, as well as drainage ditches and gutters in both forested, open country and urban areas. Males call from ground or aquatic vegetation, eggs are laid in foam nests.|
While this is an adaptable species and is known to occur in brackish waters, a potential threat to species viability in coastal wetlands is comprised by the predicted rise in sea level and salt water intrusion as a consequence of global warming (Rios-López, 2008).
Its tadpoles may be vulnerable to competition from Osteopilus septentrionalis (Perry and Gerber, 2006).
|Conservation Actions:||It occurs in all the protected areas of Puerto Rico. A study of population trends is desirable (Perry and Gerber, 2006).|
Burrowes, P.A., Joglar, R.L. and Green, D.E. 2004. Potential causes for amphibian declines in Puerto Rico. Herpetologica 60(2): 141-154.
Hedges, S.B. 1993. Global amphibian declines: a perspective from the Caribbean. Biodiversity and Conservation 2(3): 290-303.
Hedges, S.B., and Heinicke, M.P. 2007. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of West Indian frogs of the genus Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 308-314.
Henderson, R.W. and Powell, R. 1999. West Indian herpetoecology. In: B.I. Crother (ed.), Caribbean Amphibians and Reptiles, pp. 223-226. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
Henderson, R.W. and Powell, R. 2001. Responses by the West Indian herpetofauna to human-influenced resources. Caribbean Journal of Science 37: 41-54.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.2). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 29 June 2010).
Perry, G.,and Gerber, G.P. 2006. Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in the British Virgin Islands: Status and patterns. Applied Herpetology 3: 237-256.
Rios-López, N. 2008. Effects of increased salinity on tadpoles of two anurans from a Caribbean coastal wetland in relation to their natural abundance. Amphibia-Reptilia 29: 7-18.
Rivero, J.A. 1998. Los Anfibios y Reptiles de Puerto Rico / The Amphibians and Reptiles of Puerto Rico. Second edition. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, San Juan.
|Citation:||Neftalí Ríos-Lopez. 2010. Leptodactylus albilabris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T57113A11581929.Downloaded on 26 April 2018.|