|Scientific Name:||Brugmansia suaveolens (Willd.) Sweet|
Datura gardneri Hook.
Datura suaveolens Willd.
|Taxonomic Source(s):||Hay, A., Gottschalk, M. & Holguín, A. 2012. Huanduj - Brugmansia. Florilegium, Sydney & Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.|
|Taxonomic Notes:||This name is often misapplied to Brugmansia insignis.
Brugmansia species as a whole have sometimes been viewed as cultigens (e.g. Bristol 1966). This view was not accepted by Hay et al. (2012: 15) who view them as species long conserved through cultivation by indigenous people. There is no evidence for any of the species having come into being under human husbandry from wild progenitors, since no candidates for wild progenitors exist.
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Extinct in the Wild ver 3.1|
Most of the rationale for this assessment applies to all species of the genus:
|Range Description:||Lockwood (1973) formed the view that, despite the exclusive association of brugmansias with human habitation, native distributions of the species could be defined and recognised by the presence of intraspecific variability and high levels of fruit set, in contrast to low variability and low or absent fruit set in clones taken outside their native range.|
On that basis the distribution is understood to be the forested Atlantic coastal strip of eastern Brazil from northern Rio Grande do Sul to southern Bahia.
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Since this genus survives only in cultivation, the wild population of this species is zero. There are anecdotal views expressed by some indigenous healers that plants of this (and other) Brugmansia species are being eradicated from some indigenous gardens due to its toxicity and the declining numbers of healers expert enough to use it safely. However, there are no quantitative data.|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Cultivated and locally escaped at low elevation (below ca. 1000 m alt.), often in wet, marshy areas.|
|Use and Trade:||
There is a wide range of medicinal and spiritual uses, many shared with other species and hybrids, among the indigenous people who cultivate it (Hay et al. 2012: 22-73). It is grown as an ornamental plant, and is valued by horticultural collectors and hybridizers in Central and North America, the European Union and Australia in particular.
As with the rest of this genus, its usefulness, far from being a threat, appears to be what has allowed it to avoid complete extinction.
As with all other species of Brugmansia, there are no confirmed records at all of wild populations of B. suaveolens (however, it is particularly adept at vegetative propagation from stem fragments, for example along rivers).
The absence of wild plants was first recorded (albeit in relation to other Brugmansia species) by Ruiz & Pavón in the late 18th Century (Schultes & von Thene de Jamarillo-Arango 1998: 114). Later, in spite of decades of field work in NW South America, R.E. Schultes and his students Lockwood and Bristol, who specialised in this genus and other neotropical psychoactive plants, recorded finding no wild brugmansias at all (Bristol 1966, Lockwood 1973). Recent examination by Hay of numerous herbarium collections has turned up no specimens collected from the wild (Hay et al. 2012: 172).
While it is valued by those who know well how to use it both medicinally and as an entheogen, it is feared for its toxicity and superstitions about its ‘evil’ nature by those who do not, and it is anecdotally reported as being eradicated from gardens, sometimes at the behest of local authorities in response to the use of scopolamine for criminal purposes.
Loss of interest in cultivating this species, through loss of traditional healing skills, as well as active steps to eradicate it in places are the principal and current threats, as with other Brugmansia species.
The complete absence of wild plants suggests, as with other Brugmansia species, that the disperser(s) is extinct. The continued existence of this species within its presumed native range is currently dependent on its being cultivated by indigenous people.
Its ongoing survival appears dependent on maintenance or rehabilitation of cultural traditions in which it is used. Education about its cultural and practical value, as well as its precarious conservation status seem essential to counteract the negativity with which these plants are often seen. Legal protection may be desirable to counteract knee-jerk eradication of the plants by local authorities in response to criminal use.
Getting a representative range of non-hybrid clones into cultivation in tropical botanic gardens, and breeding them, would seem a practical step.
Bristol, M. 1966. Notes on the species of tree daturas. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University 21: 229-248.
Hay, A., Gottschalk, M. & Holguín, A. 2012. Huanduj - Brugmansia. Florilegium, Sydney & Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 12 June 2014).
Lockwood, T.E. 1973. A Taxonomic Revision of Brugmansia (Solanaceae). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.
Ruiz, H. 1777-1788. Journals. [Later translated and published as: Schultes, R.E. & von Thenen de Jaramillo-Arango, M.J.N. (1998). The Journals of Hipólito Ruiz: Spanish Botanist in Perú and Chile 1777–1788. Timber Press, Portland.].
Schultes, R.E. & von Thenen de Jaramillo-Arango, M.J.N. [translated from the original Spanish journals of Hipólito Ruiz]. 1998. The Journals of Hipólito Ruiz: Spanish Botanist in Perú and Chile 1777–1788. Timber Press, Portland.
|Citation:||Hay, A. 2014. Brugmansia suaveolens. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T51247699A58913403.Downloaded on 18 July 2018.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|