|Scientific Name:||Vertigo angustior Jeffreys, 1830|
Vertilla angustior Jeffreys, 1830
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Near Threatened ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Moorkens, E., Killeen, I. & Seddon, M.|
|Reviewer(s):||Cuttelod, A. & Neubert, E.|
The majority of the species' range lies within Europe, with isolated records outside the region to the east in N. Iran. As a consequence, the conservation assessment is based on the European assessment, but downgraded 1 category, to recognise the number of scattered populations lying outside Europe, which will contribute to the survival of the species. Hence it is listed as Near Threatened, based on the number of populations which are in decline, which are close to meeting the 30% decline threshold.
In Europe, this species is listed as Vulnerable (VU) A2ac+3c at the European level and at the level of the 27 member States of the European Union, based on the estimated loss of individuals in sites, combined with total loss of sub-populations from sites that have been well monitored since the Habitats Directive monitoring began and the lack of habitats in favourable condition as mentioned in recent EU reporting. In the main part of the range, this species is considered to be meeting the thresholds of 30% of population decline over the last 10 years. These declines are likely to become more severe in the future, as in this part of it's range this species has most of its range in salt-marsh/coastal dunes, within fringing habitats of a gradient of groundwater levels (often marginal strips of vegetation less than 5 m wide), and these habitats lie where sea defence construction will take place (especially in regions concerned about climate change and increased frequency of storm-surges at spring tides), and as such further declines in areas with pristine habitats might be expected.
The species has been revised since the last assessment as Conservation Dependant (1996), as this category was removed between version 2.3 and 3.1 of the IUCN categories and criteria.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
|Range Description:||This is mainly a European species ranging from southern Scandinavia to the Mediterranean and from Ireland to the Caspian Sea, with a scattered and often localised distribution in many countries (Cameron et al. 2003). It is not present in the southern part of Europe (Seddon pers. comm. 2011). The range extends eastwards, with scattered localities in Turkey (Schütt 2001), Russia (S. Urals and Crimea) extending to northern Iran (Sysov and Schileyko 2009).|
Native:Austria; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France (France (mainland)); Germany; Greece (Greece (mainland)); Hungary; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Ireland; Italy (Italy (mainland)); Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Romania; Russian Federation; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain (Spain (mainland)); Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom (Great Britain)
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||The population trend is thought to be decreasing. The UK has some of the biggest populations in Europe.|
Evidence from Ireland, where a significant 3 year survey (2008 – 2010) was undertaken on known extant sites, found 1 of the 21 sites had been totally destroyed (Moorkens and Killeen 2011). A further 7 sites had declined to a situation that the snail may already be lost or is likely to be lost in the near future (5% loss in the last 5 years, and 30% sites showing decline in the last 5 years). It should be noted that site losses were in inland wetland habitats.
The Favourable Reference Population (FRP) is ‘the population in a given biogeographical region considered the minimum necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the species’ (European Commission 2006). Expert opinion considers that in order to conserve the long term viability of Vertigo angustior in the Republic of Ireland, the population Conservation Status should be based upon maintaining the current number of sites in favourable condition and not on number of individuals which is an unreliable measure (see above). Thus sites that were classified as being in unfavourable condition for population (based on assessment of snail presence) were assessed using best expert opinion as to how much more area of occupancy they would have if they were in favourable condition. As the Favourable Reference Population of the species is greater than the Current Population, the population status is currently considered to be unfavourable.
The snail is particularly vulnerable in Europe at wetland sites, which are difficult to protect, and in coastal sites which may be subject to increasing inundation. The UK sites are currently in good condition, but the future prospects are considered to be potentially poor as the vast majority of the population is found along sea wall defences and in estuarine habitats that are becoming increasingly vulnerable to inundation. Pressure to increase sea level defences with stronger, steeper walls could destroy the populations depending on the older more vulnerable defence bunds.
Evidence from elsewhere in the range is missing in its precision due to the absence of targeted studies across the range, but proxy evidence can be taken from reporting by member states under Article 17 of the Habitats and Species Directive. The last round of reporting was in 2007, and member states returned assessments on range, population, habitat, future prospects and overall assessment under an assessment of either (i) favourable (green), (ii) unfavourable declining (amber) or (iii) unfavourable bad (red). The following member states have published their results as follows (2007 assessment), for the overall status of the species: Germany, France and Belgium - unfavourable bad (red), Ireland and the Netherlands - unfavourable declining (amber) and UK - Unknown.
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||At a broad level, it appears to be present in a very wide range of habitat categories of maritime dune grassland and maritime or inland wetland (including fen, marsh, salt marsh and flood plain), but the micro-habitat within which it is restricted means that the exact conditions which its presence demands are rare, and a lot of habitat that is “almost correct” is devoid of the snail. Where fixed dunes have the correct habitat conditions, the snail may cover a large area of occupancy. Otherwise, it can be found in an often narrow transition zone between saltmarsh and dune, and in transition zones between grassland and wetland with short herbs, mosses and Iris. In Cumbria, it occurs in moss on limestone pavement. It is normally found on permanently moist but free-draining soils, not subject to prolonged inundation. Vertigo angustior is a groundwater-dependant species.|
|Use and Trade:||This species is not used.|
|Major Threat(s):||The main threats to this species are the modification of site hydrology, heavy grazing, lack of grazing, supplementary feeding of livestock, scrub encroachment, eutrophication, pesticides, exposure to leisure activities (especially on coastal sites) e.g. caravan parks and marinas, seawall construction and modification, managed retreat of coastal marshes, fragmentation of habitat, artificial planting on open ground, motorised vehicular damage to habitats, rise of temperatures and extremes, sea level rise and flooding.|
|Conservation Actions:||The species is redlisted in several European countries (e.g. GB, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Poland, most federal regions of Germany) (Cameron et al. 2003). While there now are a range of protected sites where this species is present, these require ongoing appropriate site management, and this should be enough to secure the species albeit at a smaller range of sites than at present (Moorkens pers. comm 2011), as losses are likely to continue at inland and marginal sites especially in western Europe. In the longer term, should there be loss of present habitat from sea-level rise, then many sites would not have space for movement into new areas and some of the larger populations in Western Europe would be threatened.|
Byrne, A., Moorkens, E.A., Anderson, R., Killeen, I.J. and Regan, E.C. 2009. Ireland Red List No. 2 – Non- Marine Molluscs. National Parks and Wildlife Service. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
Cameron, R.A.D., Colville, B., Falkner, G., Holyoak, G. A., Hornung, E., Killeen, I.J., Moorkens, E.A., Pokryszko, B.M., Proschwitz, T. von, Tattersfield, P. & Valovirta, I. 2003. Species accounts for snails of the genus Vertigo listed in Annex II of the Habitats Directive: In Speight, M.C.D., Moorkens, E.A. & Falkner, G. (Eds) “Proceedings of the Workshop on Conservation Biology of European Vertigo Species”. Dublin, 2002. Heldia: 151-170.
European Commission. 2006. Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitat's Directive: Explanatory notes and guidelines. http://www.artdata.slu.se/filer/gybs/notes_guidelines_report_art17_final.pdf
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2012.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 19 June 2012).
Moorkens, E.A. & Killeen, I.J. 2011. Monitoring and Condition Assessment of Populations of Vertigo geyeri, Vertigo angustior and Vertigo moulinsiana in Ireland. aNational Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government,, Dublin, Ireland.
Schütt, H. 2001. Die türkischen Landschnecken. 4th Edition. Acta Biologica Benrodis.
Sysoev, A. and Schileyko, A. 2009. Land Snails and Slugs of Russia and Adjacent Countries. Pensoft, Sofia - Moscow.
|Citation:||Moorkens, E., Killeen, I. & Seddon, M. 2012. Vertigo angustior. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e.T22935A16658012.Downloaded on 24 June 2018.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|