|Scientific Name:||Tapirus pinchaque|
|Species Authority:||(Roulin, 1829)|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Endangered A2cd+3cd; C1 ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Lizcano, D.J., Amanzo, J., Castellanos, A., Tapia, A. & Lopez-Malaga, C.M.|
This species is listed as Endangered due to an ongoing and suspected future decline inferred from habitat loss, fragmentation and hunting pressure. Population declines are estimated to be greater than 50% in the past 3 generations (33 years). Furthermore the causes of population decline have not ceased and are inferred to be greater than 50% decline in the next 3 generations (33 years). This is inferred from current trends of continued habitat loss, hunting estimates as well impacts of climate change, which will shift the suitable climatic conditions up the mountain. In addition there are estimated to be less than 2,500 mature individuals remaining, with an estimated continuing decline of at least 20% in the next 2 generations (22 years). There has been and remains significant hunting pressure in Ecuador, however in Colombia and Peru the hunting pressure on this species still continues. It is extremely rare to encounter an area with Mountain Tapirs where they are not being over-hunted. Overall the mountain tapir population is fragmented as a result of human activities. There has also been widespread cattle introduction into the last remaining mountain tapir refuges. For example, cattle have been observed to be forming reproducing families in western Sangay National Park. Illegal mining is an important threat that is increasing population fragmentation, increasing contamination of watersheds and increasing illegal hunting. Mining projects in northern Peru and central Andes of Colombia threatens to destroy the headwater cloud forests and paramos of the scant population of mountain tapirs there.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
Mountain Tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) is known from the Andean area of Columbia, Ecuador, and northernmost Peru were new records have been acquired from the southern Huancabanba depresure. In Ecuador new records have shown Mountain Tapirs occurring in areas previously thought unconnected such as in the southern part of Sangay National Park towards Podocarpus National Park. There are also new records in the Ecuadorian western Andes. T. pinchaque occurs in the Central Andes south of Nevados National Park (05º00'N) and in the Eastern Andes, south of Paramo de Sumapaz (04º30'N) in Bogotá. In Colombia, there are no tapirs in the Western Cordillera, northern part of the Central- and Eastern-Cordilleras, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Serrania de la Macarena and Cerro Tacarcuna. Historically the species has also been recorded in Venezuela, however, currently there is no evidence of its occurrence in this country. The southern limit now includes regions of Cajamarca and Lambayeque, specifically in Cañaris in Ferrañafe province and Querocoto in Chota province. The most threatened populations are those of the Central Cordillera between National Park Las Hermosas and National Park Nevado del Huila where large tracks of mature montane forests are being converted to opium fields. T. pinchaque is now extinct in much of its former range.
Native:Colombia; Ecuador; Peru
Regionally extinct:Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
The Mountain Tapir population is fragmented as a result of human activities and the total population is estimated to be less than 2,500 mature individuals with an estimated continuing decline of at least 20% in the next 2 generation (22 years).
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:|
The four major habitat types for Tapirus pinchaque are: Paramo, Jalca and Tropical montane forest. Elevations range from 1,400 m to the snowline (Downer 1997).
|Generation Length (years):||11|
|Use and Trade:||This species is hunted for food, use of hides and medicinal uses.|
Formerly hunting pressure was the primary threat through most areas of the Mountain Tapir’s distribution (C. Downer pers. comm.) but today, poppy growing and its eradication, warfare and habitat fragmentation are currently the main threats on this species (E. Constantino pers. comm.). In some areas, hunting is decreasing due to local regulations and people’s increased awareness of this species’ rarity and conservation status. While a few Mountain Tapir populations may benefit because guerrilla presence which may relieve colonization pressure in Colombia by promoting the abandonment of conflict areas (C. Downer pers. comm.), most local biologists feel the presence of the guerrilla is having an overall negative impact on the species’ conservation. Additionally, the “actors” of the armed conflicts in Colombia (army, guerrilla, and paramilitaries) see the presence of field biologists and researchers in the areas that they control as a threat for their safety (Dávalos 2001, Semple 2000). The slow reproduction rate, large home range, and generally solitary nature of Mountain Tapirs make them particularly vulnerable to destruction of habitat and fragmentation by encroaching agriculture (Downer 1997). Habitat fragmentation is caused by conversion of forests and páramos to cattle ranching and agricultural lands. Another major threat to mountain tapirs in Colombia and Peru is the development of new mining projects and illegal mining contaminating water sources.
Additional threats include the development of hydroelectric dams, highways crossing protected areas, petroleum exploration, and electrical networks etc. There are numerous reports of tapir being hit by cars so infrastructure development through habitat is a potential major threat. There are numerous proposed highway and other projects in the Andes which would greatly increase vehicular mortalities. Once the construction of these highways is finalized, the vehicles will be able to drive at high speed and the animals crossing the roads will become even more vulnerable. Additionally, these roads will provide easier access to poachers, given the fact that the park lacks enough park rangers to patrol and protect the area.
Widespread cattle introduction into the last remaining Mountain Tapir refuges is a serious problem which will likely escalate in the near future. Cattle is a serious risk of transmission of infectious diseases and other etiological agents that they may carry. Disease transmission from cattle has been documented for Mountain, Baird’s and lowland tapirs in other locations. Another problem in Colombia are the fumigations being conducted in National Parks and all zones where cultivation of drugs can be found, including Andean forests in the Central and Oriental Cordilleras. These fumigations are authorized and promoted by the Colombian government, and are a major threat for the mountain tapir populations. The habitat is seriously affected and the animals can possibly be poisoned when in contact with the poison used for the fumigations (Round-Up), which is selective but can affect the availability of food resources.
Included on CITES Appendix I. Legal protection of the species is in place in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru (Downer 1997). In the Andes of Colombia there are 23 National Parks, of which tapirs are found in only seven (Cordillera los Picachos, Cueva de los Guacharos, Las Hermosas, Los Nevados, Nevado del Huila, Purace, and Sumapaz).
In Colombia, Complejo Volcanico Doña Juana Cascabel National Park is a new protected area in the Mountain Tapir range. T. pinchaque is the focal species for conservation in Los Nevados National Park, Las Hermosas National Park, Nevado del Huila National Park and Purace. The National Plan for the tapirs conservation is published by the Ministry of Environment and has become the guide for tapir conservation actions in the country.
Local NGOs and communities are working in the northern range of T. pinchaque distribution to conserve the ecosystem services provided by the forest and paramo. The government has categorized the Mountain Tapir as a critically endangered species.
Brooks, D.M., Bodmer, R.E. and Matola, S. 1997. Tapirs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Dávalos, L.M. 2001. The San Lucas mountain range in Colombia: how much conservation is owed to the violence? Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 69-78.
Downer, C.C. 1997. Status and Action Plan of the Mountain Tapir (Tapirus pinchaque). In: D. M. Brooks, R. E. Bodmer and S. Matola (eds), Tapirs - Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, pp. 10-22. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
Lizcano D.J., Pizarro, V., Cavelier, J. and Carmona, J. 2002. Geographic distribution and population size of the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) in Colombia. Journal of Biogeography 29(1): 7-15.
Semple, K. 2000. A habitat held hostage (FARC guerrillas drive out researchers). Audubon 102: 82-103.
Suárez-Mejía, J.A. and Lizcano, D.J. 2002. Conflict between mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) and farmers in the Colombian Central Andes. Tapir Conservation. IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group.
Tirira, D. 1999. Mamiferos del Ecaudor. Museo de Zoologia, Centro de Biodiversidad y Ambiente, Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecaudor and Sociedad para la Investigación y Monitoreo de la Biodiversidad Ecuatoriana, Quito, Ecuador.
|Citation:||Lizcano, D.J., Amanzo, J., Castellanos, A., Tapia, A. & Lopez-Malaga, C.M. 2016. Tapirus pinchaque. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T21473A45173922.Downloaded on 28 May 2017.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|