|Scientific Name:||Conocarpus erectus|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Ellison, A., Farnsworth, E. & Moore, G.|
|Reviewer(s):||Polidoro, B.A., Livingstone, S.R. & Carpenter, K.E. (Global Marine Species Assessment Coordinating Team)|
This species is widespread and tolerant of a variety of habitats. Relative to the other mangrove species within the wider Caribbean, the conservation status of this species appears to be more stable. However, this species is threatened by the loss of mangrove habitat throughout its range, primarily due to extraction and coastal development, and there has been an estimated 17% decline in mangrove area within this species range since 1980. Mangrove species are more at risk from coastal development and extraction at the extremes of their distribution, and are likely to be contracting in these areas more than in other areas. It is also likely that changes in climate due to global warming will further affect these parts of the range. Although there are overall range declines in many areas, they are not enough to reach any of the threatened category thresholds. This species is listed as Least Concern.
|Range Description:||This species is widely distributed in coastal communities in tropical America and West Africa (Tomlinson 1986). It can be found throughout Florida and to the Bahamas and West Indies south to Brazil. In the Eastern Pacific, it is present in Mexico through Central America to Ecuador and the Galapagos. It is also found in West Africa (Howard 1989). It was introduced in Hawaii, where it may possibly be invasive (Allen 1998, Chimner et al. 2006).
The distribution of this species throughout the south mid-Atlantic Islands should be confirmed.
Native:Angola (Angola); Anguilla; Antigua and Barbuda; Bahamas; Barbados; Belize; Benin; Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (Saba, Sint Eustatius); Brazil; Cameroon; Cayman Islands; Colombia; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the; Costa Rica; Côte d'Ivoire; Cuba; Curaçao; Dominica; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; El Salvador; Equatorial Guinea; France; French Guiana; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Grenada; Guadeloupe; Guatemala; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Guyana; Haiti; Honduras; Jamaica; Liberia; Martinique; Mauritania; Mexico; Montserrat; Netherlands Antilles (Bonaire); Nicaragua; Nigeria; Panama; Peru; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Saint Martin (French part); Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; Sao Tomé and Principe; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Sint Maarten (Dutch part); Suriname; Togo; Trinidad and Tobago; Turks and Caicos Islands; United States; United States Minor Outlying Islands; Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of; Virgin Islands, British
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:||
Atlantic – eastern central; Atlantic – southeast; Atlantic – southwest; Atlantic – western central; Pacific – eastern central; Pacific – southeast
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Although there is no species specific population information, it can be assumed that there are areas of population decline throughout its range due to coastal development. However, this species is considered somewhat weedy in southern Florida (Tomlinson 1986).|
|Habitat and Ecology:||
This species typically grows in the intertidal regions of sheltered tropical and subtropical coasts (Saenger 2002) restricted in areas where the salinity does not exceed 10 g/kg (Chen and Twilley 1999). This species is considered a shrub or tree, growing to 1.5 - 10 m. Growth habit is prostrate in rocky or sandy habitats and erect elsewhere (Howard 1989). This species may demonstrate plasticity in leaf size/shape in response to wind sheer, having most 'streamlined' leaf when compared to the common western mangroves (red, black, and white) making it resilient to high winds (Barrera and Walter 2006).
This species includes ever-growing shrubs to small trees with no protected terminal buds, thus requiring dormancy in winter (e.g. south Florida populations) (Tomlinson 1986). Flowering and fruiting are continuous throughout the year (Hernandez and Espino 1999). C. erectus has non-viviparous seeds which float and can be dispersed by water. Seed production is high but many are aborted or do not germinate (Tomlinson 1986). Seed viability is shown to be <12% (Hernandez and Espino 1999). The stems can sprout vegetatively (post hurricane) but experimental rooting success of cuttings was shown to be limited (Benitez-Pardo et al. 2002).
This species provides habitat for a number of species including crabs and also bald eagles (Curnutt and Robertson 1994). As an integral component of most western mangrove assemblages, C. erectus helps buffer the upper edge of highly valuable intertidal mangrove habitats, thus helping to maintain critical habitat.
|Use and Trade:||
This species is exploited for rudimentary construction, fuelwood and clearing for usable land (Ellison and Farnsworth 1996; Hernandez and Espino 1999). The wood is hard and slow-burning, ideal for fuelwood (Howard 1989) and cooking because the smoke has mesquite-like odour.
Varietals have been cultivated for horticultural purposes (Tomlinson 1986, Howard 1989, Alvarez-Leon 2003).
Although local estimates are uncertain due to differing legislative definitions of what is a 'mangrove' and to the imprecision in determining mangrove area, current consensus estimates of mangrove loss in the last quarter-century report an approximately 17% decline in mangrove areas in countries within this species range since 1980 (FAO, 2007).
All mangrove ecosystems occur within mean sea level and high tidal elevations, and have distinct species zonations that are controlled by the elevation of the substrate relative to mean sea level. This is because of associated variation in frequency of elevation, salinity and wave action (Duke et al. 1998). With rise in sea-level, the habitat requirements of each species will be disrupted, and species zones will suffer mortality at their present locations and re-establish at higher elevations in areas that were previously landward zones (Ellison 2005). If sea-level rise is a continued trend over this century, then there will be continued mortality and re-establishment of species zones. However, species that are easily dispersed and fast growing/fast producing will cope better than those which are slower growing and slower to reproduce.
In addition, mangrove area is declining globally due to a number of localized threats. The main threat is habitat destruction and removal of mangrove areas. Reasons for removal include cleared for shrimp farms, agriculture, fish ponds, rice production and salt pans, and for the development of urban and industrial areas, road construction, coconut plantations, ports, airports, and tourist resorts. Other threats include pollution from sewage effluents, solid wastes, siltation, oil, and agricultural and urban runoff. Climate change is also thought to be a threat, particularly at the edges of a species range. Natural threats include cyclones, hurricane and tsunamis.
There are no conservation measures specific to this species, but its range may include some marine and coastal protected areas. Continued monitoring and research is recommended, as well as the inclusion of mangrove areas in marine and coastal protected areas. Relative to the other mangrove species within the wider Caribbean, the conservation status of this species appears to be stable.
Recommended conservation measures for this species include more research on population sizes. Conocarpus erectus's range is well established but updates to population sizes, fluctuations or losses need to be continued. It is recommended to expand GIS mapping and remote sensing projects (e.g. Cohen and Lara 2003) and regional scale habitat mapping (e.g. Layman et al. 2006). Demographic modeling could be useful: research is needed to establish a minimum viable population size for the taxon, as past and present exploitative uses threaten to exert continued impacts throughout its range. Continued studies of post-hurricane recovery, restoration performance, in particular restoration of multispecies complexes and mangrove associates, are needed. The value of this mangrove upper boundary species to the protection/buffering of intertidal mangroves from land-based impacts should be better articulated in the literature.
Adonizio, A.L., Downum, K., Bennett, B.C. and Mathee, K. 2006. Anti-quorum sensing activity of medicinal plants in southern Florida. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105(3): 427-435.
Al-Humaid, A.I. 2005. Effects of hydrophilic polymer on the survival of buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) seedlings grown under drought stress. European Journal of Horticultural Science 70(6): 283-288.
Alleng, G.P. 1998. Historical development of the Port Royal mangrove wetlands, Jamaica. Journal of Coastal Research 14(3): 951-959.
Allen, J.A. 1998. Mangroves as alien species: the case of Hawaii. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 7(1): 61-71.
Alvarez-Leon, R. 2003. Mangroves of Columbia and rehabilitation of degraded areas: bibliographic review and new studies. Madera y Bosques 9(1): 3-25.
Armah, A.K., Waife, G. and Kpelle, D.G. 2005. Sea-level rise and coastal biodiversity in West Africa: a case from Ghana. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barrera, E. and Mhartmut, S.W. 2006. Wind effects on leaf morphology for the mangrove Conocarpus erectus at an oceanic island from the Mexican Pacific Ocean. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79: 451-463.
Benitez Pardo, D., Flores Verdugo, F., et al. 2002. Vegetative propagation of tree species in a mangrove forest on the north Pacific coast of Mexico. Maders y Bosques 8(2): 57-71.
Calderon-Saenz, E. 1984. Occurrence of the mangrove, Pelliciera rhizophorae, on the Caribbean coast of Colombia with biogeographical notes. Bulletin of Marine Science 35(1): 105-110.
Chen, R. and Twilley, R.R. 1999. Patterns of mangrove forest structure and soil nutrient dynamics along the Shark River Estuary, Florida. Estuaries 22(4): 955-970.
Chimner, R. A., Fry, B., Kaneshiro, M.Y. and Cormier, N. 2006. Current extent and historical expansion of introduced mangroves on O'ahu, Hawai'I. Pacific Science 60(3): 377-383.
Corcoran, E., Ravilious, C. and Skuja, M. 2007. Mangroves of Western and Central Africa. UNEP-Regional Seas Programme/UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
Curnutt, J.L. and Robertson Jr., W.B. 1994. Bald eagle nest site characteristics in South Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 58(2): 218-221.
Duke, N.C., Ball, M.C. and Ellison, J.C. 1998. Factors influencing biodiversity and distributional gradients in mangroves. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 7: 27-47.
Duke, N.C., Pinzon, Z.S. and Prada, M.C.T. 1997. Large-scale damage to mangrove forests following two large oil spills in Panama. Biotropica 29(1): 2-14.
Ellison, A.M. and Farnsworth, E.J. 1996. Anthropogenic Disturbance of Caribbean Mangrove Ecosystems: Past Impacts, Present Trends, and Future Predictions. Biotropica 28(4): 549-565.
Ellison, J.C. 2005. Holocene palynology and sea-level change in two estuaries in Southern Irian Jaya. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220: 291-309.
FAO. 2007. The World's Mangroves 1980-2005. FAO Forestry Paper 153. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
Hernandez, C.T. and Espino, G. 1999. Ecologia, produccion y aprovechemiento del mangle Conocarpus erectus L., en Barra de Tecoanapa Guerrero, Mexico. Biotropica 31(1): 121-134.
Imbert, D., Rousteau, A. and Scherrer, P. 2000. Ecology of mangrove growth and recovery in the Lesser Antilles: State of knowledge and basis for restoration. Restoration Ecology 8(3): 230-236.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.2). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 29 June 2010).
Lacerda, L.D. 2002. Mangrove Ecosystems: Function and Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Lara-Dominguez, A.L., Day Jr., J.W., Villalobos Zapata, G., Twilley, R.R., Alvarez Guillén, H. and Yáñez-Arancibia, A. 2005. Structure of a unique inland mangrove forest assemblage in fossil lagoons on the Caribbean Coast of Mexico. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13: 111-122.
Layman, C., Moore, G., et al. 2006. Grenada and Grenadines Wetland Assessment: Preliminary findings. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Caribbean Programme.
McCoy, E.D., Mushinsky, H.R., Johnson, D. and Meshaka, W.E. 1996. Mangrove damage cause by Hurricane Andrew on the southwestern coast of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 59: 1-8.
Mizrachi, D., Pannier, R., et al. 1978. Study on some characteristics of the propagation and implantation strategies of Conocarpus erectus L. Seminar on Scientific Study and Human Impact on the Mangrove Ecosystem, Cali, Colombia, UNESCO, Montevideo (Uruguay). ROSTLAC.
Pournavab, R.F., Cespedes-Cabriales, A.E., Alvarado-Vazquez, M.A., Badii Z., M.H., Cepeda, T.T. and Maiti, R.K. 2006. Mangroves: natural biofilters of heavy metals in Mexican Gulf. Research on Crops 7(3): 838-843.
Proffit, C.E. and Devlin, D.J. 2005. Long-term growth and succession in restored and natural mangrove forests in southwestern Florida. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13: 531-551.
Saenger, P. 2002. Mangrove ecology, silviculture and conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Spalding, M.D., Blasco, F. and Field, C.D. (eds). 1997. World Mangrove Atlas. The International Society for mangrove Ecosystems, Okinawa, Japan.
Tomlinson, P.B. 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wilkie, M.L. and Fortuna, S. 2003. Status and trends in mangrove area extent wordwide. FAO Working Paper FRA 63. FAO, Rome, Italy.
|Citation:||Ellison, A., Farnsworth, E. & Moore, G. 2010. Conocarpus erectus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 23 August 2014.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided|