|Scientific Name:||Phelsuma andamanense|
|Species Authority:||Blyth, 1861|
Gecko chameleon Tytler, 1864
Phelsuma madagascariensis subspecies andamanense Blyth, 1861
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Richman, N. & Böhm, M.|
|Reviewer(s):||Collen, B. & Ram, M. (Sampled Red List Index Coordinating Team)|
|Contributor(s):||Zug, G., De Silva, R., Milligan, H.T., Wearn, O.R., Wren, S., Zamin, T., Sears, J., Wilson, P., Lewis, S., Lintott, P. & Powney, G.|
Phelsuma andamanense has been assessed as Least Concern due to its ability to tolerate anthropogenic environments. However, as this species has a small range, monitoring of the population is still recommended to identify any potential declines.
|Range Description:||This species inhabits the Andaman and Nicobar islands which have a total land area of 8,120 km².|
Native:India (Andaman Is., Nicobar Is.)
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Sharma (2002) states that the overall population status of this species is undetermined, but it is common in many localities.|
|Habitat and Ecology:||This species is able to inhabit highly modified environments. It has been recorded in gardens containing smooth palms and plantain trees, as well as in and around human habitation (Whitaker and Whitaker 1978, Sharma 2002, Daniel 2002). It has also been found in peepal, papaya, and occasionally exotic street trees (Whitaker and Whitaker 1978).|
|Major Threat(s):||The Nicobar and Andaman Islands have been and continue to be deforested, leading to extensive grasslands in certain areas (Khatri 1993). The main drivers are clearance for cash crops and monoculture plantations. The Andaman and Nicobar islands were also hit by the Asian Tsunami of 2004. The effect of the influx of salt-water and wreckage into the interior of islands is yet to be assessed (BirdLife International 2006).|
|Conservation Actions:||There are no known species-specific conservation measures in place for this species. There are a number of protected areas in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, but this network is still considered inadequate for the effective conservation of the endemics to the region (BirdLife International 2006). As a result, population monitoring is recommended.|
Austin, J.J., Arnold, E.N. and Jones, C.G. 2004. Reconstructing an island radiation using ancient and recent DNA: the extinct and living day geckos (Phelsuma) of the Mascarene islands. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 109-122.
BirdLife International. 2006. BirdLife's online World Bird Database: the site for bird conservation (version 2.0). Available at: www.birdlife.org.
CAMP Workshop. 1997. Conservation Assessment and Management Plan Workshop: Reptiles of India. Biodiversity Conservation Prioritisation Project, India. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Coimbatore, India.
Daniel, J.C. 2002. The Book of Indian Reptiles and Amphibians. Oxford University Press / Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.4). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 27 October 2010).
Khatri, T.C. 1993. Butteflies of the Andaman and Nicobar islands: conservation concerns. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 32: 170-184.
Sharma, R.C. 2002. Fauna of India and adjacent countries. Reptilia Volume II (Sauria). Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.
Whitaker, R. and Whitaker, Z. 1978. Notes on Phelsuma andamanense, the Andaman day gecko or green gecko. Journal of the Bomaby Natural History Society 75: 497-499.
Zug, G.R. 2007. pers. comm. Red List Assessment.
|Citation:||Richman, N. & Böhm, M. 2010. Phelsuma andamanense. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 29 July 2014.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided|