|Scientific Name:||Neophoca cinerea (Péron, 1816)|
According to Rice (1998) the taxonomy of Phocarctos of New Zealand and Neophoca of Australia was confused until clarified by King (1960).
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Endangered A2bd ver 3.1|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Lowry, L., Ahonen, H., Chiozza, F. & Battistoni, A.|
The high proportion of small, genetically isolated subpopulations for this species is likely a consequence of sequential declines brought about by historical sealing, more recent takes, and sustained fisheries bycatch over the last 40+ years. The major causes for reduction based on observed and potential levels of bycatch in gillnet and trap fisheries are known and management measures have been introduced to mitigate these impacts in parts of the species range, but declines have not ceased. Declines for four subpopulations range from 46% to 87% over three generations, and declines are inferred in other depleted subpopulations. A global assessment based on ca 48% of the species-wide pup production, suggests the species has declined by 57% in three generations. Australian Sea Lions should be classified by IUCN as Endangered under criterion A2bd.
|Previously published Red List assessments:|
The Australian Sea Lion is endemic to Australia. Its extant breeding range extends from The Pages Islands (just east of Kangaroo Island) in South Australia to Houtman Abrolhos on the west coast of Western Australia. Pupping has been recorded at 81 island and mainland sites; 47 in South Australia and 34 in Western Australia (Shaughnessy et al. 2011, Goldsworthy et al. 2013, Goldsworthy unpublished data).
Native:Australia (South Australia, Tasmania - Regionally Extinct, Western Australia)
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:|
Indian Ocean – eastern
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||Despite the large number of breeding sites (81) used by Australian Sea Lions, only seven sites produce more than 100 pups per breeding season, all of which are in South Australia. The average pup production per breeding site is just 40, with most sites (70%), producing fewer than 30 pups per breeding season (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, Goldsworthy unpublished data).|
The species can be broadly separated into three main meta-populations: one in Southern Australia accounting for ca 84% of pup production; one on the south coast of Western Australia accounting for ca 10% of pup production; and one on the west coast of Western Australia accounting for ca 6% of pup production (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, Goldsworthy unpublished data). One very isolated breeding site at Twilight Cove in Western Australia lies 400 km distant from the nearest breeding sites to the east and west, and is considered an additional population.
Total pup production for the species currently is estimated to be 3,204; with 2,691 in South Australia, 335 off the south coast of Western Australia, and 182 off the west coast of Western Australia (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, Shaughnessy et al. 2011, Goldsworthy et al. 2013, Goldsworthy unpublished data). Pup production to total population multipliers developed for the species range from 3.83 to 4.08 (Goldsworthy and Page 2007, Goldsworthy et al. 2010) giving a total population estimate of ca 12,690 (range 12,290–13,090). Based on an age-structured model (Goldsworthy et al. 2010), the number of mature animals in the population is ca. 6,500 (Goldsworthy, unpublished data).
Based on age-structure data that are available from one Australian Sea Lion population (Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island), generation time is estimated to be 12.4-12.8 years (Goldsworthy and Page 2007). Hence three generations is equivalent to ca 38 years.
Robust data on trends in pup production per breeding season (an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon) are available for a subset of subpopulations, mostly in South Australia. Pup production has declined for four main breeding subpopulations/regions: Seal Bay (~2% decline per breeding season or ~46% decline over three generations); nine subpopulations along the Bunda Cliffs (a 39% decline in mean maximum number of pups counted per site over 19 years, or ~64% decline over three generations); Olive Island (a ~8% decline per breeding season or 32% decline over seven years, equivalent to ~87% decline over three generations); and West Waldegrave Island (a ~42% decline in 10 years or a ~87% decline over three generations). Based on a global assessment of the species from data available for 23 subpopulations (accounting for ~48% of the species-wide pup production), total pup production has declined by 57% in three generations (Goldsworthy, unpublished data).
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Australian Sea Lions are sexually dimorphic, with adult males reaching 1.25 times the length and 2.5-3.5 times the weight of adult females. Very little information on sizes of adult males is available, and some values in the literature may be overestimates. Adult males reach lengths of 1.8-2.5 m and weigh 180-250 kg. Females are 1.3-1.8 m in length and weigh 61-105 kg. At birth, pups are approximately 60-70 cm long and weigh 6-9 kg (Lowther and Goldsworthy 2011). Pups are dark chocolate brown to charcoal in colour at birth and lighten to a smoky grey before becoming brown. The pelage pattern of pups up until their moult at around 4 months of age is highly variable.|
Females become sexually mature at 4.5-6 years of age and males at six years or more. The mean age of breeding females is 11 years (McIntosh 2007). The oldest breeding female recorded was aged 24 years, while the maximum longevity recorded is 26 years for females and 21.5 years for males (McIntosh 2007). Age-specific survival probabilities are high (0.98) after six years of age and are similar for males and females (McIntosh 2007).
Australian Sea Lions are unique among pinnipeds, being the only species that has a non-annual breeding cycle, with intervals between pupping seasons of ~17–18 months (Ling and Walker 1978, Higgins and Gass 1993, Shaughnessy et al. 2006, Goldsworthy et al. 2014). Furthermore, breeding seasons are protracted in duration (4-9 months), and occur asynchronously across the species range (breeding can occur at any time of the year) (Shaughnessy et al. 2006, Goldsworthy et al. 2014). Asynchronous breeding is maintained through extremely low rates of interchange between colonies by adult females, as demonstrated by genetic studies that indicate extreme population sub-structuring of mitochondrial DNA lineages (maternally inherited), even for those separated by short distances (Campbell et al. 2008, Goldsworthy and Lowther 2010, Lowther et al. 2012). The evolutionary determinants of this unusual reproductive strategy remain enigmatic (Goldsworthy et al. 2009). Given the high level of genetic subdivision at the breeding colony scale, individual breeding colonies are considered subpopulations in this species (Campbell et al. 2008, Lowther 2010, Lowther et al. 2012).
The low synchrony of births within a breeding season requires males to mate-guard individual females until they come into oestrus around 7–10 days following the birth of the pup. Males are therefore sequentially polygynous, mate-guarding individual females until the male is compelled to go to sea and forage, after which he returns and repeats the strategy. Males defend their female(s) with guttural clicking, growling and barking vocalizations, posturing, and by fighting with rivals. Like most pinnipeds, there is a 4–6 month period of delayed implantation of the blastocyst following conception. This leads to a prolonged (active) placental gestation of up to 14 months, the longest for any pinniped (Gales and Costa 1997). The annual pregnancy rate of mature females is ~71 % (Higgins and Gass 1993).
Pups are continuously attended for the first 9–10 days after birth by their mother, after which adult females alternate between foraging trips to sea and nursing bouts ashore. Females nurse their pups for 15–18 months, usually weaning them before giving birth again, however females will nurse offspring for three or more years if they do not pup in the subsequent breeding season or their new pup dies. Adult female Australian Sea Lions behave aggressively toward pups that are not their own. Pups will play at the shoreline and in tide pools while their mothers are away, and following their postnatal moult, will actively swim on their own. Pups commence their own foraging trips at a young age and by six months can occupy part of adult female home range and explore adult foraging habitat at least eight months prior to weaning, allowing them to learn the location of suitable foraging habitat and the skills required to hunt successfully (Lowther and Goldsworthy 2012).
Australian Sea Lions restrict their foraging activities to continental shelf waters, with juveniles, adult females and adult males rarely exceeding depths of 90, 130, and 150 m, respectively (Goldsworthy et al. 2010). The maximum recorded dive depth for an adult male is ~250 m (Goldsworthy unpublished data). The maximum recorded foraging ranges of juvenile and adult female seals are 118 and 190 km, respectively (Goldsworthy et al. 2010). Adult males range much further and have been tracked up to 340 km from their colony. There is marked within and between-colony variability in the foraging behaviour of juveniles, adult females, and males (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, Goldsworthy et al. 2010, Lowther and Goldsworthy 2011, Lowther et al. 2012). Foraging trips to sea are relatively short compared to other otariids (mean 1.1 day and maximum 5.1 days in juveniles; mean 1.2 day and maximum 6.2 days in adult females; mean of 2.5 days and maximum 6.7 days in adult males; Higgins 1993, Higgins and Gass 1993, Lowther and Goldsworthy 2011, Kirkwood and Goldsworthy 2013). Australian Sea Lions are benthic, diurnal foragers that routinely transit to foraging locations by swimming along the bottom and dive continuously while at sea and forage at all times of day (Costa and Gales 2003). During dives they minimize the time spent during the descent and ascent phases in order to maximize foraging time on the seabed. Individual dives rarely exceed eight minutes in duration enabling animals to perform around 10–11 dives per hour (Kirkwood and Goldsworthy 2013). Australian Sea Lions are fast, powerful swimmers and often “porpoise” out of the water when moving rapidly at the surface.
The diet of the Australian Sea Lion is poorly understood. Dietary information available is based on limited scat (faeces), digestive tract (autopsied dead animals), and regurgitate analyses (Gales and Cheal 1992, Ling 1992, McIntosh et al. 2006), some crittercam footage (Fragnito 2013), and analyses of prey DNA recovered from faeces (Peters et al. 2014). Cephalopods appear to be a key component of the diet, and include Octopus (Octopodidae), Squid (Loliginidae), and Cuttlefish (Sepiidae) species. Key fish taxa include Leatherjackets (Monacanthidae), Wrasse (Labridae), Flatheads (Platycephalidae), Perch (Sebastidae, Serranidae), Cods (Moridae), Mullets (Mullidae), and Nannygai/Redfish (Berycidae), Whiting (Siikginidae), Rock-ling, and Stingaree /Fiddler Ray (Urolophidae, Rhinobatidae). Small pelagic fish including Jack Mackerel, Yellowtail Scad, and Australian Sardine, have been recorded in the diet, but are not common (McIntosh et al. 2006, Peters et al. 2014). Crustaceans have also been recorded in the diet and include crabs (Stone Crab), prawns, and Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii) (McIntosh et al. 2006, Fragnito 2013). Crittercam data indicate that diet and feeding behaviour can vary markedly between individual animals (Fragnito 2013).
Predators of Australian Sea Lions include Great White Sharks (Shaughnessy et al. 2007) and presumably Killer Whales (Ling 2002).
|Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:||No|
|Generation Length (years):||12.4-12.8|
|Movement patterns:||Not a Migrant|
|Congregatory:||Congregatory (and dispersive)|
|Use and Trade:||Australian aborigines have taken Australian Sea Lions for subsistence purposes for thousands of years. Early European colonists also took Sea Lions for food and other products, although numbers recorded in sealing logbooks were small (Ling 1999). Harvests by sealers in the 17th and 18th centuries reduced the population and extirpated them from areas around the Bass Strait and Tasmania. They are now protected by a variety of laws and are no longer hunted.|
Although now protected, Australian Sea Lions have not rebounded fully in numbers or reoccupied all of their former range. A range of anthropogenic factors have been identified which may be impacting the recovery of the Australian Sea Lion (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, DSEWPC 2013). The cumulative impact of many of these threats may vary across the range of the species. Fisheries bycatch (especially in gillnets) and entanglement in marine debris appear to pose the greatest threat to the Australian Sea Lion at present (Shaughnessy et al. 2003, Goldsworthy and Page 2007, Goldsworthy et al. 2010), while secondary threats include: habitat degradation and interactions with aquaculture operations; human disturbance to colonies; deliberate killings; disease; chemical pollution and oil spills; noise pollution; prey depletion and competition; and climate change (Goldsworthy et al. 2009, DSEWPC 2013). A substantial Sea Lion tourist industry has developed; this activity is regulated at Sea Lion colonies in parks to minimize disturbance during the breeding season.
This species is protected in Australia by State Conservation agencies under numerous independently enacted state laws, the earliest dating back to 1889. The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 provides protection for all pinnipeds in Australia. The Australian Sea Lion was listed as a Threatened species in the Vulnerable category under that Act in 2005. It is listed as a protected species (rare) in South Australia under the National Parks and Wildlife Act, 1972. In Western Australia they are protected under section 14 of the Wildlife Conservation Act, 1950 and are listed as specially protected in Western Australia under the Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected) Fauna Notice 2005.
Between 2010 and 2012, the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) introduced a range of management measures into the shark gillnet component of the Gillnet Hook and Trap (GHAT) fishery to mitigate the impacts of bycatch mortality on Australian Sea Lion populations off South Australia (AFMA 2010). This followed research that integrated an on-board independent bycatch observer program on gillnet vessels, and an extensive Sea Lion satellite tracking and spatial modelling program (Goldsworthy et al. 2010). The management measures introduced include spatial closures (most between 4–10 nm) excluding the fishery around all Sea Lion colonies off South Australia, and bycatch trigger limits that place a cap on the total numbers of Sea Lions that are permitted to be caught within areas of the fishery, which if exceeded result in extended (18 month) fishery closures (AFMA 2012). Given there is 100% observer coverage in this fishery, mostly through electronic monitoring, there is high compliance and most Sea Lion bycatch is now reported in fishery logbooks (AFMA 2013). Additional management measures, such as switching gear to hook and line, are being considered. Bycatch of Australian Sea Lion pups and juveniles in Rock Lobster pots has been largely mitigated through the introduction of Sea Lion excluder devices in the Western Australian and South Australian Rock Lobster fisheries.
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA). 2010. Australian Sea Lion Management Strategy: Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF). Canberra, Australia.
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA). 2012. Australian Sea Lion bycatch triggers- changes to fisheries management arrangements to further protect Australian Sea Lion sub-populations in the Gillnet, Hook and Trap Fishery. Canberra, Australia.
Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA). 2013. Future Directions for the Gillnet Hook and Trap Sector. Future Directions for the Gillnet Hook and Trap Fishery. Available at: http://www.afma.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Future-Directions-for-the-Gillnet-Hook-and-Trap-Fishery-Publication-version.pdf . (Accessed: 9 June 2014).
Campbell, R., Gales, N., Lento, G. and Baker, S. 2008. Islands in the sea: extreme female natal site fidelity in the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea. Biology Letters 4: 139-142.
Costa, D.P. and Gales, N.J. 2003. Energetics of a benthic diver: seasonal foraging ecology of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea. Ecological Monographs 73(1): 27-43.
DSEWPC. 2013. Issues Paper for the Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca cinerea). Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra, Australia.
Fragnito, K. 2013. Identifying the foraging behaviour and foraging habitat of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea using National Geographic Crittercam. University of Adelaide.
Gales, N.J. and Cheal, A.J. 1992. Estimating diet composition of the Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea from scat analysis: an unreliable technique. Wildlife Research 19: 447-456.
Gales, N.J. and Costa, D.P. 1997. The Australian sea lion: a review of an unusual life history. In: M. Hindell and C. Kemper (eds), Marine Mammal Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Vol. 1, Surrey Beatty and Sons, Devon, UK.
Goldsworthy, S.D. and Lowther, A.D. 2010. Genetic population structure and bycatch: assessment of management measures for reducing the bycatch of Australian sea lions in the demersal gillnet fishery off South Australia. SARDI Research Report Series No. 515. Adelaide, Australia.
Goldsworthy, S.D. and Lowther, A.D. and Shaughnessy, P.D. 2013. Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2011/12). SARDI Research Report Series No. 739.
Goldsworthy, S.D. and Page, B. 2007. A risk-assessment approach to evaluating the significance of seal bycatch in two Australian fisheries. Biological Conservation 139: 269-285.
Goldsworthy, S.D., McKenzie, J., Shaughnessy, P.D., McIntosh, R.R., Page, B. and Campbell, R. 2009. An update of the report: understanding the impediments to the growth of Australian sea lion populations. SARDI Research Report Series Number 356. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide.
Goldsworthy, S.D., Page, B., Shaughnessy, P.D. and Linnane, A. 2010. Mitigating Seal Interactions in the SRLF and the Gillnet Sector SESSF in South Australia. SARDI Research Report Series No. 405.
Higgins, L.V. 1993. The nonannual, nonseasonal breeding cycle of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 270-274.
Higgins, L.V. and Gass, L. 1993. Birth to weaning – parturition, duration of lacation and attendance cycles of Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea). Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 2047-2055.
IUCN. 2015. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.2. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 23 June 2015).
King, J. 1960. Sea-lions of the genera Neophoca and Phocarctos. Mammalia 24: 445-456.
Kirkwood, R. and Goldsworthy, S.D. 2013. Fur Seals and Sea Lions. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
Ling, J.K. 1992. Neophoca cinerea. Mammalian Species 392: 1-7.
Ling, J.K. 1999. Exploitation of fur seals and sea lions from Australian, New Zealand and adjacent subantarctic islands during the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Australian Zoology 32: 323-350.
Ling, J.K. 2002. Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea. In: W.F. Perrin, B. Wursig and J.G.M. Thewissen (eds), Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, pp. 51-54. Academic Press.
Lowther, A.D. and Goldsworthy, S.D. 2011. Maternal strategies of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) at Dangerous Reef, South Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 59: 54-62.
Lowther, A.D. and Goldsworthy, S.D. 2012. Head start: Australian sea lion pups gain experience of adult foraging grounds before weaning. Marine Biology 159: 2687-2696.
Lowther, A.D., Harcourt, R.G., Goldsworthy, S.D. and Stow, A. 2012. Population structure of adult female Australian sea lions is driven by fine-scale foraging site fidelity. Animal Behaviour 83: 691-701.
McIntosh, R.R. 2007. The life history and population demographics of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea. La Trobe University.
Peters, K.J., Ophelkeller, K., Bott, N.J., Deagle, B.E., Jarman, S.N. and Goldsworthy, S.D. 2014. Fine-scale diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) using DNA-based analysis of faeces. Marine Ecology Article first published online: 12 MAR 2014 doi: 10.1111/maec.12145.
Rice, D.W. 1998. Marine Mammals of the World: Systematics and Distribution. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Rice, D.W. 1998. Marine Mammals of the World: Systematics and Distribution. Society for Marine Mammalogy, Lawrence, Kansas.
Shaughnessy, P.D., Dennis, T.E. and Berris, M. 2007. Predation on Australian sea lions Neophoca cinerea by white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in South Australia. Australian Mammology 29: 69-75.
Shaughnessy, P.D., Goldsworthy, S.D., Hamer, D.J., Page, B. and McIntosh, R.R. 2011. Australian sea lions Neophoca cinerea at colonies in South Australia: distribution and abundance, 2004 to 2008. Endangered Species Research 13: 87-98.
Shaughnessy, P.D., McIntosh, R.R., Goldsworthy, S.D., Dennis, T.E. and Berris, M. 2006. Trends in abundance of Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea, at Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. In: A.W. Trites, S.K. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S. Gelatt, L.D. Rea and K.M. Wynne (eds), Sea lions of the world, pp. 325-351. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
Shaughnessy, P., Kirkwood, R., Cawthorn, M., Kemper, C. and Pemberton, D. 2003. Pinnipeds, cetaceans and fisheries in Australia: a review of operational interactions. In: N. Gales, M. Hindell and R. Kirkwood (eds), Marine mammals: fisheries, tourism, and management issues, pp. 136-152. CSIRO Publishers, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
|Citation:||Goldsworthy, S.D. 2015. Neophoca cinerea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T14549A45228341.Downloaded on 23 January 2018.|