|Scientific Name:||Stenella longirostris ssp. orientalis|
|Species Authority:||Perrin 1990|
|Taxonomic Notes:||The eastern Spinner Dolphin is one of two subspecies described from the eastern tropical Pacific (Perrin 1990); the other is the Central American spinner dolphin, S. l. centroamericana.|
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Vulnerable A2d ver 3.1|
|Assessor(s):||Hammond, P.S., Bearzi, G., Bjørge, A., Forney, K.A., Karkzmarski, L., Kasuya, T., Perrin, W.F., Scott, M.D., Wang, J.Y. , Wells, R.S. & Wilson, B.|
|Reviewer(s):||Rojas-Bracho, L. & Smith, B.D.|
The Eastern Spinner Dolphin has declined 54.5–84.5% from historical levels (Wade et al. 2007). In the last three generations (41 years; Taylor et al. 2007), the population declined approximately 50% (from 1966 to 2007) (data from Wade et al. 2007, Gerrodette et al. 2005). Because this decline exceeds the 30% threshold for Vulnerable status (under A2d), the subspecies is categorized as Vulnerable.
The subspecies occupies a range of roughly 10 million km² in the eastern tropical Pacific, extending from about the equator to about 20° North latitude and from the coast of Mexico and Central America west to about 135° West longitude. The core of the range (highest densities of dolphins) is north of 5° N and east of 130° W (Perrin et al. 1991).
Subpopulations likely exist within the subspecies; spinners off northern Mexico (the "Tres Marias spinners") are longer on average than those farther to the south and offshore (Perryman and Westlake 1998), and peak timing of reproductive seasonality varies spatially within the range (Barlow 1984).
The map shows where the species may occur based on oceanography. The species has not been recorded for all the states within the hypothetical range as shown on the map. States for which confirmed records of the species exist are included in the list of native range states.
Native:Colombia (Malpelo I.); Costa Rica; Ecuador; El Salvador; France (Clipperton I.); Guatemala; Honduras; Mexico; Nicaragua; Panama
|FAO Marine Fishing Areas:||
Pacific – eastern central
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
The most recent estimate of abundance is about 613,000 animals (CV = 22%) based on sighting effort of roughly 300,000 km in 13 multi-vessel line-transect surveys conducted 1979–2003 (Gerrodette et al. 2005). Annual estimates ranged from 271,000 to 734,000. The population is estimated to have declined 54.5–84.5% (median 71.2%) from its original size of 1.3 million, beginning in the late 1950s and continuing into the mid- to late 1970s (Wade et al. 2007). Due to greatly reduced levels of directly observed bycatch in the fishery in the 1970s and 1980s to below sustainable levels, the decline stopped. The rate of increase between 1979 and 2003 has been estimated at 1.1%, an estimate not significantly different from zero (Gerrodette and Forcada 2005).
|Habitat and Ecology:||
Eastern Spinner Dolphins occur typically in the Eastern Pacific Warm Pool, a water mass characterized by high surface temperature and chlorophyll, low surface density and a shoal thermocline underlying a shallow mixed layer (Ballance et al. 2006). Pelagic dolphins are capable of moving 50 km or more in a single day (Perrin et al. 1979).
The eastern spinner dolphin commonly occurs together with Pantropical Spotted Dolphins (Stenella attenuata) in large aggregations and often accompanied by schools of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares). Tuna fishermen take advantage of the tuna-dolphin bond, using the dolphins as surface indicators of tuna and herding and capturing them to catch the tuna associated with them.
The diet is composed almost entirely of small deep-scattering-layer organisms that migrate toward the surface nocturnally: fishes such as myctophids, small squids and krill-sized crustaceans (Perrin et al. 1973, Galván Magaña 1999)
The major threat to the subspecies has been bycatch in the tuna purse seine fishery, which has caused a decline of 65% in abundance since 1959 (Reilly et al. 2005). Since the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) implemented per-vessel mortality limits on the international fleet, the annual mortality for the Eastern Spinner Dolphins has decreased, to 274 in 2005 (IATTC 2006). Although current mortality is greatly reduced, the subspecies has not shown clear signs of recovery. Potential factors such as fishery-related stress, unobserved mortality due to calf separation and orphaning during fishing operations (Archer et al. 2001), possible mortality imposed by small vessels that do not carry observers, ecosystem changes, and under-reporting of mortality have been suggested as possible reasons for the eastern spinner’s slow recovery (Gerrodette and Forcada 2005). These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive; two or more be operating in combination to prevent rapid recovery of the population. However, in any case the cause is not understood. If indirect effects of chase-and-capture are the root of the problem, the impact could have been increasing in recent years, because the number of net sets on dolphins in the ETP has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s to an all-time high in 2003 of 14,000 sets (U.S. Marine Mammal Commission 2006), similar to levels in the 1980s and nearly twice as high as in the 1980s.
An additional threat is bycatch in artisanal gillnet fisheries in several nations (Vidal et al. 1994, Palacios and Gerrodette 1996).
The species is listed in Appendix II of CITES.
Eastern Spinner Dolphins, as with other species impacted by the ETP tuna purse-seine fishery are managed both nationally by the coastal countries and internationally by the IATTC under a full observer scheme. The IATTC has imposed annual mortality limits by population on each purse seine and promulgated regulations regarding the safe release of dolphins (Bayliff 2001).
Archer, F., Gerrodette, T., Dizon, A., Abella, K. and Southern, S. 2001. Unobserved kill of nursing dolphin calves in a tuna purse-seine fishery. Marine Mammal Science 17(3): 540-554.
Ballance, L.T., Pitman, R.L. and Fiedler, P.C. 2006. Oceanographic influences on seabirds and cetaceans of the eastern tropical Pacific: a review. Progress in Oceanography 69: 360-390.
Barlow, J. 1984. Reproductive seasonality in pelagic dolphins (Stenella spp.): implications for measuring rates. Report of the International Whaling Commission (Special Issue) 6: 191-198.
Bayliff, W.H. 2001. Organization, functions, and achievements of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. IATTC Special Report 13.
Galván Magaña, F. 1999. Relaciones tróficas interespecíficas de la comunidad de depradadores epipelágicos del océano Pacífico orienta. Ph.D dissertation. Centro de Investigción Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada.
Gerrodette, T. and Forcada, J. 2005. Non-recovery of two spotted and spinner dolphin populations in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 291: 1-21.
Gerrodette, T., Watters, G. and Forcada, J. 2005. Preliminary estimates of 2003 dolphin abundance in the eastern tropical Pacific. Administrative Report LJ-05-05. Southwest Fisheries Science Center.
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). 2006. 2004 Annual Report.
IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2012.2). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 17 October 2012).
Palacios, D.M. and Gerrodette, T. 1996. Potential impact of artisanal gillnet fisheries on small cetacean populations in the eastern tropical Pacific. International Whaling Commission meeting document SC/48/SM36.
Perrin, W.F. 1990. Subspecies of Stenella longirostris (Mammalia Cetacea Delphinidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 103: 453-463.
Perrin, W.F., Akin P.A. and Kashiwada, J.V. 1991. Geographic variation in external morphology of the spinner dolphin Stenella longirostris in the eastern Pacific and implications for conservation. Fishery Bulletin 89: 411-428.
Perrin, W. F., Evans, W. E. and Holts, D.B. 1979. Movements of pelagic dolphins (Stenella spp.) in the eastern tropical Pacific as indicated by results of tagging, with summary of tagging operations, 1969-76. NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-737.
Perrin, W.F., Warner, R.R., Fiscus, C.H. and Holts, D.B. 1973. Stomach contents of porpoise, Stenella spp., and yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, in mixed-species aggregations. Fishery Bulletin 71: 1077-1092.
Perryman, W.L. and Westlake, R.L. 1998. A new geographic form of the spinner dolphin, Stenella longirostris, detected with aerial photogrammetry. Marine Mammal Science 14: 38—50.
Reilly, S.B., Donaghue, M.A., Gerrodette, T., Wade, P., Balance, L., Fiedler, P., Dizon, A., Perryman, W., Archer, F.A. and Edwards, E.F. 2005. Report of the scientific research program under the International Dolphin Conservation Program Act. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum NMFS NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-372.
Taylor, B.L., Chivers, S.J., Larese, J. and Perrin, W. 2007. Generation Length and Percent Mature Estimates for IUCN Assessments of Cetaceans. Administrative report LJ-07-01 available from Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Dr., La Jolla, CA 92038, USA.
U.S. Marine Mammal Commission. 2006. Annual Report to Congress 2005.
Vidal, O., Van Waerebeek, K. and Findley, L.T. 1994. Cetaceans and gillnet fisheries in Mexico, Central America and the wider Caribbean: a preliminary review. Report of the International Whaling Commission (Special Issue) 15: 221–233.
Wade, P.R., Watters, G.M., Gerrodette, T. and Reilly, S.B. 2007. Depletion of spotted and spinner dolphins in the eastern tropical Pacific: modeling hypotheses for their lack of recovery. Marine Ecology Progress Series 343: 1-14.
|Citation:||Hammond, P.S., Bearzi, G., Bjørge, A., Forney, K.A., Karkzmarski, L., Kasuya, T., Perrin, W.F., Scott, M.D., Wang, J.Y. , Wells, R.S. & Wilson, B. 2012. Stenella longirostris ssp. orientalis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 26 November 2014.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|