







| Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIMALIA | CHORDATA | AVES | CORACIIFORMES | BUCEROTIDAE |
| Scientific Name: | Rhinoplax vigil | ||||||
| Species Authority: | (Forster, 1781) | ||||||
Common Name/s:
|
|||||||
| Taxonomic Notes: | Use of the genus Rhinoplax follows BirdLife International (2001). | ||||||
| Red List Category & Criteria: | Near Threatened ver 3.1 | ||||||
| Year Published: | 2012 | ||||||
| Assessor/s: | BirdLife International | ||||||
| Reviewer/s: | Butchart, S. & Symes, A. | ||||||
| Contributor/s: | |||||||
|
Justification: This forest-dependent species is likely to be declining moderately rapidly throughout its range as a result of habitat loss and hunting pressure. It is considered Near Threatened, and should be carefully monitored in case of future increases in the rate of decline. |
|||||||
| History: |
|
||||||
| Range Description: | Rhinoplax vigil is confined to the Sundaic lowlands, where it is known from south Tenasserim, Myanmar, peninsular Thailand, Sabah, Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Kalimantan and Sumatra, Indonesia and Brunei (BirdLife International 2001). It is generally scarce and occurs at low densities even in optimal habitat. |
| Countries: |
Native: Brunei Darussalam; Indonesia; Malaysia; Myanmar; ThailandRegionally extinct: Singapore |
| Range Map: | Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. |
| Population: | The population size of this species has not been quantified; it is considered locally common. |
| Population Trend: |
Decreasing
|
| Habitat and Ecology: | It occurs in primary semi-evergreen and evergreen lowland forest, up to 1,500 m. In particular, it prefers rugged terrain, especially in foothills, and can persist locally in selectively logged forest. |
| Systems: | Terrestrial |
| Major Threat(s): | Rates of forest loss in the Sundaic lowlands have been extremely rapid, owing partly to the escalation of illegal logging and land conversion, with deliberate targeting of all remaining stands of valuable timber including those inside protected areas. Forest fires have also had a damaging effect (particularly in 1997-1998). The magnitude of these threats may be allayed by this species's tolerance of hill forest, which is under less pressure from logging and agricultural conversion. It is prized by hunters, although centuries of hunting have meant that it is very shy and wary, and therefore capture rates may be relatively low. |
| Conservation Actions: |
Conservation Actions Underway CITES I listed. Conservation Actions Proposed Monitor populations across the species's range to determine the magnitude of declines and rates of range contraction. Monitor the impact of hunting pressure on populations. Campaign for the protection of remaining tracts of lowland forest throughout the range. |
|
BirdLife International. 2001. Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International Red Data Book. BirdLife International, Cambridge, U.K. del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J. 2001. Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 6: Mousebirds to Hornbills. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2012.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 19 June 2012). |
| Citation: | BirdLife International 2012. Rhinoplax vigil. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 23 May 2013. |
| Disclaimer: | To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>. |
| Feedback: | If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided |