Acrocephalus brevipennis 

Scope: Global
Language: English
Status_ne_offStatus_dd_offStatus_lc_offStatus_nt_offStatus_vu_offStatus_en_onStatus_cr_offStatus_ew_offStatus_ex_off

Translate page into:

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Passeriformes Acrocephalidae

Scientific Name: Acrocephalus brevipennis
Species Authority: (Keulemans, 1866)
Common Name(s):
English Cape Verde Swamp-warbler, Cape Verde Swamp-Warbler, Cape Verde Cane Warbler, Cape Verde Islands Cane Warbler, Cape Verde Warbler
French Rousserolle des Iles du Cap-Vert
Taxonomic Source(s): del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Identification information: 14-16 cm. Medium-sized warbler. Dun-brown above with warm buff belly and flanks and creamy throat and breast. Long, pointed bill, black legs and toes. Sexes similar. Voice Loud, explosive song with clear whistles and blurred churring heard throughout the year, but most intense between August and November. Hints Small parties sometimes feed communally in fruiting fig trees Ficus spp., together with Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla (Hazevoet 1995).

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Endangered B1ab(i,ii,iii) ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: 2016-10-01
Assessor(s): BirdLife International
Reviewer(s): Butchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor(s): Hazevoet, C., Hering, H., Hering, J., Batalha, H. & Donald, P.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Ekstrom, J., Shutes, S., Symes, A., Taylor, J. & Westrip, J.
Justification:
This species is confined to three small islands where, despite its adaptation to artificial habitats, its population is suspected to be declining as a result of successive droughts and an increasing human population. Its future on one island, in particular, is precarious. It is therefore classified as Endangered. The discovery of a relatively large population on Fogo, where it occurs commonly in plantations and crops, suggests that it may be less threatened than was previously feared, and if it is no longer considered to be undergoing continuing declines it may be eligible for downlisting in the future.

Previously published Red List assessments:

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:Acrocephalus brevipennis was once believed to be confined to Santiago, Cape Verde Islands, where it was though to be locally distributed. It has most likely died out on Brava (no records since 1969 and formerly scarce) and was believed to have died out on São Nicolau (where it was formerly numerous). However, a previously unreported specimen collected on São Nicolau in October 1970 was discovered in the collection of the Centro de Zoologia, Lisbon, providing the impetus for a thorough search of the island (Hazevoet 1999a) and, in 1998, surveys located eight territories confined to the north-west of the island (though its long-term prospects for survival here are poor) (Hazevoet et al. 1999). In October 2004 a population was discovered on Fogo, and it has since been found to be widespread across the northern half of the island between 200-975 m, with the total population on the island conservatively estimated at 500 pairs (Hering and Hering 2005, Hering and Fuchs 2009). In addition, the species may have formerly occurred on Santo Antão (Hazevoet 1995). On Santiago, the species was recently reported from Tarrafal, far to the north of the species's known range (C.J. Hazevoet in litt. 2007). The total population was estimated at c.500 pairs in the early 1990s (Hazevoet 1995), and thought to number 1,000-1,500 birds based on its known range in 2007 (C.J. Hazevoet in litt. 2007). However the discovery of relatively large numbers on Fogo means that the total is probably considerably higher.

Surveys to detect this species were carried out in 2013, 2014 and 2016 in a joint project between the University of East Anglia, UK, and Cape Verde Natural Parks of Fogo (Fogo), Serra Malagueta (Santiago) and Monte Gordo (S. Nicolau). Currently, the bird is known to be absent from Brava and Santo Antão; anectodal reports could not be verified despite extensive searches and could have consisted of vagrant birds (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). On Fogo, it can be found in densely vegetated areas between 299 and 1384m, including coffee plantations, inaccessible ravines covered in invasive Lantana camara and Furcrarea spp., and the forest of Monte Velha (Batalha et al. unpublished data). On Santiago, it can be found in densely vegetated areas across the island, between 6 and 1039m, and in various kinds of habitats, from lowland plantations (e.g., Praia, Cidade Velha, Chão Bom, Achada Tenda, Pedra Babejo) to mountain forests (Serra Malagueta and Monte Tchota), and from sugar cane plantations in Praia to Prosopis spp. shrub thickets in Tarrafal (Batalha et al. unpublished data). On S. Nicolau, however, territories seem to be confined to a central humid area comprising part of the Natural Park of Monte Gordo and the valleys of Queimadas, Fragata and Covoada, between 162 and 733m (Batalha et al. unpublished data). Extensive, thorough surveys located only 12-13 confirmed territories, either in reed patches or mango trees, so the actual number is not likely to be higher than 20-30 in the entire island of S. Nicolau (Batalha et al. unpublished data). The bird is not present either in the forest of Monte Gordo, on the plantations of Fajã or in the far-east Prosopis spp. thicket of Carriçal (Batalha et al. unpublished data). Genetic data confirm that there have been no recent colonisations or re-colonisations of either of the islands (Batalha et al. unpublished data).

Countries occurrence:
Native:
Cape Verde
Additional data:
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO):Yes
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO):NoEstimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2:1300
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO):YesExtreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO):No
Number of Locations:3Continuing decline in number of locations:No
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations:No
Upper elevation limit (metres):1384
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:The population was estimated at c.500 pairs in the early 1990s, and was thought to number 1,000-1,500 birds based on its known range in 2007 (C. J. Hazevoet in litt. 2007). However, conservative estimates of 500 pairs on Fogo mean that the total population is likely to be higher, likely numbering 1,500-2,000 mature individuals, roughly equivalent to 2,200-3,000 individuals in total. However, full censuses were never carried on Fogo or Santiago. The numbers on Santiago could be higher than previously thought because the bird is now known to occur in all vegetated areas of the island, whereas in the 1990s it was thought to be absent from the north of the island (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). On Fogo, a volcanic eruption in 2014 does not seem to have affected the extent of area occupied by the bird, but the bird is absent of areas where it had been previously found on the forest of Monte Velha following the forest fire of 2015. However, the size of the birds’ territories is unknown, and could be larger than in closely related species; this means that the numbers estimated based on replies to playbacks may or may not correspond to the actual numbers (in recent surveys, the same colour-ringed bird replied to playback lures from locations that could have considered two adjacent territories [H. Batalha in litt. 2016]). Surveys on S. Nicolau in three occasions in 2014 and 2016 found 12 – 13 territories each time, and the real number is not likely to be much higher. There are probably a minimum of 20 birds and a maximum of 50 on that island.

Trend Justification:  Despite the discovery of a large population on Fogo in 2004 and a report from Tarrafal on Santiago, the overall population was suspected to be declining owing to habitat loss, although substantive evidence of this is lacking (C.J. Hazevoet in litt. 2007). The Fogo population favours coffee plantations and introduced crops and the population may yet prove to be stable.

While the population on S. Nicolau seems to have decreased between the time of its discovery, in the 1860s, and the 1920s, the numbers seem to have stabilised, with approximately the same numbers of birds were found in 1998, 2004, 2014 and 2016 (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). On Santiago, the bird was considered to be absent from the northern part of the island in the 1980s and 1990s, but currently it can be found in all latitudes; it is not clear whether the birds was really absent of the northern part of the island in the 1980s/1990s or was simply undetected, so current population trends are difficult to infer (H. Batalha in litt. 2016), and it possible that the species may have as much as doubled in population size (C. Hazevoet in litt. 2012).
Current Population Trend:Unknown
Additional data:
Number of mature individuals:1500-2000Continuing decline of mature individuals:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations:NoPopulation severely fragmented:No
No. of subpopulations:3Continuing decline in subpopulations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations:NoAll individuals in one subpopulation:No

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:Its original habitat was probably scrub on mountain slopes and reedbeds in valleys (Hazevoet 1993). It is now found in a broad range of habitats up to 1384 m (H. Batalha  in litt. 2016). The habitats occupied at lower elevations include well-vegetated valleys (especially with patches of reeds), reedbeds, woodland, agricultural areas, and gardens in villages and small towns, notably near running water (Hazevoet 1995). In 2004, a population in the interior of Santiago was noted inhabiting Eucalyptus forest with dense, bushy undergrowth at 800-1000 m (J. Hering and H. Hering in litt. 2004). On São Nicolau, it inhabits small, dense stands of cane Arundo donax along dry riverbeds, often with shrubs and fruit trees (Hazevoet et al. 1999). On Fogo, it inhabits coffee plantations with scattered fruit trees and maize fields with coffee bushes in areas characterised by narrow, shrub-filled ravines at 490-950 m, and the forest of Mount Velha (Hering and Hering 2005, Hering and Fuchs 2009, H. Batalha in litt. 2016). It may also in habit cultivated areas around dams (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). It breeds mainly in August-November, but the breeding season may be extended in response to local rainfall (Hazevoet 1995).

Systems:Terrestrial; Freshwater
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:Yes
Generation Length (years):4.4
Movement patterns:Not a Migrant

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Habitat loss due to the combined effects of successive droughts and an increasing human population may be responsible for the population decline and restriction of its distribution on Santiago (C.J. Hazevoet in litt. 2000). This is almost certainly the cause of its decline on São Nicolau and extinction from Brava, where continuing desiccation has restricted agricultural productivity (Hazevoet 1993). In addition, disease and enviromental catastrophies are potential threats to these island populations (Hazevoet et al. 1999). A recent forest fire on Fogo destroyed a large part of inaccessible forest where the species possibly existed (H. Batalha in litt. 2016), and so forest fires, and any future increase in their frequency could be very harmful to this species. The removal of invasive plant species, such as reed removal by farmers on S. Nicolau, could possibly reduce the available habitat for this species in areas where there is no natural habitat (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). There is suspicion that it may be predated by birds (e.g. kestrel, crows), possibly rates and even humans (H. Batalha in litt. 2016).

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Conservation Actions Underway
Wildlife Protection Laws, proposed in the late 1980s, have still not materialised and, as of 2007, the species still has no legal protection (C.J. Hazevoet in litt. 2007). It is found in three protected areas: Parque Natural do Fogo, Parque Natural da Serra Malagueta and Parque Natural de Monte Gordo. It is considered a CITES species by national authorities, and any work conducted in the natural parks is subjected to permission by the local authorities. There is regular monitoring on Natural Parks of Fogo and Serra Malagueta, and on S. Jorge dos Órgãos. There is also a monitoring scheme in place at Natural Park of Monte Gordo, but it has been irregular over the last few years due to the lack of specialised staff (H. Batalha in litt. 2016).

Conservation Actions Proposed
Encourage local farmers on São Nicolau to plant stands of A. donax cane amongst their fruit trees, by means of agricultural subsidies, to increase the area of available habitat (however, this would be extremely difficult to implement) (Hazevoet et al. 1999). Carry out large-scale and long-term education and information programmes, directed at both the local authorities and general public (Hazevoet 1999b); especially programmes targeting children and farmers, which are the sectors of the population which are most in contact with this bird (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Carry out directed censuses on Santiago, Fogo and S. Nicolau, to better assess current population numbers. Investigate what threats it faces (Hering and Hering 2005); especially investigate predation threats, diseases, pathogens and parasites, and the possibility of occurrence of inbreeding depression. Conduct research into possible conservation actions (Hering and Hering 2005), and investigate the possibility/benefit of using genetic restoration to increase number of birds and genetic diversity on the population of S. Nicolau (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Focus research efforts on the recently discovered population on Fogo (Hering and Hering 2005), and build partnerships with Cape Verdean Universities, especially the branches of Santiago, to better study this species (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Research could include studying diet requirements, breeding behaviour, age at first breeding, breeding success, fledging success, recruitment, adult survival and other basic biological parameters; assess the bird’s adaptation to human-altered habitats; and further research into the species's habitat requirements (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). This may involve investigating the species’s association with dams, which are currently being built on several locations on Santiago, and its association with invasive plant species (e.g., Lantana, Furcrarea, Arundo, Prosopis spp.); which should be considered when planning conservation actions aimed at eradicating invasive species (as previously done on Natural Park of Serra Malagueta) (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Assess the benefits of a monitoring ringing plan, especially on the subpopulations that live within the limits of Natural Parks of Fogo, Serra Malagueta and Monte Gordo (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Ensure regular monitoring of the population on S. Nicolau and investigate the extent of local adaptation in all populations (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Consider expanding the limits of the Natural Park of Monte Gordo to include part of the valley of Canto Fajã, where the bird lives in reed patches which are currently regularly cut by local farmers (in a way that would preserve the livelihood of local farmers as well), and work together with farmers and local people to increase local agriculture, which would benefit both the bird and the people (H. Batalha in litt. 2016). Work together to exchange scientific knowledge and increase conservation capacity of national and local stakeholders (H. Batalha in litt. 2016).

Classifications [top]

1. Forest -> 1.5. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
3. Shrubland -> 3.5. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
3. Shrubland -> 3.6. Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
5. Wetlands (inland) -> 5.4. Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
14. Artificial/Terrestrial -> 14.1. Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
14. Artificial/Terrestrial -> 14.3. Artificial/Terrestrial - Plantations
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
14. Artificial/Terrestrial -> 14.4. Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
14. Artificial/Terrestrial -> 14.5. Artificial/Terrestrial - Urban Areas
suitability:Suitable season:resident major importance:No
2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management
4. Education & awareness -> 4.3. Awareness & communications

In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning
  Action Recovery plan:No
  Systematic monitoring scheme:Yes
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
  Conservation sites identified:Yes, over entire range
  Occur in at least one PA:Yes
  Invasive species control or prevention:No
In-Place Species Management
  Successfully reintroduced or introduced beningly:No
  Subject to ex-situ conservation:No
In-Place Education
  Subject to recent education and awareness programmes:No
  Included in international legislation:No
  Subject to any international management/trade controls:No
1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1. Housing & urban areas
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1. Housing & urban areas
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines  
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.2. Droughts
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines  
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.2. Droughts
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Majority (50-90%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines ⇒ Impact score:Medium Impact: 6 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.4. Storms & flooding
♦ timing:Future ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.4. Storms & flooding
♦ timing:Future ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines  
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.3. Indirect species effects -> 2.3.7. Reduced reproductive success

12. Other options -> 12.1. Other threat
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 5 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation

7. Natural system modifications -> 7.1. Fire & fire suppression -> 7.1.1. Increase in fire frequency/intensity
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Rapid Declines ⇒ Impact score:Medium Impact: 6 
→ Stresses
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
  • 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.1. Unspecified species
♦ timing:Future ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines  
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.1. Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.1. Unspecified species
♦ timing:Future ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Slow, Significant Declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 3 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

8. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> 8.4. Problematic species/disease of unknown origin -> 8.4.1. Unspecified species
♦ timing:Ongoing ♦ scope:Minority (<50%) ♦ severity:Negligible declines ⇒ Impact score:Low Impact: 4 
→ Stresses
  • 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality

1. Research -> 1.2. Population size, distribution & trends
1. Research -> 1.3. Life history & ecology
1. Research -> 1.5. Threats
1. Research -> 1.6. Actions

Bibliography [top]

Batalha, H. unpublished. Conservation, ecology and genetics of the Cape Verde warbler Acrocephalus brevipennis: Report on fieldwork on Cape Verde, November 2013 – January 2014 .

Hazevoet, C. J. 1993. On the history and type specimens of the Cape Verde Cane Warbler Acrocephalus brevipennis (Keulemans, 1866) (Aves, Sylviidae). Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 62: 249-253.

Hazevoet, C. J. 1995. The birds of the Cape Verde Islands. British Ornithologists' Union, Tring, U.K.

Hazevoet, C. J. 1999. Notes on birds from the Cape Verde Islands in the collection of the Centro de Zoologia, Lisbon with comments on taxonomy and distribution. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 119: 25-31.

Hazevoet, C. J.; Monteiro, L. R.; Ratcliffe, N. 1999. Rediscovery of the Cape Verde Cane Warbler Acrocephalus brevipennis on Sao Nicolau in February 1998. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 119: 68-71.

Hering, J.; Fuchs, E. 2009. The Cape Verde Warbler: distribution, density, habitat and breeding biology on the island of Fogo. British Birds: 17-24.

Hering, J.; Hering, H. 2005. Discovery of Cape Verde Warbler Acrocephalus brevipennis on Fogo, Cape Verde Islands. Bulletin of the African Bird Club 12: 147-149.

IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 07 December 2016).


Citation: BirdLife International. 2016. Acrocephalus brevipennis. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22714852A94430363. . Downloaded on 10 December 2016.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided