







| Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIMALIA | CHORDATA | AMPHIBIA | CAUDATA | PLETHODONTIDAE |
| Scientific Name: | Eurycea nana | |||
| Species Authority: | Bishop, 1941 | |||
Common Name/s:
|
||||
| Red List Category & Criteria: | Vulnerable D2 ver 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Year Published: | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assessor/s: | Geoffrey Hammerson, Paul Chippindale | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reviewer/s: | Global Amphibian Assessment Coordinating Team (Simon Stuart, Janice Chanson, Neil Cox and Bruce Young) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contributor/s: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Justification: Listed as Vulnerable because it is known from only a single location. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| History: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Range Description: | This species is known only from a pool at the source of the San Marcos River (San Marcos Springs, Spring Lake), Hays County, Texas, United States, and a short distance downstream (Chippindale et al. 2000). A second, smaller population of this species was thought to occur in the Comal River (Springs), slightly to the west in Comal County; however, this population recently was determined not to be E. nana (Chippindale, Hillis and Price 1994, Chippindale, Price and Hillis 1998, Chippindale et al. 2000). |
| Countries: | Native: United States |
| Range Map: | Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. |
| Population: | It is abundant within its limited range, where the population is stable. Population densities were estimated to be about 116-129 individuals per m² in vegetation mats (Tupa and Davis 1976; Nelson 1993). The entire population has been estimated as about 53,200 individuals in vegetation mats and suitable rocky substrates (USFWS 1996). |
| Population Trend: |
Stable
|
| Habitat and Ecology: | It can be found in shallow alkaline springs carved out of limestone. They have been found in mats of blue-green algae (Lyngbya sp.), under rocks, and in gravel substrate at water depths of less than 1m to several metres. The species is completely aquatic and does not metamorphose. Eggs have never been observed in the wild. In captivity, ovipositioning has occurred on aquatic moss, filamentous algae, rocks, and glass marbles. |
| Systems: | Freshwater |
| Major Threat(s): | It is vulnerable to alterations in water level and water quality that may result from agricultural and residential development. |
| Conservation Actions: | Its range is protected at both the state and federal level. It is listed as Threatened by the state of Texas and Threatened by the Federal government. There is a need for close monitoring of the population status of this species. |
| Citation: | Geoffrey Hammerson, Paul Chippindale 2004. Eurycea nana. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 25 May 2013. |
| Disclaimer: | To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>. |
| Feedback: | If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided |