Map_thumbnail_large_font

Acrocephalus rimitarae 

Scope: Global
Language: English
Status_ne_offStatus_dd_offStatus_lc_offStatus_nt_offStatus_vu_offStatus_en_offStatus_cr_onStatus_ew_offStatus_ex_off

Translate page into:

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Passeriformes Acrocephalidae

Scientific Name: Acrocephalus rimitarae (Murphy & Mathews, 1929)
Common Name(s):
English Rimatara Reed-warbler, Rimatara Reed-Warbler
Synonym(s):
Acrocephalus rimatarae (Murphy & Mathews, 1929) [orth. error]
Taxonomic Source(s): del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Taxonomic Notes:

Acrocephalus rimitarae (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as A. rimatarae.

Identification information: 17 cm. Large warbler with relatively short bill. Adult olive-brown above, yellowish-white below, with dark streak through eye and pale supercilium. White feathers variably and often asymmetrically scattered among darker feathers, often producing large blotches. Voice Loud chack-chack or high-pitched chirp. No song reported.

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered B1ab(iii,v) ver 3.1
Year Published: 2017
Date Assessed: 2017-10-01
Assessor(s): BirdLife International
Reviewer(s): Symes, A.
Contributor(s): Dutson, G., Millett, J. & Raust, P.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Derhé, M., Mahood, S., O'Brien, A., Pilgrim, J., Shutes, S., Stattersfield, A., Wheatley, H.
Justification:
This species is listed as Critically Endangered because it has an extremely small range on one island and is considered to be undergoing a decline as a result of habitat destruction and invasive species.

Previously published Red List assessments:

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:Acrocephalus rimatarae is endemic to Rimatara in the Austral Islands, French Polynesia. In 1989, it was found to be common and widespread at lower elevations (Seitre and Seitre 1991), and in 2004 population density was estimated at just over 3 birds per hectare in good habitat (Thibault and Cibois 2006). Population estimates vary widely depending on the methods used: the most recent estimate was 1,780-2,781 individuals (C. Blanvillain in litt. 2017), but other estimates have been much lower: 740 (2002) or 675 (2004) (Thibault and Cibois 2006). Recent observers consider it to be abundant over much of the island (P. Raust in litt. 2012; C. Blanvillain in litt. 2016 per G. Dutson in litt. 2016).

Countries occurrence:
Native:
French Polynesia
Additional data:
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO):Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO):NoEstimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2:7
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO):UnknownExtreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO):No
Number of Locations:1Continuing decline in number of locations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations:No
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:Various population estimates have been made which differ widely depending on methods used. Point count observations in 2002 gave a population estimate of 5,000 birds (Blanvillain 2002). Territory mapping techniques used by Thibault and Cibois (2006a) gave estimates of 1,777-2,567 breeding birds in 2004 (roughly 2,665-3,850 individuals), and transects gave estimates of 740 (Raust and Sanford 2002), 675 (Gouini 2004) and 670 (Albar et al. 2009), though applying a correction to account for differences in methodology would lead to higher estimates from these (Blanvillain et al. 2015). The most recent estimate generated is 1,780-2,781 individuals (C. Blanvillain in litt. 2017). Taking into account corrections (see Blanvillain et al. 2015), the range of estimates fall into the range of approximately 900-3,850 individuals, which roughly equates to 600-2,600 mature individuals (G. Dutson in litt. 2016).

Trend Justification:  Given the threats the species may be facing, and the continuing degradation of its habitat, it is considered to be undergoing a slow ongoing decline (C. Blanvillain in litt. 2016 per G. Dutson in litt. 2016). Population estimates made using similar methodologies in 2006 and 2017 suggest a reduction (Thibault and Cibois 2006a; C. Blanvillain in litt. 2017).
Current Population Trend:Decreasing
Additional data:
Number of mature individuals:600-2600Continuing decline of mature individuals:Yes
Extreme fluctuations:NoPopulation severely fragmented:No
No. of subpopulations:1Continuing decline in subpopulations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations:NoAll individuals in one subpopulation:Yes
No. of individuals in largest subpopulation:100

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:The species is found throughout the island, even in swamps and the central fern-covered hills (Thibault and Cibois 2006a,b). Breeding however mainly occurs in wooded areas such as the undergrowth of coconut groves, mixed horticulture, coastal forests and natural forest on limestone substrates (Thibault and Cibois 2006a,b).

Systems:Terrestrial; Freshwater
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:Yes
Generation Length (years):4.4
Movement patterns:Not a Migrant

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Since the species requires forest for nesting, habitat destruction is a concern; the recent construction of an airport destroyed over a third of remaining native forest (Thibault and Cibois 2006) and it was extended in 2015 (Blanvillain et al. 2015), although (after the initial build at least) suitable breeding habitat remains (J. Millett in litt. 2007). Feral cats are likely to cause some mortality (Thibault and Cibois 2006a,b) and have become increasingly common on the island according to local people (G. Dutson in litt. 2016). The introduction of alien species, particularly Common Myna Acridotheris tristis, is a grave concern given the species's very small range and the declines it has caused in populations of other Pacific Acrocephalus species (Thibault and Cibois 2006a,b). Polynesian rat Rattus exulans and brown rat R. norvegicus are present on the island, but not black rat R. rattus (McCormack and Künzle 1996, P. Raust in litt. 2012), implicated in the decline and extinction of many birds on oceanic islands; its arrival might be a cause for concern, although other Pacific Acrocephalus species coexist with it (Seitre and Seitre 1991).

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Conservation Actions Underway
A population survey and assessment of the threats have been conducted (Thibault and Cibois 2006a,b). Biosecurity measures to prevent the introduction of black rats R. rattus to Rimatara are in place at the wharf, managed by the agriculture officer with support from SOP Manu.

Conservation Actions Proposed
Continue regular monitoring of the population to assess trends. Implement a programme to ensure that R. rattus and A. tristis are not accidentally introduced (McCormack and Künzle 1996). Set aside an area of native habitat for protection. Consider controlling feral cats in breeding habitat.


Citation: BirdLife International. 2017. Acrocephalus rimitarae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22714826A118845579. . Downloaded on 22 July 2018.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided