Mimus graysoni 

Scope: Global
Language: English

Translate page into:

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Passeriformes Mimidae

Scientific Name: Mimus graysoni (Lawrence, 1871)
Common Name(s):
English Socorro Mockingbird, Socorro Thrasher
Harporhynchus graysoni Lawrence, 1871
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — Stotz et al. (1996)
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — Collar and Andrew (1988)
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — BirdLife International (2000)
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — BirdLife International (2004)
Mimodes graysoni (Lawrence, 1871) — Collar et al. (1994)
Taxonomic Source(s): del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Identification information: 25 cm. Largish, mostly plain brown passerine. Brown upperparts, darker wings with two narrow, white wing-bars and darker tail. Brown head with dusky lores and short, pale supercilium. Whitish underparts, streaked brown on flanks. Blackish bill and legs. Similar spp. Northern Mockingbird M. polyglottos is greyer with white wing-patches and outer rectrices. Voice Grating warble song. Loud whichoo call. M. polyglottos and M. graysoni mimic each other.

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered B1ab(ii,iii) ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: 2016-10-01
Assessor(s): BirdLife International
Reviewer(s): Butchart, S. & Symes, A.
Contributor(s): Keitt, B., Martínez-Gómez, J.E. & Tershy, B.
Facilitator/Compiler(s): Bird, J., Butchart, S., Capper, D., Isherwood, I., Pople, R., Sharpe, C.J., Symes, A., Temple, H., Ashpole, J
Intensive sheep-grazing and a persistent locust swarm are reducing and degrading habitat for this species. Combined with cat predation, which effectively removes mockingbirds from areas with little or no understorey, declines in its very small population and extremely small range are considered likely. Despite sheep eradication and ongoing cat eradication the species has not yet expanded its range. This combination of factors qualifies the species as Critically Endangered.

Previously published Red List assessments:

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description:This species is endemic to Socorro in the Revillagigedo Islands, Mexico. It was the most abundant and widespread landbird in 1925, and was still abundant in 1958. By 1978, it had declined dramatically and was feared on the verge of extinction. Subsequent surveys have estimated the population at 50-200 pairs in 1988-1990 (Castellanos and Rodríguez-Estrella 1993, Wehtje et al. 1993, Rodríguez-Estrella et al. 1996) and c.350 individuals in 1993-1994, with the highest densities in the sheep-free dwarf forests of Cerro Evermann (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996). Of 170 birds ringed in 1994, 56% were subadults (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996), suggesting that productivity is high and the population would be capable of increasing if habitat quality improves across the island (J. E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2007). However despite sheep eradication on Socorro (Ortíz-Alcaraz et al. 2016) and ongoing feral cat eradication efforts the species has so far failed to expand its range (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016).

Countries occurrence:
Additional data:
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO):Yes
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO):NoEstimated extent of occurrence (EOO) - km2:50
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO):UnknownExtreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO):No
Number of Locations:1Continuing decline in number of locations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations:NoLower elevation limit (metres):300
Upper elevation limit (metres):950
Range Map:Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population:Martinez-Gomez & Curry 1996 calculated a total population of 353 (287-419) individuals based upon comprehensive ringing data. Visits by the author to the same sites during 2006 & 2007 reported a similar population. The estimate is best applied to the area of the island where ringing took place. This implies that the total population of the island may be larger (J. E. Martinez-Gomez in litt. 2007). This roughly equates to 190-280 mature individuals.

Trend Justification:  Largely owing to ongoing control of sheep on the island, the population appears to have stabilised; however productivity may be more severely impacted by the locust swarm in some years. The species has yet to expand its range following sheep eradication and ongoing feral cat eradication efforts (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016). Juveniles have moved into disturbed areas in the south-east of Socorro Island but failed to successfully establish breeding territories. Adult males have occasionally established themselves in these areas too but without adult females (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016).

Current Population Trend:Stable
Additional data:
Number of mature individuals:190-280Continuing decline of mature individuals:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations:NoPopulation severely fragmented:No
No. of subpopulations:1Continuing decline in subpopulations:Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations:NoAll individuals in one subpopulation:Yes
No. of individuals in largest subpopulation:100

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology:It occurs principally in moist dwarf forest and ravines with a mixture of shrubs and trees at elevations above 600 m (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996). Vegetation in these areas is dominated by the trees Ilex socorrensis, Guettarda insularis and Oreopanax xalapensis and the understorey species Triumfetta socorrensis and Eupatorium pacificum (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996, Martínez-Gómez et al. 2001). It is very rare at low and mid-elevations (0-500 m), and absent from areas of Croton masonii scrub near sea-level and sheep-damaged habitat in the south-east half of the island (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996, Martínez-Gómez et al. 2001), but is common within fig Ficus cotinifolia patches in the north-west of the island (J. E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2007). Fig groves may act as regeneration nuclei for the species, supporting birds when a suitable understorey is present (J. E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2007). Nesting may occur from November-July with a peak in March-April (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1995). Three eggs are laid and the incubation period is no more than 15 days (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1995). Food includes crab remains, small invertebrates and fruit, particularly those of Ilex socorrensis and Bumelia socorrensis (Castellanos and Rodríguez-Estrella 1993, Martínez-Gómez et al. 2001).

Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat:Yes
Generation Length (years):5.3
Movement patterns:Not a Migrant

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Sheep had intensively grazed almost one third of the island by 1990 (Castellanos and Rodríguez-Estrella 1993), leaving no suitable nesting or foraging habitat in the south of the island (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996). Predation by feral cats was initially thought responsible for the species's decline, but cats were introduced some time after 1972 (Martínez-Gómez et al. 2001), and examinations of cat stomach contents and scats have not provided any substantive evidence (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996). However, they are likely to prey upon dispersing individuals that move into areas with little or no understorey (J. E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2007). Cat eradication efforts are now underway but this work has the potential to indirectly threaten the species via construction of tracks through dense understorey vegetation (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016). Competition with the immigrant Mimus polyglottos is probably not a factor because Mimus graysoni is much larger, has different habitat preferences and is not outcompeted in undisturbed habitats (Castellanos and Rodríguez-Estrella 1993, Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996). Since 1994, c.30 ha of forest have been lost owing to a now permanent locust Schistocerca piceifrons swarm on the island which irrupts twice yearly. Its effects are thought to be more severe owing to the degradation of native vegetation by introduced grazing mammals, and the suppression of native bird populations (which typically exert top-down control of insect populations on the island) by introduced cats. Locusts cut leaves, flowers and fruit from trees and thus represent a serious threat to fruit eaters such as Socorro Mockingbird (J. E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2007). Potential developments on Socorro including enlargements to the airstrip and the possibility of a new federal prison could destroy breeding habitat and increase the risk of accidental introduction of other invasive species.

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Conservation Actions Underway
The Revillagigedo Islands were declared a Biosphere Reserve in 1994 (Rodríguez-Estrella et al. 1996). There is an ongoing control programme in the region (the Mexican navy has effectively reduced the sheep population to c. 300 heads) (B. Tershy in litt. 1999, B. Tershy and B. Keitt in litt. 1999). A programme to eradicate feral sheep from Socorro was conducted from 2009 to 2012 (Ortíz-Alcaraz et al. 2016). Cat eradication efforts are ongoing (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016). The species is included on the 'Watch List' of the State of North America's Birds as a species of high conservation concern (NABCI 2016).

Conservation Actions Proposed
Eradicate cats and sheep from Socorro (Martínez-Gómez and Curry 1996, B. Tershy in litt. 1999, B. Tershy and B. Keitt in litt. 1999). Ensure that infrastructure development for the cat eradication efforts do not negatively impact the species (J.E. Martínez-Gómez in litt. 2016). Implement a vegetation and soil restoration plan after sheep have been removed (Martínez-Gómez et al. 2001). Establish a captive-breeding population, and a research monitoring station on Socorro (Rodríguez-Estrella et al. 1996). Monitor the population, especially before and after eradication efforts.

Citation: BirdLife International. 2016. Mimus graysoni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22711084A94277078. . Downloaded on 20 April 2018.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided