|Scientific Name:||Etheostoma sanguifluum (Cope, 1870)|
Poecilichthys sanguifluus Cope, 1870
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Smith, K. & Darwall, W.R.T.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Hammerson, G.A. & Ormes, M.|
Somewhat small extent of occurrence, but listed as Least Concern in view of the fairly large number of subpopulations, lack of evidence of a substantial decline, and apparent lack of major threats.
|Range Description:||Range includes the middle Cumberland River drainage, from Caney Fork, Tennessee, to Rockcastle River, Kentucky (Page and Burr 2011). See Etnier and Williams (1989) for spot map.|
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||This species is represented by a fairly large number of occurrences (subpopulations).|
Total adult population size is unknown. This darter is generally uncommon (Page and Burr 2011).
Trend over the past 10 years or three generations is uncertain but likely relatively stable.
|Current Population Trend:||Stable|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Habitat includes fast riffles over coarse gravel and rubble in small to medium rivers (Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 2011). Eggs are laid probably on the undersides of stones near riffles (Page 1983).|
|Movement patterns:||Not a Migrant|
|Major Threat(s):||No major threats are known.|
|Conservation Actions:||Currently, this species is of relatively low conservation concern and does not require significant additional protection or major management, monitoring, or research action.|
|Citation:||NatureServe. 2013. Etheostoma sanguifluum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T202529A18234676.Downloaded on 20 April 2018.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|