|Scientific Name:||Etheostoma asprigene|
|Species Authority:||(Forbes, 1878)|
Poecilichthys asprigenis Forbes, 1878
|Red List Category & Criteria:||Least Concern ver 3.1|
|Reviewer(s):||Smith, K. & Darwall, W.R.T.|
|Facilitator/Compiler(s):||Hammerson, G.A. & Ormes, M.|
This species is listed as Least Concern because extent of occurrence, number of subpopulations, and population size are relatively large, and because the species probably is not declining fast enough to qualify for any of the threatened categories.
|Range Description:||Range includes Mississippi River basin lowlands from Louisiana and eastern Texas to Wisconsin and Minnesota; also the Gulf Slope in the Sabine-Neches drainage in Texas and Louisiana (Page and Burr 2011).|
|Range Map:||Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.|
|Population:||This species is represented by a large number of occurrences (subpopulations).|
Total adult population size is unknown but apparently large (probably greater than 100,000). This species is locally common in Arkansas (Robison and Buchanan 1988).
Smith (1979) indicated this this species has been decimated over most of Illinois. Ross (2001) reported that recent efforts to collect this darter in Mississippi generally have been unsuccessful.
Trend over the past 10 years or three generations is uncertain, but distribution and abundance probably are slowly declining.
|Current Population Trend:||Decreasing|
|Habitat and Ecology:||Habitat includes sloughs, bottomland lakes, and low-gradient small to large rivers; in areas of sluggish to moderate current with substrates of mud, sand, and detritus; sluggish riffles over rocks or debris; persists in reservoirs in mouths of tributaries; also found in pools of clear streams (Smith 1979, Lee et al. 1980, Page and Burr 2011).|
|Movement patterns:||Not a Migrant|
|Use and Trade:||This species is not utilized.|
|Major Threat(s):||This species is at least moderately tolerant of silt and turbidity (Robison and Buchanan 1988) and organic matter (Smith 1979). Smith (1979) speculated that the decline of this species in Illinois "must be due to the presently smaller sizes of streams during drought periods."|
|Conservation Actions:||Currently, this species is of relatively low conservation concern and does not require significant additional protection or major management, monitoring, or research action.|
|Citation:||NatureServe. 2013. Etheostoma asprigene. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T202445A15362131.Downloaded on 25 September 2016.|
|Feedback:||If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided|