Map_thumbnail_large_font

Chiloglanis emarginatus

Status_ne_offStatus_dd_offStatus_lc_onStatus_nt_offStatus_vu_offStatus_en_offStatus_cr_offStatus_ew_offStatus_ex_off
 

Taxonomy [top]

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
ANIMALIA CHORDATA ACTINOPTERYGII SILURIFORMES MOCHOKIDAE

Scientific Name: Chiloglanis emarginatus
Species Authority: Jubb & Le Roux, 1969
Common Name/s:
English Phongolo Catlet, Phongolo Suckermouth
Taxonomic Notes: Zimbabwean (Pungwe and Zambezi) records are considered as incorrect identifications.

Assessment Information [top]

Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern     ver 3.1
Year Published: 2007
Assessor/s: Engelbrecht, J., Bills, R. & Cambray, J.
Reviewer/s: Snoeks, J. (Freshwater Fish Red List Authority) & Darwall, W. (Freshwater Biodiversity Assessment Unit)
Justification:
Widespread although not abundant from the Phongolo River north to the Incomati River. Despite varied impacts recent surveys in Swaziland indicate it is possibly more common there than in South African rivers.

Geographic Range [top]

Range Description: Listed in Skelton (2001) as occurring as two distinct populations. The southern population occurs in the Incomati and Phongolo Rivers in South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga) and Swaziland. The northern population occurs around the Pungwe and lower Zambezi Rivers. These two populations are considered as two distinct species here. Chiloglanis emarginatus was described from the Incomati system near Carolina and so the Southern population is assessed as this species.
Countries:
Native:
South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga); Swaziland
Presence uncertain:
Mozambique
Range Map: Click here to open the map viewer and explore range.

Population [top]

Population Trend: Unknown

Habitat and Ecology [top]

Habitat and Ecology: Occurs in larger streams and rivers over cobbles and rocks in deeper water compared to C. anoterus and C. pretoriae.
Systems: Freshwater

Threats [top]

Major Threat(s): Habitat degradation from water extraction, regular flows from dams, sedimentation from agro-forestry activities. Extinct from its type locality, the Lekkerloop stream, due to excessive water extraction by farmers during the dry season.

Conservation Actions [top]

Conservation Actions: Habitat improvement is needed over a broad area of Mpumalanga and Swaziland. Improved farming and forestry practices should be encouraged. Perhaps this could be achieved by conservancy agreements with riparian owners and conservation authorities.

Bibliography [top]

Bills, I.R., Boycott, R.C., Fakudze, M., Khumalo, N., Msibi, J., Scott, L.E.P., Terry, S. and Tweddle, D. 2004. Fish and Fisheries of Swaziland (2002-2003). Final report: July 2004. SAIAB Investigational Report. SAIAB, Grahamstown.

IUCN. 2007. 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 12th September 2007).

Skelton, P.H. 2001. A Complete Guide to the Freshwater Fishes of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town, South Africa.

Citation: Engelbrecht, J., Bills, R. & Cambray, J. 2007. Chiloglanis emarginatus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 25 May 2012.
Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>.
Feedback: If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided