| Taxonomic Notes: |
The genus Barbus (Cyprinidae) is restricted to a small number of species mainly inhabiting the European ichthyographic region including Northeast Africa. Most of the African species that are currently included in the genus, taxonomically do not appear to be closely related to the genus Barbus sensu strictu. However, no attempts have yet been made at an adequate nomenclature of the African forms. We therefore follow Berrebi et al. (1996) and use in this paper the term ‘Barbus’ for the cyprinid fish species which were previously considered as Barbus (Seegers et al., unpublished).Previously three subspecies were recognised: Barbus altianalis altianalis Boulenger, 1900; B. altianalis eduardianus Boulenger, 1901; and B. altianalis radcliffi Boulenger, 1903. Currently, those subspecies are considered invalid (see De Vos and Thys van den Audenaerde 1990a).Also reported from Lake Victoria under several synonymous names: Labeo rueppellii Pfeffer, 1896; Barbus radcliffii Boulenger, 1903; B. lobogenys Boulenger, 1906; B. bayoni Boulenger, 1911; B. pietschmanni Lohberger, 1929; B. hollyi Lohberger, 1929; and B. altianalis radcliffii Boulenger, 1903. Records from the latter species from the Tana (see Mann, 1966; 1967) are based on misidentifications. 'Barbus' procatopus Boulenger, 1916 was originally described from "The Amala River, entering te east side of Lake baringo,". Banister (1973) stated that this species is a junior synonym of 'B.' intermedius australis. It appears however that the type locality of B. procatopus is erroneous: the Amala River is not in the Baringo area but refers to a tributary of the Mara River, Lake Victoria system, De Vos et al (work in progress) therefore pointed out that B. procatopus is a junior synonym of 'B.' altianalis. |