







| Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIMALIA | CHORDATA | AVES | Anseriformes | Anatidae |
| Scientific Name: | Dendrocygna arborea | ||||||
| Species Authority: | (Linnaeus, 1758) | ||||||
Common Name/s:
|
|||||||
| Red List Category & Criteria: | Vulnerable B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) ver 3.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Year Assessed: | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
| Assessor/s | BirdLife International | |||||||||||||||
| Evaluator/s: | Butchart, S. & Mahood, S. (BirdLife International Red List Authority) | |||||||||||||||
|
Justification: This species is listed as Vulnerable because it has a small and severely fragmented range within which it is hunted, and the area, extent and quality of remaining habitat is undergoing a continuing decline, with populations at some sites disappearing altogether. However, there is evidence that the species may now be increasing, and if this were confirmed it may qualify for downlisting to Near Threatened. |
||||||||||||||||
| History: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Population: |
Ottenwalder (1997), L.G. Sorenson in litt. (2007), L. Mugica in litt (2007) Staus (1997)
|
| Population Trend: |
Increasing
|
| Habitat and Ecology: | This secretive, non-migratory duck is crepuscular or nocturnal and generally considered site faithful, but it will wander in search of water and good habitat during periodic drought 2,9,10,12. During the day, singles, pairs or flocks (up to 100) roost and possibly feed in mangroves, reeds and swampy areas2,5. At dusk, birds fly to fresh, brackish, and salt ponds, lagoons, ephemeral wetlands, tidal flats and agricultural fields (rice and corn) to feed (usually in small flocks), returning to roost-sites just before dawn9. Scrub and coppice are important nesting habitats; birds often nest on offshore cays2,9,12. The nest is usually in a cluster of palm fronds, a clump of bromeliads, on a branch, in a tree-cavity, or in a leaf-lined scrape on the ground2,9,11. Breeding has been recorded in virtually all months, but peaks in the summer10,11,12. |
| Systems: | Freshwater |
| Major Threat(s): | It has suffered from excessive and under-regulated hunting for subsistence (including eggs) and sport2,4,10. Wetlands are a very limited habitat in the Caribbean, with continuing conversion primarily for development2,4,12. More than 50% of remaining wetlands are seriously degraded by the cutting of mangroves and swamp-forest, pollution (chemical runoff from nearby agriculture, sewage, garbage), water mismanagement, and natural catastrophes such as droughts and hurricanes4,10. Predation by introduced species is inadequately documented, but mongoose, racoons, rats, and feral cats and dogs are known to kill adults and young and eat eggs4,9. |
| Conservation Actions: |
Conservation actions underway: CITES Appendix II. CMS Appendix II. It is legally protected throughout much of its range, but law enforcement is inadequate4. Since 1997, the West Indian Whistling-duck Working Group of the Society for the Conservation and Study of Caribbean Birds has conducted a region-wide public education and awareness programme that provides local teachers and educators with training and educational materials and works to raise awareness and appreciation for the value of local wetlands and wetland biodiversity5,6,7. The project has also sponsored surveys and worked with decision-makers, community leaders and hunters to reduce poaching and encourage protection of local wetlands, especially via development of "Watchable Wildlife Ponds" - wetlands equipped with interpretive signs and viewing areas where local people, school groups, and tourists can easily observe whistling-ducks and other wildlife5,6,7. There are several protected areas in the region but, in general, suitable habitat, especially wetlands, is under-represented and many degraded wetlands should be restored2. There are plans to establish a re-introduced population on the Virgin Islands (to UK)2. Conservation actions proposed: Conduct extensive surveys to assess numbers and distribution in each country5. Assist local authorities in establishing a long-term monitoring programme5. Conserve and restore key sites5. Establish legal protection in countries where it does not exist and enforce protection in others. Continue public education and awareness programmes5. |
| Citation: | BirdLife International 2008. Dendrocygna arborea. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 November 2009. |
| Disclaimer: | To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>. |
| Feedback: | If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided |