







| Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIMALIA | CHORDATA | AVES | CHARADRIIFORMES | SCOLOPACIDAE |
| Scientific Name: | Tryngites subruficollis | |||||||||
| Species Authority: | (Vieillot, 1819) | |||||||||
Common Name/s:
|
||||||||||
| Red List Category & Criteria: | Near Threatened ver 3.1 | ||||||
| Year Published: | 2008 | ||||||
| Assessor/s: | BirdLife International | ||||||
| Reviewer/s: | Bird, J., Butchart, S. | ||||||
| Contributor/s: | Casañas, H., Harrington, B., Lanctot, R., Russell, B. | ||||||
|
Justification: This species underwent rapid historical declines. Its moderately small remaining population continues to decline and as a result it is considered Near-Threatened. |
|||||||
| History: |
|
||||||
| Range Description: | Tryngites subruficollis breeds sporadically along arctic coasts from central Alaska, USA to Devon Island, Canada, with a relict population on Wrangel Island and west Chukotka, Russia. Also reported from St Pierre and Miquelon (to France) as a non-breeder. Birds winter in eastern South America including Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia after passing through the Greater and Lesser Antilles or around the Gulf coast of Central America. Originally numbering in the hundreds of thousands to millions (1890s-1900s), the species was brought to near extinction in the early 1920s by hunting. It has not recovered, with the current population estimated at 16,000-84,000 individuals based on various estimates from birds passing through the Rainwater Basin in Nebraska and the Gulf coastal plain in Louisiana and Texas5. It is difficult to monitor, as it is not faithful to breeding sites (and possibly not to wintering sites), but data from North American migration sites suggests that declines are continuing. |
| Countries: |
Native:
Antigua and Barbuda; Argentina; Barbados; Belize; Bermuda; Bolivia; Brazil; Canada; Colombia; Costa Rica; Ecuador; El Salvador; Grenada; Guadeloupe; Guatemala; Guyana; Haiti; Honduras; Martinique; Mexico; Netherlands Antilles; Nicaragua; Panama; Paraguay; Peru; Puerto Rico; Russian Federation; Saint Lucia; Saint Pierre and Miquelon; Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; Suriname; Trinidad and Tobago; United States; Uruguay; Venezuela
Vagrant:
Australia; Austria; Bahamas; Belgium; Bulgaria; Cuba; Denmark; Egypt; Faroe Islands; Finland; France; French Polynesia; Gabon; Gambia; Germany; Ghana; Hungary; Iceland; India; Ireland; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Kenya; Korea, Republic of; Malta; Marshall Islands; Morocco; Namibia; Netherlands; Norway; Oman; Papua New Guinea; Poland; Portugal; Saudi Arabia; Seychelles; Sierra Leone; South Africa; Spain; Sri Lanka; Svalbard and Jan Mayen; Sweden; Switzerland; Taiwan, Province of China; Tunisia; Ukraine; United Kingdom; United States Minor Outlying Islands; Virgin Islands, U.S.
|
| Range Map: | Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. |
| Population: | Morrison et al. (in press). |
| Population Trend: |
Decreasing
|
| Habitat and Ecology: | It breeds in the high Arctic on well drained tundra with tussocks and scant vegetation. It is generally not near the sea and avoids marshes. It appears to depend heavily upon intensive grazing by livestock in its wintering grounds to creat short grassland4, but also uses flooded Pampas grasslands. During migration it is found on many short grass habitats. It is a lekking species. |
| Systems: | Terrestrial |
| Major Threat(s): | It was severely overhunted in the early part of the 1900s reportedly declining to near extinction from a population which may have number in the millions. Immediate threats are the matter of some conjecture. The breeding grounds may be affected by habitat loss and degradation and environmental contaminants3. Previously, ongoing declines were attributed to widespread and continuing destruction of grasslands in the wintering range1,2, but there seems little evidence to support this, although environmental contaminants may be playing a part there3. Exposure on migration ot toxic chemicals and pollutants may pose a threat and is being investigated further6. |
| Conservation Actions: |
Conservation Actions Underway CMS Appendix I and II. A symposium was held in 2005-2006 to identify priority actions for the conservation of the species. Conservation Actions Proposed Implement priority actions identified at the Buff-breasted Sandpiper symposium. Ascertain the population size and trend for the species. Complete a species action plan. Conserve key staging and wintering grasslands. |
|
Lanctot, R. 2006. Buff-breasted Sandpiper symposium. Wader Study Group Bulletin: 20-22. Lanctot, R. B. 1995. A closer look: Buff-breasted Sandpiper. Birding 27: 384-390. Lanctot, R. B.; Blanco, D. E.; Dias, R. A.; Isacch, J. P.; Gill, V. A.; Almeida, J. B.; Delhey, K.; Petracci, P. F.; Bencke, G. A.; Balbueno, R. A. 2002. Conservation status of the Buff-breasted Sandpiper: historic and contemporary distribution and abundance in South America. Wilson Bulletin 114: 44-72. Lanctot, R. B.; Laredo, C. D. 1994. Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis). In: Poole, A.; Gill, F. (ed.), The birds of North America, No. 91, pp. 1-20. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia and The American Ornithologists' Union, Philadelphia and Washington, DC. Morrison, R. I. G.; McCaffery, B.J.; Skagen, S.; Andres, B.; Page, G.; Jones, S.; Gill, R.E. in prep. Population estimates of North American shorebirds. |
| Citation: | BirdLife International 2008. Tryngites subruficollis. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 May 2012. |
| Disclaimer: | To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>. |
| Feedback: | If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided |