







| Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIMALIA | CHORDATA | AVES | ANSERIFORMES | ANATIDAE |
| Scientific Name: | Aythya nyroca | |||||||||
| Species Authority: | (Güldenstädt, 1770) | |||||||||
Common Name/s:
|
||||||||||
| Red List Category & Criteria: | Near Threatened ver 3.1 | ||||||||||||
| Year Published: | 2008 | ||||||||||||
| Assessor/s: | BirdLife International | ||||||||||||
| Reviewer/s: | Butchart, S., Crosby, M., Pople, R., Burfield, I., Gilroy, J. | ||||||||||||
| Contributor/s: | Jayadevan, P., Heinicke, T., Hughes, B., Petkov, N., Khan, A., Braunlich, A., Parveen, A., Mischenko, A., Subramanya, S., Hatzofe, O., Isfendiyaroglu, S., Inskipp, C., Halder, R., Xing Lianlian, .., Yasmeen, R., Tordoff, A., Liu Dongping, .., Baral, H., Katzner, T. | ||||||||||||
|
Justification: Given that this species's range may fluctuate considerably from year to year - particularly in Asia - owing to changing water levels, it is very hard to estimate the global population or trends. There have been rapid declines in Europe, but evidence of declines in the larger Asian populations is sparse, and sometimes contradictory, so it is currently listed as Near Threatened. Evidence of rapid declines in Asia would qualify the species for uplisting to Vulnerable. |
|||||||||||||
| History: |
|
||||||||||||
| Range Description: | Aythya nyroca breeds principally in south-western Asia (east to China and south to Pakistan and India), central and eastern Europe, and north Africa9. The wintering range overlaps with the breeding range and extends to the Middle East, north-east and West Africa (mainly Mali and Nigeria9) and South-East Asia. Four main populations are recognised and migration occurs from early September to mid-October, whilst breeding grounds are re-occupied from mid-March to early May9. The main part of the population occurs in Asia, where there is much suitable habitat and it remains common, although quantitative data are lacking. Given that this species's range may fluctuate considerably from year to year, owing to changing water levels, it is unclear how much one-off high counts from Asian countries represent just one mobile population22. The current global population is estimated at c.163,000-257,000 individuals. An estimate for North Africa and Asia of 10,000 individuals in 19914 appears too low. About 600 pairs breed in the El Kala National Park, Algeria9. In Europe the breeding population is estimated at 12,000-18,000 pairs with the largest population in Romania (5,500-6,500 breeding pairs, concentrated in the Danube Delta)14, 15. Significant populations (between 1,000 and 5,000 pairs) are also found in Croatia, Azerbaijan, and possibly Turkey, whilst smaller populations (c.500-1,000 pairs) are found in Russia, Hungary, and possibly Serbia and Ukraine14,15. Populations in most European countries are showing signs of continuing large-scale declines. Sporadic breeding and/or wintering occurs in several western European countries. In Asia recent surveys have found high numbers, perhaps into the tens of thousands, in Inner Mongolia6 (although the accuracy of these counts is unclear, and may refer to non-breeding birds from other areas), 6,000-7,000 breeding pairs in Kazakhstan27 (although others have suggested it is uncommon17,20) and it is apparently common on the Tibetan Plateau, China5, and in winter in India, Bangladesh (70,000 birds counted at one group of four sites)11, Myanmar and Thailand. Other large winter counts have been made in Azerbaijan (9,000 birds), Turkmenistan (21,000 birds)2 and Uzbekistan (7,000 birds3, but recently less27). Small numbers occur on passage in Lebanon and Qatar and also in winter in Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. The species has declined markedly in Europe where there have been declines of more than 20% in eight European countries14, 15. The status of the European population (12,000-18,000 pairs, occupying 25-49% of the global breeding range) was recently reassessed14, 15. Following a large decline in Europe during 1970-199026, the species continued to decline during 1990-2000, when up to 45% of birds appear to have been lost (particularly in south-east Europe). The European population is believed to have declined overall by 14, 15. There is also some evidence for declines in the number of birds in India19,24, Kazakhstan1,23 (although other evidence suggests that this population is actually stable27), Kyrgyzstan17, Pakistan21, Uzbekistan3,23 (but this population may have now stabilised27) and Vietnam25, and to a minor degree in Nepal17 (but possibly stable there13). Winter counts from Israel suggest that population to be generally stable in recent years16. In Ukraine, numbers have fallen from an estimated 65,000 in the late 1960s9 to an estimated 1,500 pairs, whilst declines have also been recorded in Moldova, Albania (from 100-300 pairs to a recent estimate of 0-3 pairs10), Poland, Hungary, and Spain (from c.500 pairs 100 years ago to five pairs in recent years)9. However, populations remain stable in a number of other countries and slight local increases may have occurred in parts of Russia and Ukraine since hunting has diminished due to the species's rarity9. This species's range has fluctuated considerably over the last c.150 years, although the overall trend has been towards a declining population and distribution. Owing to significant local declines it is classified as Vulnerable in Europe. Evidence of declines in the larger Asian populations is sparse, and sometimes contradictory, and so there is insufficient evidence at present to warrant uplisting to Vulnerable globally. |
| Countries: |
Native:
Afghanistan; Albania; Algeria; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Bangladesh; Belarus; Belgium; Bhutan; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Central African Republic; Chad; China; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Egypt; Eritrea; Ethiopia; France; Gambia; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; India; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Iraq; Israel; Italy; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kuwait; Kyrgyzstan; Latvia; Lebanon; Libyan Arab Jamahiriya; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Mali; Malta; Mauritania; Moldova; Mongolia; Montenegro; Morocco; Myanmar; Nepal; Netherlands; Niger; Nigeria; Oman; Pakistan; Palestinian Territory, Occupied; Poland; Portugal; Qatar; Romania; Russian Federation; Russian Federation; Russian Federation; Saudi Arabia; Senegal; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sudan; Switzerland; Syrian Arab Republic; Tajikistan; Thailand; Tunisia; Turkey; Turkmenistan; Ukraine; United Arab Emirates; Uzbekistan; Viet Nam; Western Sahara; Yemen
Vagrant:
Bahrain; Benin; Bermuda; Burkina Faso; Cape Verde; Denmark; Finland; Ghana; Hong Kong; Ireland; Japan; Maldives; Norway; Seychelles; Sierra Leone; Sweden; Uganda; United Kingdom
Present - origin uncertain:
Cameroon; Togo
|
| Range Map: | Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. |
| Population: | 2,400-2,600 in N/NW Africa (Dodman 2005); 36,000-54,000 in E. Europe (12,000-18,000 pairs equating to 36,000-54,000 individuals: BirdLife International 2004 [Birds in Europe]); 25,000-100,000 in SW Asia And NE Africa (based on counts in 1990s of 9,000 in Azerbaijan, 21,000 in Turkmenistan and 7,000 in Uzbekistan [Carboneras 1992a, Kashkarov and Mukhina 1997]: Delaney et al. 1999, Gilissen et al. 2002); 100,000 in S, E, and SE Asia (based on tens of thousands breeding in Inner Mongolia [Xing Lianlian in litt. 1998], common on Tibetan Plateau [Scott 1993]; >90,000 on hoars of NE Bangladesh in Jan 2002 (Ul Haque and Halder 2002), but S, E and SE Asian population may be considerably larger than 100,000. |
| Population Trend: |
Decreasing
|
| Habitat and Ecology: | Behaviour This species is chiefly migratory28,30, although little is known about its migratory routes30 and some individuals in southern populations may remain on the breeding grounds all year29. It breeds from April or May28 until late June31 in single pairs or loose groups28. Adults undertake a wing moulting period on the breeding grounds between July and August38 when large flocks of moulting individuals may gather38 (no moult migration is recorded however)30. Departure from the breeding grounds begins in mid- to late-August40 and peaks in October29, with the species arriving in wintering areas from late October30. The return migration to the breeding grounds begins in early March30. Large gatherings of up to 100 individuals may occur prior to migration at the end of the post-breeding moult31 (July to August)30, and on migration the species often remains in small groups of 20-50 individuals40. Outside of the breeding season the species may be observed solitarily, in pairs or small loose groups31 of 2-5 individuals33, and larger gatherings of 1,000-2,000 individuals are also recorded from wintering grounds in Niger and Chad22. Habitat It shows a strong preference for fresh standing water33,40 and is very rarely found on flowing streams or rivers40. It requires shallow water 30-100 cm deep close to littoral vegetation for feeeding28,29 and generally avoids large open areas29,30. In Bulgaria there is evidence that the species shows a preference for well-vegetated, comparatively shallow wetlands with well-structured mosaic vegetation and a diversity of microhabitats. It is also found on shallow mudflats, possibly as a result of more accessible and abundant invertebrate food sources in this habitat41. Breeding Shallow eutrophic freshwater pools and marshes with dense abundant submergent, floating, emergent and shoreline vegetation (e.g. reedbeds) are the major breeding habitats28,29,40. Shallow banks with flooded vegetation and mudflats are particularly used for foraging during this season. The species shows a particular preference for breeding, moulting and staging on large river deltas29,30,38 and extensively managed fish ponds in Eastern Europe37,38. It is also less-commonly known to utilise brackish waters of estuaries, coastal lagoons, reservoirs, salt-pans, sewage farms, canals and drainage ditches during this season33,38,40. Non-breeding Its habitat requirements outside of the breeding season are similar to those of the breeding season29, although it may also frequent large lakes, open lagoons, coastal marshes with reedbeds28,29,30 and shallow coastal bays, straits and estuaries38. Diet Although the species is omnivorous, plant material such as seeds, roots and vegetative parts of aquatic plants28 (Potamogeton spp., Ceratophyllum spp., Scirpus spp., Carex spp. and macroalgae Chara spp.)29 dominates its diet. Animal matter taken includes worms, molluscs28 (snails)29, crustaceans, adult and larval insects28 (beetles, chironomids29, dragonflies, waterbugs, caddisflies, flies34), amphibians28 (frogs, tadpoles and spawn)29,34 and small fish28 up to 3 cm long34. Breeding site The nest is a low platform33 of reeds and other vegetation28 placed on the ground or on an islet or hummock in thick vegetation close to water29,32. Alternatively nests may be placed over water on floating mats of vegetation32 or in dense reedbeds along the shoreline29,32. |
| Systems: | Terrestrial; Freshwater; Marine |
| Major Threat(s): | The species is threatened by the degradation and destruction of well-vegetated shallow pools and other wetland habitats9,38,28,29 (e.g. changes to the vegetation community, disruption of water regimes, siltation, and increased water turbidity)38 as a result of excessive drainage and water abstraction9,35,38, peat extraction35, eutrophication (from inadequate sewage treatment and nutrient run-off)38, oil pollution35, dam and barrage construction, the building of infrastructure on flood-plains9,38 and river canalisation29. Changing land management practices such as reed cutting and burning during the breeding season37, over-grazing38, decreased grazing and mowing of wet meadows35, and abandonment (causing succession to scrub) or intensification (causing reversion to open water) of extensively managed fishponds9,29,37,38 also threatens the species. The introduction of non-native species has caused further habitat degradation. For example the stocking of lakes with and accidental introduction of Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella has resulted in reductions in macrophyte biomass and corresponding reductions in invertebrate biomass29,38, and in Bulgaria an introduced shrub (Desert False Indigo Amorpha fruticosa) is changing the ecological character of wetlands38. Introduced predators such as the Wels Catfish Silurus glanis (Kazakhstan) that predates ducklings, and the Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus (Aral Sea region) have also caused population declines38. Increased drought due to global climate change may pose a threat to the species in part of its range9,38. Disturbance by fishing boats and anglers alongside fringe vegetation could cause abandonment of the breeding sites or disrupt the timing of breeding40. Hunting is another serious threat to the species9,28,38. Large numbers are shot on passage in the autumn (e.g. through the Volga delta) and on the wintering grounds (e.g. Sudan)29,36. Illegal and accidental hunting also persists in most European countries. Other lower-level threats include lead poisoning (from ingestion of discarded lead shot), and entanglement and drowning in fishing nets38. |
| Conservation Actions: |
Conservation Actions Underway The species is fully protected in Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Netherlands, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Switzerland, and is protected from hunting in Austria, Belgium, Greece, Poland, Turkey and Ukraine. It is listed on Annex I of the European Union Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds, on Appendix III of the Bern Convention and on Appendices I and II of the Bonn Convention. The species has received little international conservation action, although a number of national initiatives have been developed recently, notably habitat management in Bulgaria and re-introduction schemes in Italy1. One of the highest priorities for this species is to establish systematic annual monitoring of Asian populations to more accurately assess trends. Such monitoring, if it provided evidence of continuing and significant declines across major Asian populations, could provide reason to uplist this species. An International Single Species Action Plan has been adopted by the Bern Convention, CMS and AEWA, which lays out out a framework for conservation action throughout the specie's range8. A restoration project for two key breeding sites on the Danube in Bulgaria is underway, funded by the World Bank10. Conservation Actions Proposed Promote the full legal protection of A. nyroca and its habitat through national and international legislation; promote environmentally friendly management of fishponds in Eastern Europe; promote adequate protection and management of key sites; promote conservation in the wider environment for the benefit of A. nyroca and its habitat; prevent mortality and disturbance caused by hunting; monitor the remaining population (particularly in Asia)and develop census techniques; investigate productivity and mortality; investigate ecology and limiting factors; investigate the impact of C. idella on the species and its habitat; develop and implement education programmes for the conservation of A. nyroca and its habitats. |
| Citation: | BirdLife International 2008. Aythya nyroca. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 17 May 2012. |
| Disclaimer: | To make use of this information, please check the <Terms of Use>. |
| Feedback: | If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided |